Anal sphincter reconstruction by dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal resection for cancer

被引:33
|
作者
Rouanet, P [2 ]
Senesse, P
Bouamrirene, D
Toureille, E
Veyrac, M
Astre, C
Bacou, F
机构
[1] Ctr Val Aurelle, Inst Gastrointestinal Dis, F-34298 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Ctr Val Aurelle, Montpellier Canc Inst, INRA, F-34298 Montpellier, France
关键词
abdominoperineal resection; cancer; sphincter reconstruction; dynamic graciloplasty; functional outcome; quality of life;
D O I
10.1007/BF02234165
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: Chronic low-frequency electrical stimulation can safely transform fatiguing muscle into fatigue-resistant muscle. This fundamental discovery was used to reconstruct the anal sphincter. Dynamic graciloplasty was found to be effective in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Our study was undertaken to investigate the oncologic, functional, and quality of life results of dynamic graciloplasty anal reconstruction after an abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma. METHODS: Between April 1993 and April 1996, nine patients (4 males) with a median age of 51.2 (range, 29-69) years underwent an abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma (4 had a rectal adenocarcinoma and 5 had an epidermoidal anal tumor) and an anal sphincter reconstruction with electrically stimulated graciloplasty. Oncologic and functional results were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 32 (range, 14-50) months. A quality of life questionnaire was filled out by seven patients. RESULTS: Sphincter reconstruction required the same hospitalization period as abdominoperineal resection. Two patients died from evolutive disease. Three patients were operated on twice, one for immediate colonic necrosis, two for colonic perforation after enema. One of them refused the graciloplasty and had an abdominoperineal resection. Six patients were dysfunctioned. The mean resting pressure was 24 +/- 10 mmHg, and the mean pressure during stimulation was 95 +/- 25 mmHg. Five patients were continent for solids and liquid; four wore less than three pads per day, and one wore more than three. Four patients used enemas twice a week; one patient had spontaneous evacuation. The quality of life questionnaire showed that the mean scores for social interaction, symptoms, and psychological and physical states were 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, and 2.7, respectively. The mean value was 1.5. CONCLUSIONS: Total anorectal reconstruction with dynamic graciloplasty is an oncologically safe procedure. Functional results improve with time, but careful patient selection guarantees a successful functional outcome. Technical progress is necessary to improve the quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 456
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Secondary implantation of an artificial sphincter after abdominoperineal resection and pseudocontinent perineal colostomy for rectal cancer
    Marchal, F
    Doucet, C
    Lechaux, D
    Lasser, P
    Lehur, PA
    GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2005, 29 (04): : 425 - 428
  • [42] Abdominoperineal resection in anal cancer: Reconstruction of the perineum with a myocutaneous flap from the anterior rectus abdominis muscle
    Casal Nunez, Jose Enrique
    Caceres Alvarado, Nieves
    de Sanildefonso Pereira, Alberto
    Toscano Novelle, M. Angeles
    Garcia Martinez, M. Teresa
    Jove Albores, Patricia
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2011, 89 (01): : 31 - 36
  • [43] FUNCTIONAL ANAL-SPHINCTER RECONSTRUCTION WITH THE GRACILIS MUSCLE AFTER ABDOMINO-PERINEAL RESECTION
    WEE, JTK
    WONG, CSK
    LANCET, 1983, 2 (8361): : 1245 - 1246
  • [44] Anorectal reconstruction by colo-perineal anastomosis and dynamic double graciloplasty after abdominoperitoneal resection.
    Rullier, E
    Laurent, C
    Zerbib, F
    Garrelon, JL
    Caudry, M
    Saric, J
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 1998, 52 (09): : 905 - 912
  • [45] Restoration of anal sphincter function by single-stage dynamic graciloplasty with a modified (split sling) technique
    Rosen, HR
    Novi, G
    Zoech, G
    Feil, W
    Urbarz, C
    Schiessel, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 175 (03): : 187 - 193
  • [46] Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and myocutaneous flap reconstruction for anal fistula cancer arising from complicated anal fistula: two case reports
    Kuroiwa, Hidemichi
    Nakamura, Yuki
    Matsuda, Kenji
    Iwamoto, Hiromitsu
    Mitani, Yasuyuki
    Shimomura, Kazuki
    Takemoto, Norio
    Sakanaka, Toshihiro
    Tamiya, Masato
    Hyo, Takahiko
    Kawai, Manabu
    SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [47] ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION WITH SPHINCTER PRESERVATION FOR CARCINOMA OF THE MIDRECTUM
    WAUGH, JM
    MILLER, EM
    KURZWEG, FT
    AMA ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1954, 68 (04): : 469 - 485
  • [48] A systematic review of outcomes after salvage abdominoperineal resection for persistent or recurrent anal squamous cell cancer
    Ko, G.
    Sarkaria, A.
    Merchant, S. J.
    Booth, C. M.
    Patel, S. V.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 21 (06) : 632 - 650
  • [49] Comparison of quality of life after abdominoperineal resection or colo-anal anastomosis for low rectal cancer
    Baradi, H
    Delaney, CP
    Lavery, IC
    Xu, M
    Baeslach, C
    Fazio, VW
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (04) : 572 - 572
  • [50] Patients' preferences for sphincter preservation versus abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer
    Lee, Lawrence
    Trepanier, Maude
    Renaud, Julien
    Liberman, Sender
    Charlebois, Patrick
    Stein, Barry
    Fried, Gerald M.
    Fiore Jr, Julio
    Feldman, Liane S.
    SURGERY, 2021, 169 (03) : 623 - 628