Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

被引:48
|
作者
Sattler, Matteo C. [1 ]
Jaunig, Johannes [1 ]
Watson, Estelle D. [2 ,3 ]
van Poppel, Mireille N. M. [1 ,4 ]
Mokkink, Lidwine B. [5 ]
Terwee, Caroline B. [5 ]
Dietz, Pavel [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Sport Sci, Graz, Austria
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Ctr Exercise Sci & Sports Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Therapeut Sci, Private Bag 3, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, MRC Wits Dev Pathways Hlth Res Unit, Dept Paediat, Fac Hlth Sci,Sch Clin Med, Private Bag 3, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Occupat Social & Environm Med, Univ Med Ctr, Mainz, Germany
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ENERGY-EXPENDITURE; WEIGHT-GAIN; CUT-POINTS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; ACCELEROMETER; HEALTH; VALIDATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn order toassess physical activity (PA) during pregnancy, it is important to choose the instrument with the best measurement properties.ObjectivesTo systematically summarize, appraise, and compare the measurement properties of all self-administered questionnaires assessing PA in pregnancy.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and SPORTDiscus with the following inclusion criteria: (i) the study reported at least one measurement property (reliability, criterion validity,construct validity, responsiveness) of a self-administered questionnaire; (ii) the questionnaire intended to measure PA; (iii) the questionnaire was evaluated in healthy pregnant women; and (iv) the study was published in English. We evaluated results, quality of individual studies, and quality of evidence using a standardized checklist (Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires [QAPAQ]) and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.ResultsSeventeen articles, reporting 18 studies of 11 different PA questionnaires (17 versions), were included. Most questionnaire versions showed insufficient measurement properties. Only the French and Turkish versions of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) showed both sufficient reliability and construct validity. However, all versions of the PPAQ pooled together showed insufficient construct validity. The quality of individual studies was usually high for reliability but varied considerably for construct validity. Overall, the quality of evidence was very low to moderate.ConclusionsWe recommend the PPAQ to assess PA in pregnancy, although the pooled results revealed insufficient construct validity. The lack of appropriate standards in data collection and processing criteria for objective devices in measuring PA during pregnancy attenuates the quality of evidence. Therefore, research on the validity of comparison instruments in pregnancy followed by consensus on validation reference criteria and standards of PA measurement is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:2317 / 2346
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Qualitative Attributes and Measurement Properties of Physical Activity Questionnaires A Checklist
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    van Poppel, Mireille N. M.
    Chinapaw, Mai J. M.
    van Mechelen, Willem
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 40 (07) : 525 - 537
  • [22] Measurement properties of family resilience assessment questionnaires: a systematic review
    Zhou, Jia
    He, Bin
    He, Yaoyu
    Huang, Wei
    Zhu, Hongxu
    Zhang, Mengmeng
    Wang, Yuhuan
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2020, 37 (05) : 581 - 591
  • [23] Measurement properties of depression questionnaires in patients with diabetes: a systematic review
    Susan E. M. van Dijk
    Marcel C. Adriaanse
    Lennart van der Zwaan
    Judith E. Bosmans
    Harm W. J. van Marwijk
    Maurits W. van Tulder
    Caroline B. Terwee
    Quality of Life Research, 2018, 27 : 1415 - 1430
  • [24] Measurement Properties of Questionnaires Measuring Continuity of Care: A Systematic Review
    Uijen, Annemarie A.
    Heinst, Claire W.
    Schellevis, Francois G.
    van den Bosch, Wil J. H. M.
    van de Laar, Floris A.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Schers, Henk J.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (07):
  • [25] Measurement properties of depression questionnaires in patients with diabetes: a systematic review
    van Dijk, Susan E. M.
    Adriaanse, Marcel C.
    van der Zwaan, Lennart
    Bosmans, Judith E.
    van Marwijk, Harm W. J.
    van Tulder, Maurits W.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (06) : 1415 - 1430
  • [26] Physical activity parenting: a systematic review of questionnaires and their associations with child activity levels
    Sleddens, E. F. C.
    Kremers, S. P. J.
    Hughes, S. O.
    Cross, M. B.
    Thijs, C.
    De Vries, N. K.
    O'Connor, T. M.
    OBESITY REVIEWS, 2012, 13 (11) : 1015 - 1033
  • [27] Questionnaires Measuring Physical Activity in Clinical Pediatric Populations: A Systematic Review
    Lew, Si Min
    Hewlett, Christal K. L.
    Anderson, Daniel
    Finberg, Matthew
    Ng, Leo
    Spence, Angela L.
    Maiorana, Andrew
    Shetty, Vinutha B.
    Davey, Raymond J.
    PEDIATRIC EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2023, 35 (01) : 48 - 60
  • [28] The repeatability and validity of questionnaires assessing occupational physical activity - a systematic review
    Kwak, Lydia
    Proper, Karin I.
    Hagstromer, Maria
    Sjostrom, Michael
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2011, 37 (01) : 6 - 29
  • [29] Levels of physical activity during pregnancy: a systematic review
    Bawa, Jasmine
    Hesketh, Kathryn
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 : 139 - 139
  • [30] Factors Influencing Physical Activity in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review
    Badilla, Idayu I.
    Fazlinda, Sharifah S. N.
    Norain, A.
    Atika, Noor A.
    Azmawati, M. N.
    MEDICINE AND HEALTH, 2022, 17 (01): : 62 - 74