Life-cycle assessment of biogas production under the environmental conditions of northern Germany: greenhouse gas balance

被引:19
|
作者
Claus, S. [1 ]
Taube, F. [1 ]
Wienforth, B. [1 ]
Svoboda, N. [2 ]
Sieling, K. [1 ]
Kage, H. [1 ]
Senbayram, M. [3 ]
Dittert, K. [3 ]
Gericke, D. [1 ]
Pacholski, A. [1 ]
Herrmann, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, Inst Crop Sci & Plant Breeding, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[2] Leibnitz Ctr Agr Landscape Res, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[3] Univ Gottingen, Inst Appl Plant Nutr, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
来源
关键词
CROP PRODUCTION; SYSTEMS; ENERGY; MAIZE;
D O I
10.1017/S0021859613000683
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
A considerable expansion of biogas production in Germany, paralleled by a strong increase in maize acreage, has caused growing concern that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during crop substrate production might counteract the GHG emission saving potential. Based on a 2-year field trial, a GHG balance was conducted to evaluate the mitigation potential of regionally adapted cropping systems (continuous maize, maize-wheat-Italian ryegrass, perennial ryegrass ley), depending on nitrogen (N) level and N type. Considering the whole production chain, all cropping systems investigated contributed to the mitigation of GHG emissions (6.7-13.3 t CO2 eq/ha), with continuous maize revealing a carbon dioxide (CO2) saving potential of 55-61% compared with a fossil energy mix reference system. The current sustainability thresholds in terms of CO2 savings set by the EU Renewable Energy Directive could be met by all cropping systems (48-76%). Emissions from crop production had the largest impact on the mitigation effect (>= 50%) unless the biogas residue storage was not covered. The comparison of N fertilizer types showed less pronounced differences in GHG mitigation potential, whereas considerable site effects were observed.
引用
收藏
页码:S172 / S181
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Uncertainty and variability in environmental life-cycle assessment
    Mark Huijbregts
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002, 7 : 173 - 173
  • [42] Uncertainty and variability in environmental life-cycle assessment
    Huijbregts, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2002, 7 (03): : 173 - 173
  • [43] LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS AND ECOLOGICAL BALANCE - METHODICAL APPROACHES TO ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF PRODUCTS
    KLOPFFER, W
    RIPPEN, G
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 18 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [44] The Life-cycle Assessment and Environmental Impacts of Electricity Production in Porto Santo Island
    Torabi, Roham
    Rizzoli, Nicolo
    Arosio, Valeria
    Morgado-Dias, F.
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY IN SMALL DEVELOPING ECONOMIES (ES2DE), 2017,
  • [45] Use of the life-cycle assessment (LCA) toolbox for an environmental evaluation of production processes
    Herrchen, M
    Klein, W
    PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 2000, 72 (07) : 1247 - 1252
  • [46] Stochastic comparative assessment of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from conventional and electric vehicles
    Noshadravan, Arash
    Cheah, Lynette
    Roth, Richard
    Freire, Fausto
    Dias, Luis
    Gregory, Jeremy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (06): : 854 - 864
  • [47] Stochastic comparative assessment of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from conventional and electric vehicles
    Arash Noshadravan
    Lynette Cheah
    Richard Roth
    Fausto Freire
    Luis Dias
    Jeremy Gregory
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20 : 854 - 864
  • [48] Facility-level energy and greenhouse gas life-cycle assessment of the global nickel industry
    Eckelman, Matthew J.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2010, 54 (04) : 256 - 266
  • [49] Energy intensity, life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions, and economic assessment of liquid biofuel pipelines
    Strogen, Bret
    Horvath, Arpad
    Zilberman, David
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 150 : 476 - 485
  • [50] Life-cycle greenhouse gas assessment of Community Supported Agriculture in California's Central Valley
    Christensen, Libby O.
    Galt, Ryan E.
    Kendall, Alissa
    RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (05) : 393 - 405