Remifentanil compared with morphine for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia after major abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

被引:24
|
作者
Kucukemre, F
Kunt, N [1 ]
Kaygusuz, K
Kiliccioglu, F
Gurelik, B
Cetin, A
机构
[1] Cumhuriyet Univ Sch Med, Dept Anaesthesiol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey
[2] Eskisehir State Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Eskisehir, Turkey
[3] Cumhuriyet Univ Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey
关键词
analgesia; patient-controlled; analgesics; remifentanil; opioid; morphine; pain; postoperative; surgery; abdominal;
D O I
10.1017/S0265021505000657
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and objective: This randomized, double-blinded clinical study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of remifentanil and morphine administered using intravenous (i.v.) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery during the first 24 postoperative hours. Methods: Sixty-nine patients were randomly allocated into two groups, each receiving remifentanil or morphine. The first group received i.v. remifentanil PCA with a loading dose of 45 mu g, a maintenance dose of mu g min(-1), a bolus dose of 15 mu g and a lockout interval of 10 min during the first 24 postoperative hours. The second group received i.v. morphine PCA with a loading dose of 5 mg, a maintenance dose of 0.3 mg h(-1), a bolus dose of I mg and a lockout interval of 15 min. Age, weight, sex, history of general anaesthesia, duration of surgery and time spent in the post-anaesthesia care unit were recorded. Preoperative pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BP), respiration rate and arterial blood gases were collected. Pulmonary function was tested before induction of anaesthesia, as well as at 4 and 26 h after operation. Pulse rate, systolic and diastolic BP, respiration rate, arterial blood gases, sedation and visual analogue scores, and presence of side-effects in the recovery room and on the ward for 24 h were recorded at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h after operation. Total drug use, number of boluses delivered, number of boluses demanded and delivery/demand ratio were collected. Results: Sixty patients were evaluated. The groups did not differ in age, weight, sex, history of general anaesthesia, duration of surgery or time spent in the recovery unit. There were also no clinically relevant differences between the groups with regard to haemodynamic and respiratory parameters as well as sedation and visual analogue scores (P > 0.05). More bolus doses were demanded and delivered and the delivery/demand ratio was significantly higher in the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). There was no finding suggesting acute opioid tolerance during remifentanil or morphine PCA. Conclusion: The i.v. remifentanil PCA with the chosen dosage regimen after abdominal surgery produces postoperative analgesia and has cardiovascular side-effects similar to those achieved with i.v. morphine. Special attention must be given to respiratory depression during establishment of PCA with remifentanil.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 385
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A comparison of 0.1% and 0.2% ropivacaine and bupivacaine combined with morphine for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery
    Senard, M
    Joris, JL
    Ledoux, D
    Toussaint, PJ
    Lahaye-Goffart, B
    Lamy, ML
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (02): : 444 - 449
  • [12] Morphine patient-controlled analgesia is superior to meperidine patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain
    Plummer, JL
    Owen, H
    Ilsley, AH
    Inglis, S
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (04): : 794 - 799
  • [13] A prospective randomized trial comparing patient-controlled epidural analgesia to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain control and recovery after major open gynecologic cancer surgery
    Ferguson, Sarah E.
    Malhotra, Tim
    Seshan, Venkatraman E.
    Levine, Douglas A.
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Barakat, Richard R.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (01) : 111 - 116
  • [14] The addition of a tramadol infusion to morphine patient-controlled analgesia after abdominal surgery: A double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial
    Webb, AR
    Leong, S
    Myles, PS
    Burn, SJ
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (06): : 1713 - 1718
  • [15] A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Respiratory Effects of Patient-Controlled Intravenous Remifentanil Analgesia and Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia in Laboring Women
    Stocki, Daniel
    Matot, Idit
    Einav, Sharon
    Eventov-Friedman, Smadar
    Ginosar, Yehuda
    Weiniger, Carolyn F.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2014, 118 (03): : 589 - 597
  • [16] Sublingual buprenorphine compared to morphine delivered by a patient-controlled analgesia system as postoperative analgesia after prostatectomy
    Gaitini, L
    Moskovitz, B
    Katz, E
    Vaisberg, A
    Vaida, A
    Nativ, I
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1996, 57 (04) : 227 - 229
  • [17] Prospective Randomized Trial of Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Ketamine and Morphine or Morphine Alone after Hysterectomy
    Lo, Anita
    Macpherson, Nicola
    Spiwak, Rae
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2008, 61 (05): : 334 - 339
  • [18] A Comparison of the Effects of Epidural Levobupivacaine and Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia Following Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rangapriya, Aravindan
    Venkatraman, Rajagopalan
    Karthik, Mani
    Preethi, Anandpandi
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [19] Controlled Trial of Morphine vs Hydromorphone for Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Children with Postoperative Pain
    Karl, Helen W.
    Tyler, Donald C.
    Miser, Angela W.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2012, 13 (12) : 1658 - 1659
  • [20] Oral analgesia compared with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain after cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial
    Davis, KM
    Esposito, MA
    Meyer, BA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 194 (04) : 967 - 971