The impact of nurses' perceptions of systems thinking on occurrence and reporting of adverse events: A cross-sectional study

被引:10
|
作者
Kakemam, Edris [1 ]
Albelbeisi, Ahmed Hassan [2 ]
Davoodabadi, Samane [2 ]
Azarmi, Mina [3 ]
Zolghadr, Fatemeh [4 ]
Mamene, Mehdi [5 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Tabriz Hlth Serv Management Res Ctr, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Econ, Int Campus TUMS IC, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth Management & Informat Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Tehran, Iran
[4] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Med Surg Nursing, Tabriz, Iran
[5] Ilam Univ Med Sci, Fac Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Nursing, Ilam, Iran
关键词
adverse events; medical error; patient safety; quality of care; systems thinking; SAFETY; ERROR;
D O I
10.1111/jonm.13524
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Aims To assess systems thinking level and its relationship with occurrence and reporting of adverse events in Iranian nurses. Background Systems thinking has recently emerged as an important element of patient safety and quality improvement in health care systems. It helps health care professionals to understand the different elements of health care systems, the interrelatedness and interdependencies of these elements in the health care systems. Methods This cross-sectional survey was carried out in 10 teaching hospitals in Tehran, Iran. A total of 511 nurses were selected using simple random sampling. Systems thinking was measured using the validated Systems Thinking Scale. Data analysis was performed by descriptive analyses, independent t test and logistic regression analysis. Results The average score for total systems thinking was a mean of 49.45 (SD = 12.10; range 0-80). In total, 67.5% of participants reported the experience of the occurrence of adverse events leading to harm to patients, and 65.2% of them responded as having appropriate adverse events reporting behaviours. Nurses who had higher scores in systems thinking were found to be more likely to report adverse events (odds ratio = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.05-1.09), whereas they were less prone to experience adverse events (odds ratio = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.95-0.98). Conclusion Our results indicated that the nurses' systems thinking level was moderate. Systems thinking had a significant role in preventing the occurrence of adverse events as well as improving the reporting of adverse events. Therefore, it is recommended to enhance the competency of nurses' systems thinking to prevent the occurrence of adverse events and to improve the reporting of adverse events. Implications for nursing management Nursing managers need to focus on the systems thinking weaknesses and the occurrence and the reporting of adverse events in policymaking, practice and research. Also, systems thinking should be integrated with the health care system for preventing the occurrence of adverse events and improving reporting of adverse events. They should support, lead and allocate the essential pragmatic strategies and resources for the involvement of all health care members in policymaking.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 490
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Adverse drug events in hospital settings: Reporting & fate at a tertiary academic hospital: Cross-sectional study
    Almetwazi, Mansour
    Alqasem, Mohammed
    AlHadlaq, Tariq
    Aljumayd, Ali
    Alreshedi, Faisal
    Mancy, Wael
    Alqahtani, Nasser
    Alhuwyail, Ghadah
    Alhawassi, Tariq
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 27 : 254 - 255
  • [12] Investigating the impact of temporary nurses on permanent nurses' commitment via perceptions of illegitimate tasks: A cross-sectional study
    Gahrmann, Caroline
    Klumb, Petra Liselotte
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2024, 80 (07) : 2835 - 2846
  • [13] Nurses' critical thinking disposition and professional commitment: a cross-sectional study
    Mahtab Allah Tavakoli
    Golnaz Foroughameri
    Jamileh Farokhzadian
    Sedigheh Khodabandeh Shahraki
    Frontiers of Nursing, 2024, (01) : 119 - 126
  • [14] Critical thinking dispositions of emergency nurses in Turkey: a cross-sectional study
    Kaya, H.
    Yalniz, N.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 19 (03) : 198 - 203
  • [15] Adverse Drug Events in Ambulatory Care: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Plasek, Joseph M.
    Amato, Mary G.
    Salem, Abigail
    Foer, Dinah
    Lipsitz, Stuart
    Jackson, Gretchen Purcell
    Bates, David W.
    Zhou, Li
    DRUG SAFETY, 2025, 48 (04) : 363 - 374
  • [16] Adverse events in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional study
    de Assis, Stefanny Furtado
    Villas Boas Vieira, Debora Feijo
    Escobar Gimenes de Sousa, Fernanda Raphael
    de Oliveira Pinheiro, Carlos Eduardo
    do Prado, Patricia Rezende
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2022, 56 : e20210481
  • [17] Nurses' perceptions of career ladder systems, job satisfaction and turnover intention: A cross-sectional study
    Ahn, Young Seon
    Choi, Jeong Sil
    NURSING OPEN, 2023, 10 (01): : 195 - 201
  • [18] Understanding reporting practices and perceptions of barriers in adverse events following immunisation surveillance: A cross-sectional survey of paediatricians in Kerala, India
    Thomas, Roshan Anna
    Joseph, Marina Rajan
    Castilloux, Anne-Marie
    Moride, Yola
    VACCINE, 2021, 39 (33) : 4678 - 4684
  • [19] A cross-sectional study: comparison of public perceptions of adverse drug reaction reporting and monitoring in eastern and western China
    Wang, Ningsheng
    Chen, Yue
    Ren, Biqi
    Xiang, Yufang
    Zhao, Nan
    Zhan, Xianyan
    Feng, Bianling
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [20] A cross-sectional study: comparison of public perceptions of adverse drug reaction reporting and monitoring in eastern and western China
    Ningsheng Wang
    Yue Chen
    Biqi Ren
    Yufang Xiang
    Nan Zhao
    Xianyan Zhan
    Bianling Feng
    BMC Health Services Research, 22