Evaluation of Dairy Wastewater Treatment Systems Using Carbon Footprint Analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Karolinczak, Beata [1 ]
Dabrowski, Wojciech [2 ]
Zylka, Radoslaw [3 ]
机构
[1] Warsaw Univ Technol, Fac Bldg Serv Hydro & Environm Engn, PL-00653 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Bialystok Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn & Environm Sci, 45E Wiejska St, PL-15351 Bialystok, Poland
[3] Bielmlek Dairy Cooperat, Wojska Polskiego 52, PL-17100 Bielsk Podlaski, Poland
关键词
dairy WWTP; activated sludge; sewage sludge management; anaerobic and aerobic stabilisation; carbon footprint; greenhouse gases emissions; energy; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; SLUDGE TREATMENT; METHANE; BALANCE; PLANTS;
D O I
10.3390/en14175366
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Modernisation of municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) should be carried out, taking into account its impact on global warming, e.g., through carbon footprint (CF) analysis. An important industrial sector in Poland is the dairy industry. In dairy WWTPs, the aerobic sewage sludge stabilisation applied thus far is being replaced by the anaerobic process. This change is positive due to the possibility of energy production, but it is unclear how it affects greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. The aim of the research was to perform CF analysis for two scenarios of dairy WWTP operation. The analysis was based on the real operating data of the current system (current scenario) and project of its modernisation (alternative scenario). The current scenario consists of mechanical and dissolved air flotation (DAF) treatment, biological treatment in sequence batch reactors (SBRs), aerobic sewage sludge stabilisation and its final farmland usage. The alternative scenario assumes replacing aerobic stabilisation with anaerobic stabilisation and a combined heat and power (CHP) system. The CF calculations were based on empirical models, taking into account different emission input parameters, expressed in CO2 equivalents (CO2e). The total CF of the current scenario was 22 kg CO2e PE-1 year(-1), while the alternative was 45 kg CO2e PE-1 year(-1). The largest share in the current scenario belongs to emissions from WWTPs and energy use, while in the alternative, there is the addition of emissions from biogas use.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint of Greek Wastewater Treatment Plants
    Goliopoulos, Nikos
    Mamais, Daniel
    Noutsopoulos, Constantinos
    Dimopoulou, Argyri
    Kounadis, Christos
    WATER, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [22] Energy use and carbon footprint for potable water and wastewater treatment
    Presura, Elena
    Robescu, Lacramioara Diana
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2017, 11 (01): : 191 - 198
  • [23] Wastewater Treatment Plant Assessment by Quantifying the Carbon and Water Footprint
    Gomez-Llanos, Eva
    Matias-Sanchez, Agustin
    Duran-Barroso, Pablo
    WATER, 2020, 12 (11) : 1 - 16
  • [24] Grey water footprint of a dairy industry wastewater treatment plant: a comparative study
    Yapicioglu, Pelin Soyertas
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 14 (01) : 137 - 144
  • [25] Comprehensive carbon footprint analysis of wastewater treatment: A case study of modified cyclic activated sludge technology for low carbon source urban wastewater treatment
    Wang, Yuting
    Gao, Wenfang
    Lv, Longyi
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Ren, Zhijun
    Sun, Li
    Liu, Xiaoyang
    Wang, Pengfei
    Sun, Zhi
    Tian, Yu
    Zhang, Guangming
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 923
  • [26] Milk carbon footprint of silvopastoral dairy systems in the Northern Peruvian Amazon
    Ruiz-Llontop, Deysi
    Velarde-Guillen, Jose
    Fuentes, Eduardo
    Prudencio, Melisa
    Gomez, Carlos
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2022, 54 (04)
  • [27] Milk carbon footprint of silvopastoral dairy systems in the Northern Peruvian Amazon
    Deysi Ruiz-Llontop
    José Velarde-Guillén
    Eduardo Fuentes
    Melisa Prudencio
    Carlos Gómez
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2022, 54
  • [28] Energy and carbon footprint analysis of municipal wastewater treatment process integrated with food waste disposer
    Guan, Jianyu
    Zhuang, Huichuan
    Lau, Chun Yin
    Leng, Ling
    Yeung, Chi Shun
    Vuppaladadiyam, Arun Krishna
    Wang, Huaimin
    Tse, Ho-Yin
    Leu, Shao-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 375
  • [29] Wastewater quality evaluation in terms of wastewater quality index using hybrid constructed wetland for treatment of dairy and municipal wastewater
    Krishna, Singh K.
    Rakesh, Vaishya C.
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2025, 97 (02)
  • [30] A study on the carbon footprint contributions from a large wastewater treatment plant
    Riccardo, Boiocchi
    Paolo, Viotti
    Davide, Lancione
    Nicoletta, Stracqualursi
    Vincenzo, Torretta
    Marco, Ragazzi
    Gabriela, Ionescu
    Cristina, Rada Elena
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 9 : 274 - 286