Do corporations learn from mispricing? Evidence from takeovers and corporate performance

被引:3
|
作者
Adra, Samer [1 ]
Barbopoulos, Leonidas G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Business Sch, Edgbaston Pk Rd, Birmingham B15 2TY, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch, Univ Ave, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Mispricing; Information; Acquisitions; Acquirer returns; Corporate profits; LONG-TERM-MEMORY; STOCK-MARKET; HURST EXPONENT; MERGER; INVESTMENT; EFFICIENCY; VALUATION; RANGE; FIRMS; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2017.08.006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this article we form the simple prediction that mispricing encourages traders to collect costly information that guides managerial decisions at corporate level. Our findings support this prediction based on evidence derived from both the US market for corporate control and the overall variation in aggregate corporate profits. The trading activity in response to the temporary mispricing of the merging companies provides useful information that leads to the design of high-synergy deals. Such synergies are reflected in an increase in the announcement period acquirer abnormal returns and are not reversed in the long-run. At the market-wide level, our results suggest that the growth in the overall stock trading volume in response to market mispricing is associated with high future corporate profit growth. Overall, after controlling for several economic and financial conditions, the temporary mispricing in a developed and generally efficient stock market stimulates informative trading, ultimately leading to value- and performance-enhancing corporate decisions. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Do Classified Boards Deter Takeovers? Evidence from Merger Waves
    John, Kose
    Kadyrzhanova, Dalida
    Lee, Sangho
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2024, 59 (02) : 759 - 795
  • [23] DOES STOCK MISPRICING AFFECT THE CORPORATE INVESTMENT DECISIONS? EVIDENCE FROM CATERING EFFECT
    Usman, Muhammad
    Saleem, Sana
    Mahmood, Faiq
    Imran, Humera
    RISUS-JOURNAL ON INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 9 (01): : 43 - 54
  • [24] The corporate governance of Benedictine abbeys What can stock corporations learn from monasteries?
    Rost, Katja
    Inauen, Emil
    Osterloh, Margit
    Frey, Bruno S.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT HISTORY, 2010, 16 (01) : 90 - +
  • [25] Do corporate sustainability initiatives improve corporate carbon performance? Evidence from European firms
    Haque, Faizul
    Ntim, Collins G.
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (07) : 3318 - 3334
  • [26] Do academic executives influence corporate ESG performance? Evidence from China
    Wang, Shanping
    Liang, Xinye
    Huang, Jiawei
    Cao, Peng
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 32 (01) : 788 - 805
  • [27] Sustainable Development and Corporate Environmental Responsibility: Evidence from Chinese Corporations
    He, Mao
    Chen, Juan
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2009, 22 (04): : 323 - 339
  • [28] Sustainable Development and Corporate Environmental Responsibility: Evidence from Chinese Corporations
    Mao He
    Juan Chen
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2009, 22 : 323 - 339
  • [29] Corporate Social Responsibility in the Internationalization of Corporations: Empirical Evidence from China
    Wang Wen
    Zhou Jian
    Liu Xiaoyuan
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING: ENTERPRISE, ENVIRONMENT AND CRISIS, 2009, : 819 - 827
  • [30] Do takeover laws matter? Evidence from five decades of hostile takeovers
    Cain, Matthew D.
    McKeon, Stephen B.
    Solomon, Steven Davidoff
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 124 (03) : 464 - 485