A Phase 2, Randomized, Dose-Response Trial of Taprenepag Isopropyl (PF-04217329) Versus Latanoprost 0.005% in Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension

被引:43
|
作者
Schachar, Ronald A. [1 ]
Raber, Susan [1 ]
Courtney, Rachel [1 ]
Zhang, Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Inc, Glaucoma Clin Res, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
关键词
Intraocular pressure; Open-angle glaucoma; Ocular hypertension; E(2) receptor agonist; Taprenepag isopropyl; HUMAN TRABECULAR MESHWORK; REDUCED INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; 8-ISO PROSTAGLANDIN E-2; RECEPTOR KNOCKOUT MICE; LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE; BLOOD-AQUEOUS BARRIER; RHESUS-MONKEY EYES; TOPICAL APPLICATION; EP2; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.3109/02713683.2011.593725
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the safety of escalating doses of taprenepag isopropyl (PF-04217329), a selective EP(2) receptor agonist administered as a topical ophthalmic solution, versus its vehicle (Stage I), and dose-response of taprenepag isopropyl alone and in unfixed combination with latanoprost ophthalmic solution 0.005% versus latanoprost alone (Stage II). Subjects and Methods: Randomized, vehicle-and active-controlled, double-masked, two-stage, dose-finding trial in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension; first taprenepag isopropyl study in patients (NCT00572455). Study eye: 26 mmHg <= intraocular pressure (IOP) <36 mmHg at 8 am and 22 mmHg <= IOP <36 mmHg at 10 am, 1 pm, 4 pm. Stage I: 3 cohorts (total n = 67) received 1 drop of taprenepag isopropyl unit dose formulation qPM/eye for 14 days: low dose: 0.0025%, 0.005%, vehicle; middle dose: 0.01%, 0.015%, vehicle; high dose: 0.02%, 0.03%, vehicle. Stage II: 7 groups (total n = 250) received 1 drop of taprenepag isopropyl multidose formulation qPM/eye for 28 days: 0.005%, 0.01%, 0.015% monotherapy; each in unfixed combination with latanoprost 0.005%, or latanoprost monotherapy. Main outcomes: mean change in diurnal IOP, baseline to last visit; adverse events. Results: Stage I at Day 14: statistically significantly greater IOP reductions were observed at all taprenepag isopropyl doses versus vehicle. Stage II at Day 28: statistically significantly greater IOP reductions were observed at all doses of the unfixed combination versus latanoprost monotherapy. At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event reported for 29/67 (43.3%) subjects in Stage I and 158/250 (63.2%) in Stage II. Conclusions: Taprenepag isopropyl significantly reduces IOP in POAG and ocular hypertension. Taprenepag isopropyl monotherapy is comparable to latanoprost 0.005% in reducing IOP. As demonstrated in this report, the activity of taprenepag isopropyl is additive to that of latanoprost 0.005%. Further studies are required to determine whether it shows similar additivity when administered with other ocular antihypertensive medications.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 817
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A dose-response evaluation of the ocular hypotensive effect of Levobetaxolol ophthalmic suspension in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
    Silver, LH
    Von Tress, H
    Garadi, R
    McCarty, G
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S513 - S513
  • [32] Phase 2, Randomized, Dose-finding Studies of Omidenepag Isopropyl, a Selective EP2 Agonist, in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
    Aihara, Makoto
    Lu, Fenghe
    Kawata, Hisashi
    Iwata, Akihiro
    Liu, Kathy
    Odani-Kawabata, Noriko
    Shams, Naveed K.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2019, 28 (05) : 375 - 385
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of tafluprost 0.0015% versus latanoprost 0.005% eye drops in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: 24-month results of a randomized, double-masked phase III study
    Uusitalo, Hannu
    Pillunat, Lutz E.
    Ropo, Auli
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2010, 88 (01) : 12 - 19
  • [34] MERCURY-3: a randomized comparison of netarsudil/latanoprost and bimatoprost/timolol in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension
    Ingeborg Stalmans
    Kin Sheng Lim
    Francesco Oddone
    Marek Fichtl
    Jose I. Belda
    Anton Hommer
    Guna Laganovska
    Cédric Schweitzer
    Bogomil Voykov
    Tomasz Zarnowski
    Gábor Holló
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2024, 262 : 179 - 190
  • [35] Preservative-free versus preserved latanoprost eye drops in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
    Aptel, Florent
    Choudhry, Reena
    Stalmans, Ingeborg
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2016, 32 (08) : 1457 - 1463
  • [36] Efficacy and safety of 0.0015% tafluprost versus 0.005% latanoprost in primary open angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension: a Meta-analysis
    Yang, Xi-Ting
    Zhao, Lin
    Wang, Li-Jun
    Zhong, Yi
    Liao, Ding-Ying
    Wang, Jian-Ming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 13 (03) : 474 - 480
  • [37] MERCURY-3: a randomized comparison of netarsudil/latanoprost and bimatoprost/timolol in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension
    Stalmans, Ingeborg
    Lim, Kin Sheng
    Oddone, Francesco
    Fichtl, Marek
    Belda, Jose I.
    Hommer, Anton
    Laganovska, Guna
    Schweitzer, Cedric
    Voykov, Bogomil
    Zarnowski, Tomasz
    Hollo, Gabor
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 262 (01) : 179 - 190
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of 0.0015% tafluprost versus 0.005% latanoprost in primary open angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension: a Meta-analysis
    Xi-Ting Yang
    Lin Zhao
    Li-Jun Wang
    Yi Zhang
    Ding-Ying Liao
    Jian-Ming Wang
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, (03) : 474 - 480
  • [39] A Randomized Phase 2 Trial Comparing Omidenepag Isopropyl 0.002% Once and Twice Daily in Subjects With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension (SPECTRUM-6)
    Olander, Kenneth W.
    Sato, Michelle A.
    Abrams, Marc A.
    Jerkins, Gary W.
    Lu, Fenghe
    Dinh, Phillip
    Odani-Kawabata, Noriko
    Chabi, Almira
    Shams, Naveed K.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2021, 30 (06) : 473 - 480
  • [40] A six-month, randomized, double masked study comparing latanoprost with timolol in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension
    Watson, P
    Stjernschantz, J
    Beck, L
    Blackmore, M
    Coakes, R
    Reynolds, P
    Davey, C
    HickmanCasey, J
    Elkington, A
    Luff, A
    Green, F
    Valenzuela, F
    Longstaff, S
    Currie, Z
    Mills, B
    Chatterjee, A
    Murray, S
    Nagasubramanian, S
    Potts, M
    Spencer, I
    Roxburgh, S
    Sanders, R
    Bailey, M
    Vernon, S
    Sloper, M
    Wishart, P
    Birch, M
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 103 (01) : 126 - 137