Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

被引:48
|
作者
Sattler, Matteo C. [1 ]
Jaunig, Johannes [1 ]
Watson, Estelle D. [2 ,3 ]
van Poppel, Mireille N. M. [1 ,4 ]
Mokkink, Lidwine B. [5 ]
Terwee, Caroline B. [5 ]
Dietz, Pavel [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Sport Sci, Graz, Austria
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Ctr Exercise Sci & Sports Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Therapeut Sci, Private Bag 3, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, MRC Wits Dev Pathways Hlth Res Unit, Dept Paediat, Fac Hlth Sci,Sch Clin Med, Private Bag 3, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Occupat Social & Environm Med, Univ Med Ctr, Mainz, Germany
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ENERGY-EXPENDITURE; WEIGHT-GAIN; CUT-POINTS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; ACCELEROMETER; HEALTH; VALIDATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn order toassess physical activity (PA) during pregnancy, it is important to choose the instrument with the best measurement properties.ObjectivesTo systematically summarize, appraise, and compare the measurement properties of all self-administered questionnaires assessing PA in pregnancy.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and SPORTDiscus with the following inclusion criteria: (i) the study reported at least one measurement property (reliability, criterion validity,construct validity, responsiveness) of a self-administered questionnaire; (ii) the questionnaire intended to measure PA; (iii) the questionnaire was evaluated in healthy pregnant women; and (iv) the study was published in English. We evaluated results, quality of individual studies, and quality of evidence using a standardized checklist (Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires [QAPAQ]) and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.ResultsSeventeen articles, reporting 18 studies of 11 different PA questionnaires (17 versions), were included. Most questionnaire versions showed insufficient measurement properties. Only the French and Turkish versions of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) showed both sufficient reliability and construct validity. However, all versions of the PPAQ pooled together showed insufficient construct validity. The quality of individual studies was usually high for reliability but varied considerably for construct validity. Overall, the quality of evidence was very low to moderate.ConclusionsWe recommend the PPAQ to assess PA in pregnancy, although the pooled results revealed insufficient construct validity. The lack of appropriate standards in data collection and processing criteria for objective devices in measuring PA during pregnancy attenuates the quality of evidence. Therefore, research on the validity of comparison instruments in pregnancy followed by consensus on validation reference criteria and standards of PA measurement is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:2317 / 2346
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measurement properties of questionnaires assessing participation in children and adolescents with a disability: a systematic review
    Linda Rainey
    Ruth van Nispen
    Carlijn van der Zee
    Ger van Rens
    Quality of Life Research, 2014, 23 : 2793 - 2808
  • [42] Measurement properties of translated versions of neck-specific questionnaires: a systematic review
    Schellingerhout, Jasper M.
    Heymans, Martijn W.
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    de Vet, Henrica C.
    Koes, Bart W.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11
  • [43] Measurement properties of questionnaires assessing participation in children and adolescents with a disability: a systematic review
    Rainey, Linda
    van Nispen, Ruth
    van der Zee, Carlijn
    van Rens, Ger
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (10) : 2793 - 2808
  • [44] How to promote physical activity during pregnancy : A systematic review
    James, P.
    Morgant, R.
    Merviel, P.
    Saraux, A.
    Giroux-Metges, M. A.
    Guillodo, Y.
    Dupre, P. F.
    Muller, M.
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 49 (09)
  • [45] Physical activity during pregnancy and offspring neurodevelopment: A systematic review
    Nino Cruz, Gloria Isabel
    Varela, Andrea Ramirez
    da Silva, Inacio Crochemore M.
    Hallal, Pedro Curi
    Santos, Ina S.
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (04) : 369 - 379
  • [46] A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
    Hendrik Hendrik JF Helmerhorst
    Søren Brage
    Janet Warren
    Herve Besson
    Ulf Ekelund
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9
  • [47] A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
    Helmerhorst, Hendrik J. F.
    Brage, Soren
    Warren, Janet
    Besson, Herve
    Ekelund, Ulf
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2012, 9
  • [48] How reliable, valid and readable are brief physical activity questionnaires? Results of a systematic review
    Tcymbal, Antonina
    Abu-Omar, Karim
    Messing, Sven
    Gelius, Peter
    Rakovac, Ivo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33 : I42 - I42
  • [49] How reliable, valid and readable are brief physical activity questionnaires? Results of a systematic review
    Lacza, Gyongyver
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33 : I42 - I42
  • [50] Suitability of physical activity questionnaires for older adults in fall prevention trials: A systematic review
    Jorstad-Stein, EC
    Hauer, K
    Becker, C
    Bonnefoy, M
    Nakash, RA
    Skelton, DA
    Lamb, SE
    JOURNAL OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2005, 13 (04) : 461 - 481