A Phase 2, Randomized, Dose-Response Trial of Taprenepag Isopropyl (PF-04217329) Versus Latanoprost 0.005% in Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension

被引:43
|
作者
Schachar, Ronald A. [1 ]
Raber, Susan [1 ]
Courtney, Rachel [1 ]
Zhang, Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Inc, Glaucoma Clin Res, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
关键词
Intraocular pressure; Open-angle glaucoma; Ocular hypertension; E(2) receptor agonist; Taprenepag isopropyl; HUMAN TRABECULAR MESHWORK; REDUCED INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; 8-ISO PROSTAGLANDIN E-2; RECEPTOR KNOCKOUT MICE; LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE; BLOOD-AQUEOUS BARRIER; RHESUS-MONKEY EYES; TOPICAL APPLICATION; EP2; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.3109/02713683.2011.593725
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the safety of escalating doses of taprenepag isopropyl (PF-04217329), a selective EP(2) receptor agonist administered as a topical ophthalmic solution, versus its vehicle (Stage I), and dose-response of taprenepag isopropyl alone and in unfixed combination with latanoprost ophthalmic solution 0.005% versus latanoprost alone (Stage II). Subjects and Methods: Randomized, vehicle-and active-controlled, double-masked, two-stage, dose-finding trial in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension; first taprenepag isopropyl study in patients (NCT00572455). Study eye: 26 mmHg <= intraocular pressure (IOP) <36 mmHg at 8 am and 22 mmHg <= IOP <36 mmHg at 10 am, 1 pm, 4 pm. Stage I: 3 cohorts (total n = 67) received 1 drop of taprenepag isopropyl unit dose formulation qPM/eye for 14 days: low dose: 0.0025%, 0.005%, vehicle; middle dose: 0.01%, 0.015%, vehicle; high dose: 0.02%, 0.03%, vehicle. Stage II: 7 groups (total n = 250) received 1 drop of taprenepag isopropyl multidose formulation qPM/eye for 28 days: 0.005%, 0.01%, 0.015% monotherapy; each in unfixed combination with latanoprost 0.005%, or latanoprost monotherapy. Main outcomes: mean change in diurnal IOP, baseline to last visit; adverse events. Results: Stage I at Day 14: statistically significantly greater IOP reductions were observed at all taprenepag isopropyl doses versus vehicle. Stage II at Day 28: statistically significantly greater IOP reductions were observed at all doses of the unfixed combination versus latanoprost monotherapy. At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event reported for 29/67 (43.3%) subjects in Stage I and 158/250 (63.2%) in Stage II. Conclusions: Taprenepag isopropyl significantly reduces IOP in POAG and ocular hypertension. Taprenepag isopropyl monotherapy is comparable to latanoprost 0.005% in reducing IOP. As demonstrated in this report, the activity of taprenepag isopropyl is additive to that of latanoprost 0.005%. Further studies are required to determine whether it shows similar additivity when administered with other ocular antihypertensive medications.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 817
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and safety of unoprostone isopropyl 0.15% and latanoprost 0.005% in adjunctive therapy to timolol maleate 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
    Pfeiffer, N
    Yannoulis, N
    Mertz, B
    Cirkel, C
    Kapik, B
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2001, 42 (04) : S820 - S820
  • [22] Randomized, Controlled, Phase 3 Trials of Carteolol/Latanoprost Fixed Combination in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
    Yamamoto, Tetsuya
    Ikegami, Toru
    Ishikawa, Yuji
    Kikuchi, Satoru
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 171 : 35 - 46
  • [23] Open-Label Extension Study Comparing Latanoprost 0.005% Without vs With Benzalkonium Chloride in Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
    Lee, Bridgitte Shen
    Malhotra, Ranjan
    Sall, Kenneth
    Mitchell, Brittany
    Peace, James
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 16 : 2285 - 2293
  • [24] Randomized Trial of Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Versus Brinzolamide Plus Brimonidine for Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
    Stefano A. Gandolfi
    John Lim
    Ana Cristina Sanseau
    Juan Camilo Parra Restrepo
    Thomas Hamacher
    Advances in Therapy, 2014, 31 : 1213 - 1227
  • [25] Randomized Trial of Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Versus Brinzolamide Plus Brimonidine for Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
    Gandolfi, Stefano A.
    Lim, John
    Cristina Sanseau, Ana
    Parra Restrepo, Juan Camilo
    Hamacher, Thomas
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2014, 31 (12) : 1213 - 1227
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of newly developed preservative-free latanoprost 0.005% eye drops versus preserved latanoprost 0.005% in open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: 12-week results of a randomized,multicenter, controlled phase Ⅲ trial
    Joon Mo Kim
    Kyung Rim Sung
    Ji Woong Lee
    Haksu Kyung
    Seungsoo Rho
    Chan Yun Kim
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2021, 14 (10) : 1539 - 1547
  • [27] Unpreserved latanoprost in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. A multicenter, randomized, controlled study
    Denis, P.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2016, 39 (07): : 622 - 630
  • [28] Long-term safety evaluation of latanoprost 0.005% without benzalkonium chloride in patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension
    Lee, Bridgitte Shen
    Malhotra, Rajan
    Sall, Kenneth N.
    Ogundele, Abayomi
    Peace, James
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of newly developed preservative-free latanoprost 0.005% eye drops versus preserved latanoprost 0.005% in open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: 12-week results of a randomized, multicenter, controlled phase III trial
    Kim, Joon Mo
    Sung, Kyung Rim
    Lee, Ji Woong
    Kyung, Haksu
    Rho, Seungsoo
    Kim, Chan Yun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 14 (10) : 1539 - 1547
  • [30] Comparison of clinical effects of two latanoprost 0.005% solutions (Xalatan® and Arulatan®) in primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertensive patients: a randomized clinical trial
    Brant Fernandes, Rodrigo A.
    Silva, Luci Meire P.
    Dias, Diego Torres
    Pereira, Rafael Henrique
    Belfort Jr, Rubens
    Prata, Tiago Santos
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 13 : 679 - 684