Comparison study of lifetime measurement techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Quinones, G [1 ]
Allen, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Appl Mat Inc, Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
关键词
lifetime; diffusion length; surface photovoltage (SPV); electrolytic metal tracer (ELYMAT); microwave photoconductivity decay (mu-PCD); RTO;
D O I
10.1117/12.324401
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A comparison study was conducted between three different techniques used to resolve iron contamination in silicon. Fourteen 8 " p-type Si wafers were implanted with iron at seven doses ranging from 1x10(8) to 1x10(12) cm(-2). Ail 14 wafers including monitors were processed through an RTP chamber at 1100 degrees C for 6 min. Oxide thickness was measured on an ellipsometer. The wafers were measured by optical and thermal activation SPV, then the wafers were split in two sets. One set of seven wafers was measured by ELYMAT and the other set was measured by mu-PCD. Two different passivation techniques were used for mu-PCD, oxide and ethanol-iodine passivation. At low implant dose all three techniques have limitations. However mu-PCD shows the highest lifetime. At high Fe concentrations all three techniques tend to agree.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 146
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Customer Lifetime Value Incorporating Negative Behavior: Measurement and Comparison
    Wang, Jiana-Fu
    LISS 2014, 2015, : 897 - 901
  • [42] Comparison of time and frequency domain methods for luminescence lifetime measurement
    McGraw, Christina M.
    Khalil, Gamal
    Callis, James B.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C, 2008, 112 (21): : 8079 - 8084
  • [43] Measurement of the (Σ)over-bar- lifetime and direct comparison with the Σ+ lifetime -: art. no. 031101
    Barbosa, RF
    Albuquerque, IF
    Bondar, NF
    Carrigan, R
    Chen, D
    Cooper, PS
    Dai, LS
    Denisov, AS
    Dobrovolsky, AC
    Dubbs, T
    Endler, AMF
    Escobar, CO
    Foucher, M
    Golovtsov, VL
    Gottschalk, H
    Gouffon, P
    Grachev, VT
    Khanzadeev, AV
    Kubantsev, MA
    Kuropatkin, NP
    Lach, J
    Langland, J
    Lang, PF
    Li, CZ
    Li, YS
    Luksys, M
    Mahon, JRP
    McCliment, E
    Morelos, A
    Newsom, C
    Maia, MCP
    Samsonov, VM
    Schegelsky, VA
    Shi, HZ
    Smith, VJ
    Tang, FU
    Terentyev, NK
    Timm, S
    Tkatch, II
    Uvarov, LN
    Vorobyov, AA
    Jie, Y
    Zhao, WH
    Zheng, SC
    Zhong, YY
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2000, 61 (03):
  • [44] Comparison of stress measurement techniques in surface micromachining
    Elbrecht, L
    Storm, U
    Catanescu, R
    Binder, J
    JOURNAL OF MICROMECHANICS AND MICROENGINEERING, 1997, 7 (03) : 151 - 154
  • [45] A COMPARISON OF TLD-200 MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
    KING, CW
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 1984, 47 (01): : 176 - 176
  • [46] A COMPARISON OF POROSITY USING DIFFERENT MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
    Strait, M. M.
    METEORITICS & PLANETARY SCIENCE, 2011, 46 : A225 - A225
  • [47] COMPARISON OF TRACTOR GROUND SPEED MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
    TOMPKINS, FD
    HART, WE
    FREELAND, RS
    WILKERSON, JB
    WILHELM, LR
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1988, 31 (02): : 369 - 374
  • [48] MEASUREMENT OF REAERATION IN STREAMS - COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES - DISCUSSION
    GULLIVER, JS
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1991, 117 (05): : 698 - 700
  • [49] A COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF GROWTH IN ADULT LOBSTERS
    GALLAGHER, ML
    LEAVITT, DF
    BAYER, RC
    RITTENBURG, JH
    AQUACULTURE, 1984, 38 (03) : 195 - 199
  • [50] COMPARISON OF SCATTER MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES IN DIGITAL FLUOROSCOPY
    MAHER, KP
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1993, 38 (12): : 1977 - 1983