Learning How to Deal with Values, Frames and Governance in Sustainability Appraisal

被引:39
|
作者
Bond, Alan J. [1 ]
Dockerty, Trudie [1 ]
Lovett, Andrew [1 ]
Riche, Andrew B. [2 ]
Haughton, Alison J. [2 ]
Bohan, David A. [2 ]
Sage, Rufus B. [3 ]
Shield, Ian F. [2 ]
Finch, Jon W. [4 ]
Turner, Martin M. [5 ]
Karp, Angela [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Rothamsted Res, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England
[3] Game & Wildlife Conservat Trust, Fordingbridge SP6 1EF, England
[4] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford OX10 8BB, Oxon, England
[5] Univ Exeter, Dept Geog, Exeter EX4 4RJ, Devon, England
关键词
Sustainability Appraisal; Biomass crops; Constraints mapping; Learning; Analytic-deliberative; Pluralism; STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; UK; REFLECTIONS; METHODOLOGY; SCENARIOS; SCIENCE; SEA;
D O I
10.1080/00343404.2010.485181
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
BOND A. J., DOCKERTY T., LOVETT A., RICHE A. B., HAUGHTON A. J., BOHAN D. A., SAGE R. B., SHIELD I. F., FINCH J. W., TURNER M. M. and KARP A. Learning how to deal with values, frames and governance in Sustainability Appraisal, Regional Studies. The effectiveness of Sustainability Appraisal is highly contested because of the value-based nature of the assumed goal ( sustainable development), because effectiveness itself can be determined through different theoretical framings, and because good governance does not guarantee sustainable outcomes. Drawing on learning derived from the literature and a case study examining biomass crop planting on a regional scale in England, an approach for managing the Sustainability Appraisal development and application process is proposed. This incorporates analytic-deliberative techniques as the basis for more pluralism, combined with constraints mapping. Such an approach, it is suggested, can better accommodate multiple framings.
引用
收藏
页码:1157 / 1170
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] HOW TO DEAL WITH SMALL OPEN READING FRAMES?
    Wanczyk, Malgorzata
    Blazej, Pawel
    Mackiewicz, Pawel
    Cebrat, Stanislaw
    BIOINFORMATICS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS MODELS, METHODS AND ALGORITHMS, 2012, : 246 - 250
  • [3] A comprehensive sustainability appraisal of water governance in Phoenix, AZ
    Larson, Kelli L.
    Wiek, Arnim
    Keeler, Lauren Withycombe
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 116 : 58 - 71
  • [4] Dilemma of Government Governance: What It is and How to Deal With It
    Xiong Feng
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (10TH), VOL I, 2014, : 367 - 372
  • [5] How do students deal with the uncertainty of sustainability challenges? Metacognitive learning in a transdisciplinary course
    Bohm, Nina L.
    Klaassen, Renate G.
    van Bueren, Ellen
    den Brok, Perry
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2024, 9
  • [6] LEARNING HOW TO DEAL WITH CHIPS
    不详
    NEW SCIENTIST, 1979, 84 (1179) : 338 - 338
  • [7] Governance for sustainability—How Are We Doing?
    Pierre Horwitz
    EcoHealth, 2015, 12 (2) : 387 - 388
  • [8] Governance: How to Deal with ICT Security in the Power Infrastructure?
    Masera, Marcelo
    SECURING ELECTRICITY SUPPLY IN THE CYBER AGE: EXPLORING THE RISKS OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY IN TOMORROW'S ELECTRICITY INFRASTRUCTURE, 2010, 15 : 111 - 127
  • [9] A relational approach to deal with ambiguity in multi-actor governance for sustainability
    Craps, M.
    Brugnach, M. F.
    MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ECOLOGICAL HAZARDS IV, 2015, 199 : 233 - 243
  • [10] Sustainability Appraisal of Water Governance Regimes: The Case of Guanacaste, Costa Rica
    Kuzdas, Christopher
    Wiek, Arnim
    Warner, Benjamin
    Vignola, Raffaele
    Morataya, Ricardo
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 54 (02) : 205 - 222