Early Prediction of Student Performance in Face-to-Face Education Environments: A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach With XAI Techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Kala, Ahmet [1 ,2 ]
Torkul, Orhan [1 ]
Yildiz, Tugba Tunacan [3 ]
Selvi, Ihsan Hakan [4 ]
机构
[1] Sakarya Univ, Ind Engn Dept, TR-54050 Sakarya, Turkiye
[2] Sakarya Univ Appl Sci, Dept Informat Technol, TR-54050 Sakarya, Turkiye
[3] Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Ind Engn Dept, TR-14030 Bolu, Turkiye
[4] Sakarya Univ, Dept Informat Syst Engn, TR-54050 Sakarya, Turkiye
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2024年 / 12卷
关键词
Predictive models; Education; Deep learning; Explainable AI; Data models; Long short term memory; Feature extraction; Electronic learning; Data mining; Context modeling; Early prediction of student performance; deep learning (DL); explainable artificial intelligence; local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME); and shapley additive explanations (SHAP); PARTICLE SWARM;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3516816
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A community is only as strong as its weakest link; this principle also applies to student communities in the educational field. The quality of learning achieved by students in a course is directly related to the performance of the weakest student in that course. Therefore, a high number of students failing a course and the necessity of repeating it are undesirable in terms of learning quality. This study aims to predict students' performance early during their coursework to identify those at risk of failing, thus improving the quality of the course and determining the necessary resources to achieve this goal. To this end, we proposed a conceptual model based on a hybrid method combining Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Deep Neural Networks (DNN). To evaluate the classification performance of the model, comparisons were made with classical machine learning and deep learning models. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) methods were used to determine the contribution of different features to the model's predictions. Additionally, to assess the generalizability and applicability of the model, the widely used xAPI-Edu-Data dataset, which covers various courses, was employed, and the accuracy results of the model were compared with early prediction studies published in the literature. As a result, it was found that our prediction model performed 6% better than the classical models and achieved better results than most of the models, except for two models in the literature with similar results. Moreover, important performance features that can be used to evaluate students earlier in the course were identified.
引用
收藏
页码:191635 / 191649
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Assessment of Student Learning Perceptions in Concurrent Online and Face-to-Face Education Delivery Environments
    Raghavan, Vijay V.
    Braun, Frank
    Goh, Samuel
    AMCIS 2014 PROCEEDINGS, 2014,
  • [2] Student Responses to Virtual Synchronous, Hybrid, and Face-to-Face Teaching/Learning
    Flynn-Wilson, Linda
    Reynolds, Kate E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2021, 4 (01): : 46 - 56
  • [3] Using an adaptive learning tool to improve student performance and satisfaction in online and face-to-face education for a more personalized approach
    Monica F. Contrino
    Maribell Reyes-Millán
    Patricia Vázquez-Villegas
    Jorge Membrillo-Hernández
    Smart Learning Environments, 11
  • [4] Using an adaptive learning tool to improve student performance and satisfaction in online and face-to-face education for a more personalized approach
    Contrino, Monica F.
    Reyes-Millan, Maribell
    Vazquez-Villegas, Patricia
    Membrillo-Hernandez, Jorge
    SMART LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [5] Disrupted student engagement and motivation: observations from online and face-to-face university learning environments
    Hari Rajan, Manisha
    Herbert, Cristan
    Polly, Patsie
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2024, 8
  • [6] Face-to-face, blended, flipped, or online learning environment? Impact on learning performance and student cognitions
    Thai, Ngoc Thuy Thi
    De Wever, Bram
    Valcke, Martin
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2020, 36 (03) : 397 - 411
  • [7] A course is a course is a course: Factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments
    Dziuban, Charles
    Moskal, Patsy
    INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 14 (04): : 236 - 241
  • [8] The effect of face-to-face versus online learning on student performance in anatomy: an observational study using a causal inference approach
    Joanna Diong
    Hopin Lee
    Darren Reed
    Discover Education, 2 (1):
  • [9] DISTANCE LEARNING AND FACE-TO-FACE LEARNING: STUDENT PERCEPTION OF QUALITY ASSURANCE AND PROSPECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT IN EDUCATION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES
    Moroz, Dr Volodymyr
    Moroz, Svitlana
    TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2022, 23 (04): : 159 - 182
  • [10] The Analysis of Student Performance During Face-to-Face and Distance Learning Under Z-Information
    Tumor, S., V
    Poleshchuk, O. M.
    ADVANCES IN AUTOMATION III, 2022, 857 : 393 - 402