Anal sphincter reconstruction by dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal resection for cancer

被引:33
|
作者
Rouanet, P [2 ]
Senesse, P
Bouamrirene, D
Toureille, E
Veyrac, M
Astre, C
Bacou, F
机构
[1] Ctr Val Aurelle, Inst Gastrointestinal Dis, F-34298 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Ctr Val Aurelle, Montpellier Canc Inst, INRA, F-34298 Montpellier, France
关键词
abdominoperineal resection; cancer; sphincter reconstruction; dynamic graciloplasty; functional outcome; quality of life;
D O I
10.1007/BF02234165
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: Chronic low-frequency electrical stimulation can safely transform fatiguing muscle into fatigue-resistant muscle. This fundamental discovery was used to reconstruct the anal sphincter. Dynamic graciloplasty was found to be effective in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Our study was undertaken to investigate the oncologic, functional, and quality of life results of dynamic graciloplasty anal reconstruction after an abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma. METHODS: Between April 1993 and April 1996, nine patients (4 males) with a median age of 51.2 (range, 29-69) years underwent an abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma (4 had a rectal adenocarcinoma and 5 had an epidermoidal anal tumor) and an anal sphincter reconstruction with electrically stimulated graciloplasty. Oncologic and functional results were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 32 (range, 14-50) months. A quality of life questionnaire was filled out by seven patients. RESULTS: Sphincter reconstruction required the same hospitalization period as abdominoperineal resection. Two patients died from evolutive disease. Three patients were operated on twice, one for immediate colonic necrosis, two for colonic perforation after enema. One of them refused the graciloplasty and had an abdominoperineal resection. Six patients were dysfunctioned. The mean resting pressure was 24 +/- 10 mmHg, and the mean pressure during stimulation was 95 +/- 25 mmHg. Five patients were continent for solids and liquid; four wore less than three pads per day, and one wore more than three. Four patients used enemas twice a week; one patient had spontaneous evacuation. The quality of life questionnaire showed that the mean scores for social interaction, symptoms, and psychological and physical states were 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, and 2.7, respectively. The mean value was 1.5. CONCLUSIONS: Total anorectal reconstruction with dynamic graciloplasty is an oncologically safe procedure. Functional results improve with time, but careful patient selection guarantees a successful functional outcome. Technical progress is necessary to improve the quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 456
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Late results of systematic malone appendicostorny adjunction to double graciloplasty in the total perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer
    Orabi, N. Abbes
    Mauel, E.
    Vanwymersch, T.
    Crispin, B.
    Ykman, O.
    Detry, R.
    Kartheuser, A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (05) : 744 - 745
  • [22] Anal sphincter restoration using dynamic graciloplasty -: results of 50 patients
    Rosen, HR
    Ausch, C
    Novi, G
    Zöch, G
    Feil, W
    Schiessel, R
    CHIRURG, 1999, 70 (04): : 469 - 475
  • [23] Total perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: long-term results of dynamic graciloplasty with Malone appendicostomy
    Orabi, N. Abbes
    Vanwymersch, T.
    Paterson, H. M.
    Mauel, E.
    Jamart, J.
    Crispin, B.
    Kartheuser, A.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 13 (04) : 406 - 413
  • [24] Salvage abdominoperineal resection in anal epidermoid cancer
    Nilsson, PJ
    Svensson, C
    Goldman, S
    Glimelius, B
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (11) : 1425 - 1429
  • [25] Reconstruction of the Urethral Sphincter with Dynamic Graciloplasty in a Male Rabbit Model
    Uchikawa-Tani, Yumiko
    Yazawa, Masaki
    Sakuma, Hisashi
    Hikosaka, Makoto
    Takayama, Masayoshi
    Kishi, Kazuo
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2016, 96 (02) : 217 - 222
  • [26] Salvage abdominoperineal resection in anal epidermoid cancer
    Mariani, P.
    Hanneme, A. G.
    De la Rochefordiere, A.
    Girodet, J.
    Marie-Christine, F.
    Mosseri, V.
    Salmon, R.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 : VII109 - VII109
  • [27] Anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection - Experience with double-wrap graciloplasty supported by low-frequency electrostimulation
    Cavina, E
    Seccia, M
    Banti, P
    Zocco, G
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (08) : 1010 - 1016
  • [28] Lymph node retrieval after abdominoperineal resection: A comparison of rectal and anal cancer
    Sermier, A
    Gervaz, P
    Morel, P
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 128 (04) : A798 - A798
  • [29] Sphincter preservation with chemoradiation in anal canal carcinoma - Abdominoperineal resection in selected cases?
    Grabenbauer, GG
    Matzel, KE
    Schneider, IHF
    Meyer, M
    Wittekind, C
    Matsche, B
    Hohenberger, W
    Sauer, R
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (04) : 441 - 450
  • [30] Salvage abdominoperineal resection after failure of conservative treatment in anal epidermoid cancer
    Ghouti, L
    Houvenaeghel, G
    Moutardier, V
    Giovannini, M
    Magnin, V
    Lelong, B
    Bardou, VJ
    Delpero, JR
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (01) : 16 - 22