The political effects of emergency frames in sustainability

被引：49

作者：

Patterson, James ^{[1
]}

Wyborn, Carina ^{[2
]}

Westman, Linda ^{[3
]}

Brisbois, Marie Claire ^{[4
]}

Milkoreit, Manjana ^{[5
]}

Jayaram, Dhanasree ^{[6
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Fac Geosci, Utrecht, Netherlands

[2] Australian Natl Univ, Inst Water Futures, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Coll Sci, Canberra, ACT, Australia

[3] Univ Sheffield, Urban Inst, Sheffield, England

[4] Univ Sussex, Sci Policy Res Unit SPRU, Sussexe, England

[5] Univ Oslo, Dept Sociol & Human Geog, Oslo, Norway

[6] Manipal Acad Higher Educ, Dept Geopolit & Int Relat, Manipal, India

来源：

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY | 2021年 / 4卷 / 10期

基金：

欧洲研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;

关键词：

CLIMATE-CHANGE; KERALA FLOODS; CRISIS; RISK; TIME; FEAR; APOCALYPSE; EXCEPTION; TOMORROW; BUSHFIRE;

D O I：

10.1038/s41893-021-00749-9

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

Emergency frames are mobilized in contemporary sustainability debates, both in response to specific events and strategically. The strategic deployment of emergency frames by proponents of sustainability action aims to stimulate collective action on issues for which it is lacking. But this is contentious due to a range of possible effects. We critically review interdisciplinary social science literature to examine the political effects of emergency frames in sustainability and develop a typology of five key dimensions of variation. This pinpoints practical areas for evaluating the utility of emergency frames and builds a shared vocabulary for analysis and decision-making. Emergency frames in sustainability debates can stimulate collective action on issues for which it is lacking but can have consequences. This Review examines the political effects of emergency frames in sustainability and develops a typology of different effects to build a shared vocabulary for analysis and decision-making.

引用

页码：841 / 850

页数：10

共 50 条

[31] Learning How to Deal with Values, Frames and Governance in Sustainability Appraisal
Bond, Alan J.
Dockerty, Trudie
Lovett, Andrew
Riche, Andrew B.
Haughton, Alison J.
Bohan, David A.
Sage, Rufus B.
Shield, Ian F.
Finch, Jon W.
Turner, Martin M.
Karp, Angela
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2011, 45 (08) : 1157 - 1170
[32] Metaphorical Mapping for Sensemaking and Sensebreaking of Stakeholder Relations in Sustainability Frames
Menon, Kalyani
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 35 (04) : 607 - 626
[33] Functional, symbolic and societal frames for automobility: Implications for sustainability transitions
Sovacool, Benjamin K.
Axsen, Jonn
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 118 : 730 - 746
[34] Unsustainability of Sustainability: Cognitive Frames and Tensions in Bottom of the Pyramid Projects
Garima Sharma
Anand Kumar Jaiswal
Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 148 : 291 - 307
[35] Unsustainability of Sustainability: Cognitive Frames and Tensions in Bottom of the Pyramid Projects
Sharma, Garima
Jaiswal, Anand Kumar
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 148 (02) : 291 - 307
[36] Interactional trouble in emergency service requests: A problem of frames
Tracy, K
RESEARCH ON LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION, 1997, 30 (04) : 315 - 343
[37] The political sustainability of European Monetary Union
McKay, D
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 29 : 463 - 485
[38] Repairing Political Trust for Practical Sustainability
Weymouth, Robert
Hartz-Karp, Janette
Marinova, Dora
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (17)
[39] Political Sustainability and the design of environmental taxes
Cremer, H
De Donder, P
Gahvari, F
INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2004, 11 (06) : 703 - 719
[40] EMERGENCY FRAMES: GENDER VIOLENCE AND IMMIGRATION STATUS IN SPAIN
Perez, Marta
FEMINIST ECONOMICS, 2012, 18 (02) : 265 - 290

← 1 2 3 4 5 →