Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

被引:48
|
作者
Sattler, Matteo C. [1 ]
Jaunig, Johannes [1 ]
Watson, Estelle D. [2 ,3 ]
van Poppel, Mireille N. M. [1 ,4 ]
Mokkink, Lidwine B. [5 ]
Terwee, Caroline B. [5 ]
Dietz, Pavel [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Sport Sci, Graz, Austria
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Ctr Exercise Sci & Sports Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Therapeut Sci, Private Bag 3, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, MRC Wits Dev Pathways Hlth Res Unit, Dept Paediat, Fac Hlth Sci,Sch Clin Med, Private Bag 3, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Occupat Social & Environm Med, Univ Med Ctr, Mainz, Germany
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ENERGY-EXPENDITURE; WEIGHT-GAIN; CUT-POINTS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; ACCELEROMETER; HEALTH; VALIDATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn order toassess physical activity (PA) during pregnancy, it is important to choose the instrument with the best measurement properties.ObjectivesTo systematically summarize, appraise, and compare the measurement properties of all self-administered questionnaires assessing PA in pregnancy.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and SPORTDiscus with the following inclusion criteria: (i) the study reported at least one measurement property (reliability, criterion validity,construct validity, responsiveness) of a self-administered questionnaire; (ii) the questionnaire intended to measure PA; (iii) the questionnaire was evaluated in healthy pregnant women; and (iv) the study was published in English. We evaluated results, quality of individual studies, and quality of evidence using a standardized checklist (Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires [QAPAQ]) and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.ResultsSeventeen articles, reporting 18 studies of 11 different PA questionnaires (17 versions), were included. Most questionnaire versions showed insufficient measurement properties. Only the French and Turkish versions of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) showed both sufficient reliability and construct validity. However, all versions of the PPAQ pooled together showed insufficient construct validity. The quality of individual studies was usually high for reliability but varied considerably for construct validity. Overall, the quality of evidence was very low to moderate.ConclusionsWe recommend the PPAQ to assess PA in pregnancy, although the pooled results revealed insufficient construct validity. The lack of appropriate standards in data collection and processing criteria for objective devices in measuring PA during pregnancy attenuates the quality of evidence. Therefore, research on the validity of comparison instruments in pregnancy followed by consensus on validation reference criteria and standards of PA measurement is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:2317 / 2346
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Matteo C. Sattler
    Johannes Jaunig
    Estelle D. Watson
    Mireille N. M. van Poppel
    Lidwine B. Mokkink
    Caroline B. Terwee
    Pavel Dietz
    Sports Medicine, 2018, 48 : 2317 - 2346
  • [2] Physical activity questionnaires for pregnancy: A systematic review of measurement properties
    Dietz, Pavel
    Sattler, Matteo
    Jaunig, Johannes
    Watson, Estelle
    Mokkink, Lidwine
    Terwee, Caroline
    van Poppel, Mireille
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2018, 15 (10): : S136 - S136
  • [3] Physical activity questionnaires in youth: A systematic review of measurement properties
    Paw, Chin A. M.
    Mokkink, W.
    van Poppel, M.
    van Mechelen, W.
    Terwee, C.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2009, 24 : 128 - 129
  • [4] Physical Activity Questionnaires for Adults A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    van Poppel, Mireille N. M.
    Chinapaw, Mai J. M.
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    van Mechelen, Willem
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 40 (07) : 565 - 600
  • [5] Physical Activity Questionnaires for Youth A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Chinapaw, Mai J. M.
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    van Poppel, Mireille N. M.
    van Mechelen, Willem
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 40 (07) : 539 - 563
  • [6] Physical Activity Questionnaires for YouthA Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Mai J. M. Chinapaw
    Lidwine B. Mokkink
    Mireille N. M. van Poppel
    Willem van Mechelen
    Caroline B. Terwee
    Sports Medicine, 2010, 40 : 539 - 563
  • [7] Physical Activity Questionnaires for AdultsA Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Mireille N. M. van Poppel
    Mai J. M. Chinapaw
    Lidwine B. Mokkink
    Willem van Mechelen
    Caroline B. Terwee
    Sports Medicine, 2010, 40 : 565 - 600
  • [8] Self-Administered Physical Activity Questionnaires for the ElderlyA Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Lisa Forsén
    Nina Waaler Loland
    Anne Vuillemin
    Mai J. M. Chinapaw
    Mireille N. M. van Poppel
    Lidwine B. Mokkink
    Willem van Mechelen
    Caroline B. Terwee
    Sports Medicine, 2010, 40 : 601 - 623
  • [9] Self-Administered Physical Activity Questionnaires for the Elderly A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Forsen, Lisa
    Loland, Nina Waaler
    Vuillemin, Anne
    Chinapaw, Mai J. M.
    van Poppel, Mireille N. M.
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    van Mechelen, Willem
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 40 (07) : 601 - 623
  • [10] Current Evidence of Measurement Properties of Physical Activity Questionnaires for Older Adults: An Updated Systematic Review
    Matteo C. Sattler
    Johannes Jaunig
    Christoph Tösch
    Estelle D. Watson
    Lidwine B. Mokkink
    Pavel Dietz
    Mireille N. M. van Poppel
    Sports Medicine, 2020, 50 : 1271 - 1315