Remifentanil compared with morphine for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia after major abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

被引:24
|
作者
Kucukemre, F
Kunt, N [1 ]
Kaygusuz, K
Kiliccioglu, F
Gurelik, B
Cetin, A
机构
[1] Cumhuriyet Univ Sch Med, Dept Anaesthesiol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey
[2] Eskisehir State Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Eskisehir, Turkey
[3] Cumhuriyet Univ Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey
关键词
analgesia; patient-controlled; analgesics; remifentanil; opioid; morphine; pain; postoperative; surgery; abdominal;
D O I
10.1017/S0265021505000657
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and objective: This randomized, double-blinded clinical study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of remifentanil and morphine administered using intravenous (i.v.) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery during the first 24 postoperative hours. Methods: Sixty-nine patients were randomly allocated into two groups, each receiving remifentanil or morphine. The first group received i.v. remifentanil PCA with a loading dose of 45 mu g, a maintenance dose of mu g min(-1), a bolus dose of 15 mu g and a lockout interval of 10 min during the first 24 postoperative hours. The second group received i.v. morphine PCA with a loading dose of 5 mg, a maintenance dose of 0.3 mg h(-1), a bolus dose of I mg and a lockout interval of 15 min. Age, weight, sex, history of general anaesthesia, duration of surgery and time spent in the post-anaesthesia care unit were recorded. Preoperative pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BP), respiration rate and arterial blood gases were collected. Pulmonary function was tested before induction of anaesthesia, as well as at 4 and 26 h after operation. Pulse rate, systolic and diastolic BP, respiration rate, arterial blood gases, sedation and visual analogue scores, and presence of side-effects in the recovery room and on the ward for 24 h were recorded at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h after operation. Total drug use, number of boluses delivered, number of boluses demanded and delivery/demand ratio were collected. Results: Sixty patients were evaluated. The groups did not differ in age, weight, sex, history of general anaesthesia, duration of surgery or time spent in the recovery unit. There were also no clinically relevant differences between the groups with regard to haemodynamic and respiratory parameters as well as sedation and visual analogue scores (P > 0.05). More bolus doses were demanded and delivered and the delivery/demand ratio was significantly higher in the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). There was no finding suggesting acute opioid tolerance during remifentanil or morphine PCA. Conclusion: The i.v. remifentanil PCA with the chosen dosage regimen after abdominal surgery produces postoperative analgesia and has cardiovascular side-effects similar to those achieved with i.v. morphine. Special attention must be given to respiratory depression during establishment of PCA with remifentanil.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 385
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in postoperative analgesia after upper extremity surgery
    Tuncer S.
    Tosun Z.
    Yosunkaya A.
    Reisli R.
    Sentürk S.
    Savaci N.
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2002, 25 (3) : 149 - 151
  • [22] Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia effect-site target-controlled infusion compared with morphine patient-controlled analgesia for treatment of acute pain after uterine artery embolization
    Lipszyc, M.
    Winters, E.
    Engelman, E.
    Baurain, M.
    Barvais, L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (05) : 724 - 731
  • [23] Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia following cardiac surgery
    Krishnan, K
    Elliot, SC
    Berridge, JC
    Mallick, A
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 49 (06) : 876 - 879
  • [24] MORPHINE VS FENTANYL/MORPHINE FOR PATIENT-CONTROLLED EPIDURAL ANALGESIA (EPCA) AFTER ABDOMINAL-SURGERY
    CHRUBASIK, J
    CHRUBASIK, S
    PFISTERER, M
    HAGE, R
    MARTIN, E
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1994, 78 (02): : U43 - U43
  • [25] A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia to Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Control and Recovery After Major Open Gynecologic Cancer Surgery EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Ferguson, Sarah E.
    Malhotra, Tim
    Seshan, Venkatraman E.
    Levine, Douglas A.
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Barakat, Richard R.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2009, 64 (10) : 654 - 655
  • [26] A placebo-controlled trial of midazolam as an adjunct to morphine patient-controlled analgesia after spinal surgery
    Day, Melissa A.
    Rich, Martha Anne
    Thorn, Beverly E.
    Berbaum, Michael L.
    Mangieri, Eugene A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2014, 26 (04) : 300 - 308
  • [27] Comparison of analgesic effects of morphine, fentanyl, and remifentanil with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after cardiac surgery
    Gurbet, A
    Goren, S
    Sahin, S
    Uckunkaya, N
    Korfali, G
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2004, 18 (06) : 755 - 758
  • [28] Postoperative pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery in elderly patients and its association with patient-controlled analgesia
    He, Qiulan
    Lai, Zhenyi
    Peng, Senyi
    Lin, Shiqing
    Mo, Guohui
    Zhao, Xu
    Wang, Zhongxing
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [29] Patient-Controlled Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System Improved Postoperative Mobility Compared to Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia Morphine: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials
    Oliashirazi, Ali
    Wilson-Byrne, Timothy
    Shuler, Franklin D.
    Parvizi, Javad
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2017, 17 (02) : 197 - 207
  • [30] A prospective randomized trial of nebulized morphine compared with patient-controlled analgesia morphine in the management of acute thoracic pain
    Fulda, GJ
    Giberson, F
    Fagraeus, L
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 59 (02): : 382 - 387