Life-cycle assessment of biogas production under the environmental conditions of northern Germany: greenhouse gas balance

被引:19
|
作者
Claus, S. [1 ]
Taube, F. [1 ]
Wienforth, B. [1 ]
Svoboda, N. [2 ]
Sieling, K. [1 ]
Kage, H. [1 ]
Senbayram, M. [3 ]
Dittert, K. [3 ]
Gericke, D. [1 ]
Pacholski, A. [1 ]
Herrmann, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, Inst Crop Sci & Plant Breeding, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[2] Leibnitz Ctr Agr Landscape Res, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[3] Univ Gottingen, Inst Appl Plant Nutr, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
来源
关键词
CROP PRODUCTION; SYSTEMS; ENERGY; MAIZE;
D O I
10.1017/S0021859613000683
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
A considerable expansion of biogas production in Germany, paralleled by a strong increase in maize acreage, has caused growing concern that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during crop substrate production might counteract the GHG emission saving potential. Based on a 2-year field trial, a GHG balance was conducted to evaluate the mitigation potential of regionally adapted cropping systems (continuous maize, maize-wheat-Italian ryegrass, perennial ryegrass ley), depending on nitrogen (N) level and N type. Considering the whole production chain, all cropping systems investigated contributed to the mitigation of GHG emissions (6.7-13.3 t CO2 eq/ha), with continuous maize revealing a carbon dioxide (CO2) saving potential of 55-61% compared with a fossil energy mix reference system. The current sustainability thresholds in terms of CO2 savings set by the EU Renewable Energy Directive could be met by all cropping systems (48-76%). Emissions from crop production had the largest impact on the mitigation effect (>= 50%) unless the biogas residue storage was not covered. The comparison of N fertilizer types showed less pronounced differences in GHG mitigation potential, whereas considerable site effects were observed.
引用
收藏
页码:S172 / S181
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Greenhouse Gas Emissions of a Hydrogen Engine for Automotive Application through Life-Cycle Assessment
    Accardo, Antonella
    Costantino, Trentalessandro
    Malagrino, Gianfranco
    Pensato, Michele
    Spessa, Ezio
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (11)
  • [32] Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems
    Adler, Paul R.
    Del Grosso, Stephen J.
    Parton, William J.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2007, 17 (03) : 675 - 691
  • [33] Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emission Benefits of Natural Gas Vehicles
    He, Xiaoyi
    Wallington, Timothy J.
    Anderson, James E.
    Keoleian, Gregory A.
    Shen, Wei
    De Kleine, Robert
    Kim, Hyung Chul
    Winkler, Sandy
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (23) : 7813 - 7823
  • [34] Environmental impacts and resource use from Australian pork production assessed using life-cycle assessment. 1. Greenhouse gas emissions
    Wiedemann, S. G.
    McGahan, Eugene J.
    Murphy, Caoilinn M.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (09) : 1418 - 1431
  • [35] Cost and Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Implications of Integrating Biogas Upgrading and Carbon Capture Technologies in Cellulosic Biorefineries
    Yang, Minliang
    Baral, Nawa Raj
    Anastasopoulou, Aikaterini
    Breunig, Hanna M.
    Scown, Corinne D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (20) : 12810 - 12819
  • [36] Greenhouse gas emission of household plastic biogas digester using life cycle assessment approach
    Haryanto, A.
    Cahyani, D.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 258
  • [37] Modeling Future Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Environmental Impacts of Electricity Supplies in Brazil
    Dale, Alexander T.
    Pereira de Lucena, Andre Frossard
    Marriott, Joe
    Moreira Cesar Borba, Bruno Soares
    Schaeffer, Roberto
    Bilec, Melissa M.
    ENERGIES, 2013, 6 (07) : 3182 - 3208
  • [38] Balance between energy conservation and environmental impact: Life-cycle energy analysis and life-cycle environmental impact analysis
    Hu, Ming
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 140 : 131 - 139
  • [39] The Greenhouse Gas Balance of a Dairy Farm as Influenced by the Uptake of Biogas Production
    Dieterich, Burkart
    Finnan, John
    Hochstrasser, Tamara
    Mueller, Christoph
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (01) : 95 - 109
  • [40] The Greenhouse Gas Balance of a Dairy Farm as Influenced by the Uptake of Biogas Production
    Burkart Dieterich
    John Finnan
    Tamara Hochstrasser
    Christoph Müller
    BioEnergy Research, 2014, 7 : 95 - 109