Budgeted influence and earned benefit maximization with tags in social networks

被引:2
|
作者
Banerjee, Suman [1 ]
Pal, Bithika [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Jammu, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Kharagpur, W Bengal, India
关键词
Social network; Influence probability; Seed set; MIA model; PROFIT MAXIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s13278-021-00850-z
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Influence Maximization Problem aims at identifying a limited number of highly influential users who will be working for diffusion agents to maximize the influence. In case of Budgeted Influence Maximization (BIM), the users of the network have a cost and influential user selection needs to be done within a given budget. In case of Earned Benefit Maximization (EBM) Problem, a set of target users along with their benefit value is given and the aim is to choose highly influential users within an allocated budget to maximize the earned benefit. In this paper, we study the BIM and EBM Problem under the tag-specific edge probability setting, which means instead of a single edge probability a set of probability values (each one for a specific context e.g., 'games,' academics; etc.) per edge is given. The aim is to identify the influential tags and users for maximizing the influence and earned benefit. Considering the realistic fact that different tags have a different impact on different communities of a social network, we propose two solution methodologies and one pruning technique. A detailed analysis of all the solution approaches has been done. An extensive set of experiments have been carried out with three benchmark datasets. From the experiments, we observe that the proposed solution approaches outperform baseline methods (e.g., random node-random tag, high-degree node-high-frequency tag, high-degree node-high-frequency tag with community). For the tag-based BIM Problem the improvement is upto 8% in terms of number of influenced nodes and for the tag-based EBM Problem the improvement is upto 15% in terms of earned benefit.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence maximization in social networks based on TOPSIS
    Zareie, Ahmad
    Sheikhahmadi, Amir
    Khamforoosh, Keyhan
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 108 : 96 - 107
  • [32] Influence maximization of informed agents in social networks
    AskariSichani, Omid
    Jalili, Mahdi
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2015, 254 : 229 - 239
  • [33] Influence Maximization in Social Networks with Genetic Algorithms
    Bucur, Doina
    Iacca, Giovanni
    APPLICATIONS OF EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, EVOAPPLICATIONS 2016, PT I, 2016, 9597 : 379 - 392
  • [34] Relative influence maximization in competitive social networks
    Dingda Yang
    Xiangwen Liao
    Huawei Shen
    Xueqi Cheng
    Guolong Chen
    Science China Information Sciences, 2017, 60
  • [35] Maximization influence in dynamic social networks and graphs
    Smani, Gkolfo I.
    Megalooikonomou, Vasileios
    ARRAY, 2022, 15
  • [36] Exploring Online Social Networks for Influence Maximization
    Yellakuor, Baagyere Edward
    Qin Zhen
    Xiong Hu
    Qin Zhiguang
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOP ON COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION (IEMCON), 2015,
  • [37] Influence Maximization with Trust Relationship in Social Networks
    Wang, Nan
    Li, Jinbao
    Da, Jiansong
    Liu, Yong
    2018 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE AD-HOC AND SENSOR NETWORKS (MSN 2018), 2018, : 61 - 67
  • [38] Estimate on Expectation for Influence Maximization in Social Networks
    Zhang, Yao
    Gu, Qing
    Zheng, Jun
    Chen, Daoxu
    ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, PT I, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 6118 : 99 - 106
  • [39] Supplementary Influence Maximization Problem in Social Networks
    Zhang, Yapu
    Guo, Jianxiong
    Yang, Wenguo
    Wu, Weili
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 11 (01) : 986 - 996
  • [40] Influence Maximization with Novelty Decay in Social Networks
    Feng, Shanshan
    Chen, Xuefeng
    Cong, Gao
    Zeng, Yifeng
    Chee, Yeow Meng
    Xiang, Yanping
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2014, : 37 - 43