Avoiding common pitfalls when clustering biological data

被引:100
|
作者
Ronan, Tom [1 ]
Qi, Zhijie [1 ]
Naegle, Kristen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Ctr Biol Syst Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
CLINICALLY RELEVANT SUBTYPES; GENE-EXPRESSION DATA; VALIDATION; DISCOVERY; PHOSPHORYLATION; STABILITY; PATTERNS; RATES;
D O I
10.1126/scisignal.aad1932
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Clustering is an unsupervised learning method, which groups data points based on similarity, and is used to reveal the underlying structure of data. This computational approach is essential to understanding and visualizing the complex data that are acquired in high-throughput multidimensional biological experiments. Clustering enables researchers to make biological inferences for further experiments. Although a powerful technique, inappropriate application can lead biological researchers to waste resources and time in experimental follow-up. We review common pitfalls identified from the published molecular biology literature and present methods to avoid them. Commonly encountered pitfalls relate to the high-dimensional nature of biological data from high-throughput experiments, the failure to consider more than one clustering method for a given problem, and the difficulty in determining whether clustering has produced meaningful results. We present concrete examples of problems and solutions (clustering results) in the form of toy problems and real biological data for these issues. We also discuss ensemble clustering as an easy-to-implement method that enables the exploration of multiple clustering solutions and improves robustness of clustering solutions. Increased awareness of common clustering pitfalls will help researchers avoid overinterpreting or misinterpreting the results and missing valuable insights when clustering biological data.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Accounting for noise when clustering biological data
    Sloutsky, Roman
    Jimenez, Nicolas
    Swamidass, S. Joshua
    Naegle, Kristen M.
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 14 (04) : 423 - 436
  • [12] Writing for publication - Avoiding common ethical pitfalls
    Siedlecki, Sandra L.
    Montague, Mary
    Schultz, Joann
    JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2008, 35 (02) : 147 - 150
  • [13] AVOIDING THE PITFALLS WHEN HIRING CONTRACT PERSONNEL
    ALIE, RE
    PERSONNEL, 1985, 62 (12) : 37 - 40
  • [14] AVOIDING PITFALLS WHEN INSTALLING SPECULAR REFLECTORS
    AUDIN, L
    ARCHITECTURAL RECORD, 1992, : 24 - 24
  • [15] Avoiding common pitfalls in mixed methods research?
    O'Sullivan, Patricia
    Kuper, Ayelet
    Cleland, Jennifer
    ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2024, 29 (04) : 1071 - 1073
  • [16] Managing difficult labor: Avoiding common pitfalls
    Warenski, JC
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 40 (03): : 525 - 532
  • [17] Understanding Statistical Significance and Avoiding Common Pitfalls
    Robinson, R.
    Haviland, J. S.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 33 (12) : 804 - 806
  • [18] Avoiding common pitfalls of manuscript and figure preparation
    Collins, Suil
    Gemayel, Rita
    Chenette, Emily J.
    FEBS JOURNAL, 2017, 284 (09) : 1262 - 1266
  • [19] When Medicine Reverses Itself: Avoiding Practice Pitfalls
    Wellbery, Caroline
    McAteer, Rebecca
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2013, 88 (11) : 733 - +
  • [20] Avoiding pitfalls in estimating heritability with the common options approach
    Danchin, Etienne
    Wajnberg, Eric
    Wagner, Richard H.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2014, 4