Avoiding common pitfalls when clustering biological data

被引:100
|
作者
Ronan, Tom [1 ]
Qi, Zhijie [1 ]
Naegle, Kristen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Ctr Biol Syst Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
CLINICALLY RELEVANT SUBTYPES; GENE-EXPRESSION DATA; VALIDATION; DISCOVERY; PHOSPHORYLATION; STABILITY; PATTERNS; RATES;
D O I
10.1126/scisignal.aad1932
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Clustering is an unsupervised learning method, which groups data points based on similarity, and is used to reveal the underlying structure of data. This computational approach is essential to understanding and visualizing the complex data that are acquired in high-throughput multidimensional biological experiments. Clustering enables researchers to make biological inferences for further experiments. Although a powerful technique, inappropriate application can lead biological researchers to waste resources and time in experimental follow-up. We review common pitfalls identified from the published molecular biology literature and present methods to avoid them. Commonly encountered pitfalls relate to the high-dimensional nature of biological data from high-throughput experiments, the failure to consider more than one clustering method for a given problem, and the difficulty in determining whether clustering has produced meaningful results. We present concrete examples of problems and solutions (clustering results) in the form of toy problems and real biological data for these issues. We also discuss ensemble clustering as an easy-to-implement method that enables the exploration of multiple clustering solutions and improves robustness of clustering solutions. Increased awareness of common clustering pitfalls will help researchers avoid overinterpreting or misinterpreting the results and missing valuable insights when clustering biological data.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Avoiding Some Common Preprocessing Pitfalls with Feature Queries
    Jarzabek, Stan
    Xue, Yinxing
    Zhang, Hongyu
    Lee, Youpeng
    APSEC 09: SIXTEENTH ASIA-PACIFIC SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 283 - +
  • [22] Avoiding the most common vulnerability-management pitfalls
    Lim M.
    Network Security, 2020, 2020 (07) : 12 - 14
  • [23] Avoiding pitfalls in estimating heritability with the common options approach
    Etienne Danchin
    Eric Wajnberg
    Richard H. Wagner
    Scientific Reports, 4
  • [24] AVOIDING COMMON PITFALLS IN AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION PROGRAMS
    CUNNINGHAM, J
    PERSONNEL JOURNAL, 1976, 55 (03) : 125 - &
  • [25] Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls
    Powell, AE
    Davies, HTO
    Thomson, RG
    QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 (02): : 122 - 128
  • [26] The behavioral event interview: Avoiding interviewing pitfalls when hiring
    Fernandez, Claudia S. P.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2006, 12 (06): : 590 - 593
  • [27] Avoiding pitfalls when using information-theoretic methods
    Anderson, DR
    Burnham, KP
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2002, 66 (03): : 912 - 918
  • [28] Avoiding Pitfalls When Combining Multiple Imputation and Propensity Scores
    Granger, Emily
    Lunt, Mark
    Sergeant, Jamie C.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 : 23 - 23
  • [29] Avoiding the Most Frequent Pitfalls When Synchronizing Traffic Signals
    Forbes, Jim
    Lalani, Nazir
    Gunterson, Kristop her
    ITE JOURNAL-INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, 2024, 94 (12):
  • [30] Avoiding pitfalls when combining multiple imputation and propensity scores
    Granger, Emily
    Sergeant, Jamie C.
    Lunt, Mark
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (26) : 5120 - 5132