The Analysis of Student Performance During Face-to-Face and Distance Learning Under Z-Information

被引:0
|
作者
Tumor, S., V [1 ]
Poleshchuk, O. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Moscow Bauman State Tech Univ, 5-2nd Baumanskaya, Moscow 105005, Russia
来源
ADVANCES IN AUTOMATION III | 2022年 / 857卷
关键词
Distance learning; Z-number; Z-information; Weighted segment;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-94202-1_37
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper the comparative analysis of student performance during face-to-face and distance learning under Z-information is developed. Importance of similar researches has increased in the context of pandemic, when the quality of education has decreased due to the enforced transition of the majority of universities to online learning. Moreover the reliability of the students' grades has been affected negatively, which cannot be ignored. For this purpose an instrument for the processing of Z-information is essential. Student performance is associated with four Z-numbers, the first component represents the formalization of grades "unsatisfactory", "satisfactory", "good", "excellent". The formalizations of these grades constitute the valuation of a linguistic variable with the completeness and orthogonal properties, which aggregates the linguistic variables by three regulating criteria. The second component of Z-numbers is the fuzzy value of the reliability of formalized grades. Students' performance manifests itself through the total of four Z-numbers for a term of face-to-face learning and for a term of distance learning. To conduct a comparative analysis of the collected data operations with Z-numbers, distances between them and the distance between the populations of Z-numbers are specified. Anumerical example is given demonstrating the function and effectiveness of this model.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 402
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bridging face-to-face and distance communication in a blended learning Master's degree
    Soubrie, Thierry
    ALSIC-APPRENTISSAGE DES LANGUES ET SYSTEMS D INFORMATION ET DE COMMUNICATION, 2008, 11 (02):
  • [32] Comparison of student attitudes and performance in an online and a face-to-face inorganic chemistry course
    Nennig, Hannah T.
    Idarraga, Katrina L.
    Salzer, Luke D.
    Bleske-Rechek, April
    Theisen, Roslyn M.
    CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (01) : 168 - 177
  • [33] WOMEN AND MEN PERFORMANCE IN FACE-TO-FACE, VIRTUAL AND DISTANCE HIGHER EDUCATION IN COLOMBIA
    Arias-Velandia, Nicolas
    Umar Rincon-Baez, William
    Mauricio Cruz-Pulido, Julian
    PANORAMA, 2018, 12 (22)
  • [35] Interpersonal Distance and Face-to-face Behavior During Therapeutic Activities for Children with ASD
    Tsuji, Airi
    Matsuda, Soichiro
    Suzuki, Kenji
    COMPUTERS HELPING PEOPLE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, PT II (ICCHP 2016), 2016, 9759 : 367 - 374
  • [36] Early Prediction of Student Performance in Face-to-Face Education Environments: A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach With XAI Techniques
    Kala, Ahmet
    Torkul, Orhan
    Yildiz, Tugba Tunacan
    Selvi, Ihsan Hakan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 191635 - 191649
  • [37] Student learning performance and satisfaction with traditional face-to-face classroom versus online learning: Evidence from teaching Statistics for Business
    Lin, Tin-Chun
    E-LEARNING AND DIGITAL MEDIA, 2022, 19 (03) : 340 - 360
  • [38] Active Participation and Interaction, Key Performance Factors of Face-to-Face Learning
    Marco-Fondevila, Miguel
    Rueda-Tomas, Mar
    Pilar Latorre-Martinez, Maria
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [39] An Assessment of Student Learning Perceptions in Concurrent Online and Face-to-Face Education Delivery Environments
    Raghavan, Vijay V.
    Braun, Frank
    Goh, Samuel
    AMCIS 2014 PROCEEDINGS, 2014,
  • [40] From face-to-face to distance LMS-mediated collaborative learning situations with GLUE!
    Alario-Hoyos, Carlos
    Gomez-Sanchez, Eduardo
    Bote-Lorenzo, Miguel L.
    Asensio-Perez, Juan I.
    Vega-Gorgojo, Guillermo
    Ruiz-Calleja, Adolfo
    COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2015, 23 (04) : 527 - 536