Do corporations learn from mispricing? Evidence from takeovers and corporate performance

被引:3
|
作者
Adra, Samer [1 ]
Barbopoulos, Leonidas G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Business Sch, Edgbaston Pk Rd, Birmingham B15 2TY, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch, Univ Ave, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Mispricing; Information; Acquisitions; Acquirer returns; Corporate profits; LONG-TERM-MEMORY; STOCK-MARKET; HURST EXPONENT; MERGER; INVESTMENT; EFFICIENCY; VALUATION; RANGE; FIRMS; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2017.08.006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this article we form the simple prediction that mispricing encourages traders to collect costly information that guides managerial decisions at corporate level. Our findings support this prediction based on evidence derived from both the US market for corporate control and the overall variation in aggregate corporate profits. The trading activity in response to the temporary mispricing of the merging companies provides useful information that leads to the design of high-synergy deals. Such synergies are reflected in an increase in the announcement period acquirer abnormal returns and are not reversed in the long-run. At the market-wide level, our results suggest that the growth in the overall stock trading volume in response to market mispricing is associated with high future corporate profit growth. Overall, after controlling for several economic and financial conditions, the temporary mispricing in a developed and generally efficient stock market stimulates informative trading, ultimately leading to value- and performance-enhancing corporate decisions. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Do Government Environmental Subsidies Improve Corporate Carbon Performance? Evidence From China
    Luo, Xiying
    Liu, Xin
    Liu, Wei
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 33 (02): : 217 - 242
  • [42] Do CEO Rhetorical Strategies Affect Corporate Social Performance? Evidence from China
    Liu, Chang
    Chen, Shouming
    Shao, Qiuyue
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (18)
  • [43] DO GREEN FUNDS CONTRIBUTE TO CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM CHINA
    Chen, Lin
    Johari, Jalila Binti
    Said, Ridzwana Mohd
    TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2024, 23 (01): : 259 - 280
  • [44] Does the Disposition Effect Matter in Corporate Takeovers? Evidence from Institutional Investors of Target Companies
    Ye, Pengfei
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2014, 49 (01) : 221 - 248
  • [45] Does information content of a corporate social responsibility report matter for stock mispricing? Evidence from China
    Wu, Di
    Sun, Qian
    Zhang, Wenyu
    Xu, Guanghua
    Chan, Kam C.
    Qin, Jie
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 95
  • [46] How do women on corporate boards shape corporate social performance? Evidence drawn from semiparametric regression
    Dang, Rey
    Hikkerova, Lubica
    Simioni, Michel
    Sahut, Jean-Michel
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2023, 330 (1-2) : 361 - 388
  • [47] Do corporate lawyers matter? Evidence from patents
    Andriosopoulos, Dimitris
    Czarnowski, Pawel
    Marshall, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2023, 83
  • [48] How do women on corporate boards shape corporate social performance? Evidence drawn from semiparametric regression
    Rey Đặng
    Lubica Hikkerova
    Michel Simioni
    Jean-Michel Sahut
    Annals of Operations Research, 2023, 330 : 361 - 388
  • [49] Do Investors Learn from Experience? Evidence from Frequent IPO Investors
    Chiang, Yao-Min
    Hirshleifer, David
    Qian, Yiming
    Sherman, Ann E.
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2011, 24 (05): : 1560 - 1589
  • [50] Whoever said corporations do not care? Evidence of CSR from India
    Garg, Ritam
    Ambrosius, Judith
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDIAN CULTURE AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2018, 16 (02) : 206 - 222