The impact of nurses' perceptions of systems thinking on occurrence and reporting of adverse events: A cross-sectional study

被引:10
|
作者
Kakemam, Edris [1 ]
Albelbeisi, Ahmed Hassan [2 ]
Davoodabadi, Samane [2 ]
Azarmi, Mina [3 ]
Zolghadr, Fatemeh [4 ]
Mamene, Mehdi [5 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Tabriz Hlth Serv Management Res Ctr, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Econ, Int Campus TUMS IC, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth Management & Informat Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Tehran, Iran
[4] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Med Surg Nursing, Tabriz, Iran
[5] Ilam Univ Med Sci, Fac Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Nursing, Ilam, Iran
关键词
adverse events; medical error; patient safety; quality of care; systems thinking; SAFETY; ERROR;
D O I
10.1111/jonm.13524
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Aims To assess systems thinking level and its relationship with occurrence and reporting of adverse events in Iranian nurses. Background Systems thinking has recently emerged as an important element of patient safety and quality improvement in health care systems. It helps health care professionals to understand the different elements of health care systems, the interrelatedness and interdependencies of these elements in the health care systems. Methods This cross-sectional survey was carried out in 10 teaching hospitals in Tehran, Iran. A total of 511 nurses were selected using simple random sampling. Systems thinking was measured using the validated Systems Thinking Scale. Data analysis was performed by descriptive analyses, independent t test and logistic regression analysis. Results The average score for total systems thinking was a mean of 49.45 (SD = 12.10; range 0-80). In total, 67.5% of participants reported the experience of the occurrence of adverse events leading to harm to patients, and 65.2% of them responded as having appropriate adverse events reporting behaviours. Nurses who had higher scores in systems thinking were found to be more likely to report adverse events (odds ratio = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.05-1.09), whereas they were less prone to experience adverse events (odds ratio = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.95-0.98). Conclusion Our results indicated that the nurses' systems thinking level was moderate. Systems thinking had a significant role in preventing the occurrence of adverse events as well as improving the reporting of adverse events. Therefore, it is recommended to enhance the competency of nurses' systems thinking to prevent the occurrence of adverse events and to improve the reporting of adverse events. Implications for nursing management Nursing managers need to focus on the systems thinking weaknesses and the occurrence and the reporting of adverse events in policymaking, practice and research. Also, systems thinking should be integrated with the health care system for preventing the occurrence of adverse events and improving reporting of adverse events. They should support, lead and allocate the essential pragmatic strategies and resources for the involvement of all health care members in policymaking.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 490
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Impact of Social Support on Nurses' Motivation: A Cross-Sectional Study in Malaysia
    Nasurdin, Aizzat Mohd
    Tan, Cheng Ling
    Khan, Sabrina Naseer
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 32 (08) : 430 - 435
  • [42] Nursing management of the critical thinking and care quality of ICU nurses: A cross-sectional study
    Lee, Shu-Yen
    Chang, Ching-Yi
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30 (07) : 2889 - 2896
  • [43] Cosmetics utilization and associated adverse events: A community based cross-sectional study
    Kumari, Sweta
    Pal, Biplab
    Tewari, Devesh
    Sahu, Sanjeev Kumar
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 23
  • [44] The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional study
    Khamis, Assem M.
    Bou-Karroum, Lama
    Hakoum, Maram B.
    Al-Gibbawi, Mounir
    Habib, Joseph R.
    El-Jardali, Fadi
    Akl, Elie A.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16
  • [45] The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: a cross-sectional study
    Assem M. Khamis
    Lama Bou-Karroum
    Maram B. Hakoum
    Mounir Al-Gibbawi
    Joseph R. Habib
    Fadi El-Jardali
    Elie A. Akl
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 16
  • [46] Community pharmacists' challenges regarding adverse drug reaction reporting: a cross-sectional study
    Kusturica, Milica Paut
    Tomas, Ana
    Raskovic, Aleksandar
    Gigov, Slobodan
    Crnobrnja, Veljko
    Jevtic, Marija
    Stilinovic, Nebojsa
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2022, 38 (07) : 1229 - 1236
  • [47] An investigation of pharmacovigilance and reporting of adverse drug reactions in hospitals: a cross-sectional study in China
    Zhao, Zhigang
    Shen, Jiashu
    Shen, Chuanyong
    Zhu, Bin
    Sun, Jun
    Yu, Jinyang
    Sun, Feng
    Song, Haibo
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2021, 37 (11) : 2001 - 2006
  • [48] Adverse childhood experiences and the impact on pregnancy intention, a cross-sectional study
    Soldati, Elena
    Schonewille, Noralie N.
    de Ruijter, Marion C.
    Postma, Ineke R.
    van Pampus, Maria G.
    Broekman, Birit F. P.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 46 (01)
  • [49] Nurses' Perceptions of the Impact of a National Educational Program in Pediatric Oncology Nursing: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation
    Sandeberg, Margareta Af
    Olsson, Maria
    Ek, Torben
    Enskar, Karin
    Stenmarker, Margaretha
    Pergert, Pernilla
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2023, 40 (03): : 178 - 187
  • [50] Competence and perceptions of spiritual care among clinical nurses: A multicentre cross-sectional study
    Guo, Wei
    Liu, Xue
    Zhang, Yi
    Chen, Runan
    Qi, Wenqian
    Deng, Jiajia
    Cui, Jing
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024, 33 (04) : 1432 - 1443