Trade Liberalization and Pollutant Emissions: Micro Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Yiming [1 ]
Ye, Zuoliang [1 ]
Gan, Kaijun [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Int Business Sch, Liutai Ave, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
关键词
trade liberalization; pollutant emissions; intermediate goods; ownership; export enterprises; HAVEN HYPOTHESIS; WTO ACCESSION; PRODUCTIVITY; POLICIES; GROWTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/su16166772
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Trade liberalization has enabled China to become a global manufacturing hub. However, an increasing focus on pollutant emissions has accompanied China's rapid economic growth. This paper uses the Annual Survey of Industrial Firms and the Annual Energy Survey of Industrial Firms from 1998 to 2007 to identify the effects of trade liberalization in final goods and intermediate goods on pollutant emissions of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. The difference-in-difference method is used to analyze the data, with China's accession to the World Trade Organization serving as an exogenous policy shock that brought trade liberalization. The paper's findings indicate the following: (1) Trade liberalization has reduced the tariffs on final goods, which has led to a notable reduction in the intensity of pollutant emissions from Chinese manufacturing firms. (2) Trade liberalization in intermediate goods, meanwhile, has led to a significant increase in the pollutant emission intensity of manufacturing firms. However, the emission reduction effect observed in final goods is more pronounced. (3) The difference-in-difference-in-difference method was used to examine the heterogeneity of the pollutant emission effect of trade liberalization across manufacturing firms. Our analysis revealed that trade liberalization has significantly enhanced the pollutant emission intensity of state-owned enterprises while exhibiting no significant effect on foreign invested enterprises. Furthermore, trade liberalization has intensified pollutant emissions among exporting firms.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trade liberalization and labor monopsony: Evidence from Chinese firms
    Kondo, Illenin O.
    Li, Yao Amber
    Qian, Wei
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 152
  • [2] Input trade liberalization and import switching: Evidence from Chinese firms
    Tian, Wei
    Yu, Miaojie
    REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 27 (04) : 1002 - 1020
  • [3] Processing trade, export intensity, and input trade liberalization: evidence from Chinese firms
    Tian, Wei
    Yu, Miaojie
    JOURNAL OF THE ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMY, 2015, 20 (03) : 444 - 464
  • [4] Services Liberalization and Manufacturing Employment Polarization: Evidence from Chinese Listed Manufacturing Firms
    Li, Biao
    Zhou, Yilin
    Li, Zhenshan
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2024, 60 (10) : 2261 - 2275
  • [5] The environmental effect of trade liberalization: Evidence from China's manufacturing firms
    Cui, Jingbo
    Tam, On Kit
    Wang, Bei
    Zhang, Yan
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2020, 43 (12): : 3357 - 3383
  • [6] Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Industries
    Hu, Albert Guangzhou
    Liu, Zhengning
    REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 22 (03) : 488 - 512
  • [7] Export scope, managerial efficiency, and trade liberalization: Evidence from Chinese firms
    Qiu, Larry D.
    Yu, Miaojie
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2020, 177 : 71 - 90
  • [8] Measured skill premia and input trade liberalization: Evidence from Chinese firms
    Chen, Bo
    Yu, Miaojie
    Yu, Zhihao
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 109 : 31 - 42
  • [9] WORKER TRAINING, FIRM PRODUCTIVITY, AND TRADE LIBERALIZATION: EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE FIRMS
    Liu, Qing
    Qiu, Larry
    Yu, Miaojie
    DEVELOPING ECONOMIES, 2017, 55 (03): : 189 - 209
  • [10] Will the liberalization of intermediate trade restrain corporate pollution emissions?-Empirical evidence from Chinese micro-enterprises
    Yi, Yingying
    Yu, Xiaoxiao
    Sun, Xiaotong
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (30) : 3521 - 3536