Trade liberalization with granular firms

被引:4
|
作者
Alfaro, Martin [1 ]
Warzynski, Frederic [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Econ, 9-08 HM Tory Bldg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H4, Canada
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Econ & Business Econ, Fuglesangs Alle 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, Denmark
关键词
Granularity; Leaders; Oligopolistic firms; Firm heterogeneity; Gains of trade; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; MARKET; GAINS; WELFARE; PERSISTENCE; COMPETITION; ORIGINS; MODELS; EXPORT; ENTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105650
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Relying on rich firm-product Danish data, we document that the bulk of manufacturing revenue comes from industries where large firms and numerous insignificant firms coexist. Given the importance of this market structure in the aggregate, we study its implications for gains of trade by embedding a set of oligopolistic firms into a monopolistic-competition model. In this setting, the idiosyncratic features of large firms become crucial for gains of trade, given the granular importance of their profits for aggregate income. In particular, gains of trade are negatively affected when a large firm has a pronounced home bias, since trade liberalization reduces its profit by increasing domestic competition. A calibration for Denmark reflects this feature: trade liberalization raises the profits of almost all large firms, but the fall in profit of one large firm almost completely offsets the gains in income from the profit channel.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A new dawn for MENA firms: service trade liberalization for more competitive exports
    Karam, Fida
    Zaki, Chahir
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 52 (01) : 19 - 35
  • [32] Growth and welfare effects of unilateral trade liberalization with heterogeneous firms and asymmetric countries
    Naito, Takumi
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 109 : 167 - 173
  • [33] The environmental effect of trade liberalization: Evidence from China's manufacturing firms
    Cui, Jingbo
    Tam, On Kit
    Wang, Bei
    Zhang, Yan
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2020, 43 (12): : 3357 - 3383
  • [34] Does Input-Trade Liberalization Affect Firms' Foreign Technology Choice?
    Bas, Maria
    Berthou, Antoine
    WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 31 (02): : 351 - 384
  • [35] WORKER TRAINING, FIRM PRODUCTIVITY, AND TRADE LIBERALIZATION: EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE FIRMS
    Liu, Qing
    Qiu, Larry
    Yu, Miaojie
    DEVELOPING ECONOMIES, 2017, 55 (03): : 189 - 209
  • [36] Trade liberalization, technology transfer, and firms' productive performance: The case of Indian manufacturing
    Mitra, Arup
    Sharma, Chandan
    Veganzones-Varoudakis, Marie-Ange
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2014, 33 : 1 - 15
  • [37] Trade Liberalization and Pollutant Emissions: Micro Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms
    Zhang, Yiming
    Ye, Zuoliang
    Gan, Kaijun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (16)
  • [38] Trade liberalization and labor's slice of the pie: Evidence from Indian firms
    Ahsan, Reshad N.
    Mitra, Devashish
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2014, 108 : 1 - 16
  • [39] Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading: Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firms
    Bustos, Paula
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (01): : 304 - 340
  • [40] Trade liberalization
    Mussa, M
    TRADE REFORM AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION IN AFRICA, 1998, : 19 - 31