Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling of the Amplex Ultrared Assay to Predict Thyroperoxidase Inhibitory Activity

被引:6
|
作者
Gadaleta, Domenico [1 ]
D'Alessandro, Luca [1 ]
Marzo, Marco [1 ]
Benfenati, Emilio [1 ]
Roncaglioni, Alessandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Ric Farmacol Mario Negri IRCCS, Lab Environm Chem & Toxicol, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Milan, Italy
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
thyroid; thyroperoxidase; TPO; endocrine disruptors (E; D; QSAR; non-testing methods; THYROID-HORMONE;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2021.713037
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The thyroid system plays a major role in the regulation of several physiological processes. The dysregulation of the thyroid system caused by the interference of xenobiotics and contaminants may bring to pathologies like hyper- and hypothyroidism and it has been recently correlated with adverse outcomes leading to cancer, obesity, diabetes and neurodevelopmental disorders. Thyroid disruption can occur at several levels. For example, the inhibition of thyroperoxidase (TPO) enzyme, which catalyses the synthesis of thyroid hormones, may cause dysfunctions related to hypothyroidism. The inhibition of the TPO enzyme can occur as a consequence of prolonged exposure to chemical compounds, for this reason it is of utmost importance to identify alternative methods to evaluate the large amount of pollutants and other chemicals that may pose a potential hazard to the human health. In this work, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the TPO inhibitory potential of chemicals are presented. Models are developed by means of several machine learning and data selection approaches, and are based on data obtained in vitro with the Amplex UltraRed-thyroperoxidase (AUR-TPO) assay. Balancing methods and feature selection are applied during model development. Models are rigorously evaluated through internal and external validation. Based on validation results, two models based on Balanced Random Forest (BRF) and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) algorithms were selected for a further validation phase, that leads predictive performance (BA = 0.76-0.78 on external data) that is comparable with the reported experimental variability of the AUR-TPO assay (BA similar to 0.70). Finally, a consensus between the two models was proposed (BA = 0.82). Based on the predictive performance, these models can be considered suitable for toxicity screening of environmental chemicals.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sorption and Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR)
    Sabljic, Aleksandar
    Nakagawa, Yoshiaki
    NON-FIRST ORDER DEGRADATION AND TIME-DEPENDENT SORPTION OF ORGANIC CHEMICALS IN SOIL, 2014, 1174 : 85 - +
  • [42] Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration
    Matsumoto, Katsuhisa
    Miyao, Tomoyuki
    Funatsu, Kimito
    ACS OMEGA, 2021, 6 (18): : 11964 - 11973
  • [43] Quantitative structure-activity relationship studies on acetylcholinesterase enzyme inhibitory effects of Amaryllidaceae alkaloids
    Elgorashi, E. E.
    Malan, S. F.
    Stafford, G. I.
    van Staden, J.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2006, 72 (02) : 224 - 231
  • [44] Structure-based quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of estrogen receptor β-ligands
    Dong, Xialan
    Hilliard, Solomon G.
    Zheng, Weifan
    FUTURE MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 3 (08) : 933 - 945
  • [45] Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling of Rat Acute Toxicity by Oral Exposure
    Zhu, Hao
    Martin, Todd M.
    Ye, Lin
    Sedykh, Alexander
    Young, Douglas M.
    Tropsha, Alexander
    CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2009, 22 (12) : 1913 - 1921
  • [46] Topological regression as an interpretable and efficient tool for quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling
    Zhang, Ruibo
    Nolte, Daniel
    Sanchez-Villalobos, Cesar
    Ghosh, Souparno
    Pal, Ranadip
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [47] 4D-quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling: making a comeback
    Fourches, Denis
    Ash, Jeremy
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY, 2019, 14 (12) : 1227 - 1235
  • [48] Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of mosquito repellents using calculated descriptors
    Natarajan, Ramanathan
    Basak, Subhash C.
    Mills, Denise
    Kraker, Jessica J.
    Hawkins, Douglas M.
    CROATICA CHEMICA ACTA, 2008, 81 (02) : 333 - 340
  • [49] Validation of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Modeling Predictions of In Vitro Mutagenicity
    Charlebois, M.
    Kulkarni, S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2015, 56 : S86 - S86
  • [50] COMP 254-Workflows based quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling
    Dogra, Shaillay Kumar
    Hariharan, Ramesh
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 234