Comparison of Performance of Psychiatrists vs Other Outpatient Physicians in the 2020 US Medicare Merit-Based Incentive Payment System

被引:2
|
作者
Qi, Andrew C. [1 ,2 ]
Maddox, Karen E. Joynt [1 ]
Bierut, Laura J. [3 ]
Johnston, Kenton J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] St Louis Univ, Coll Publ Hlth & Social Justice, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, St Louis, MO 63104 USA
来源
JAMA HEALTH FORUM | 2022年 / 3卷 / 03期
关键词
1ST YEAR; CARE; PARTICIPATION; CLINICIAN; INSURANCE; RATES;
D O I
10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0212
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Question How did psychiatrists perform in the 2020 Medicare Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) compared with other outpatient physicians? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 9356 psychiatrists and 196 306 other outpatient physicians participating in the 2020 MIPS, psychiatrists had significantly lower performance scores, were significantly more likely to be assessed a performance penalty, and were less likely to be assessed a bonus than other physicians. Meaning Psychiatrists performed worse than other physicians in Medicare's new mandatory outpatient value-based payment system; therefore, more research is needed to evaluate the appropriateness of MIPS measures for psychiatrists. Importance Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) is a new, mandatory, outpatient value-based payment program that ties reimbursement to performance on cost and quality measures for many US clinicians. However, it is currently unknown how the program measures the performance of psychiatrists, who often treat a different patient case mix with different clinical considerations than do other outpatient clinicians. Objective To compare performance scores and value-based reimbursement for psychiatrists vs other outpatient physicians in the 2020 MIPS. Design, Setting, and Participants In this cross-sectional study, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Provider Data Catalog was used to identify outpatient Medicare physicians listed in the National Downloadable File between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, who participated in the 2020 MIPS and received a publicly reported final performance score. Data from the 593 863 clinicians participating in the 2020 MIPS were used to compare differences in the 2020 MIPS performance scores and value-based reimbursement (based on performance in 2018) for psychiatrists vs other physicians, adjusting for physician, patient, and practice area characteristics. Exposures Participation in MIPS. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were final MIPS performance score and negative (penalty), positive, and exceptional performance bonus payment adjustments. Secondary outcomes were scores in the MIPS performance domains: quality, promoting interoperability, improvement activities, and cost. Results This study included 9356 psychiatrists (3407 [36.4%] female and 5 949 [63.6%] male) and 196 306 other outpatient physicians (69 221 [35.3%] female and 127 085 [64.7%] male) (data on age and race are not available). Compared with other physicians, psychiatrists were less likely to be affiliated with a safety-net hospital (2119 [22.6%] vs 64 997 [33.1%]) or a major teaching hospital (2148 [23.0%] vs 53 321 [27.2%]) and had lower annual Medicare patient volume (181 vs 437 patients) and mean patient risk scores (1.65 vs 1.78) (P < .001 for all). The mean final MIPS performance score for psychiatrists was 84.0 vs 89.7 for other physicians (absolute difference, -5.7; 95% CI, -6.2 to -5.2). A total of 573 psychiatrists (6.1%) received a penalty vs 5739 (2.9%) of other physicians (absolute difference, 3.2%; 95% CI, 2.8%-3.6%); 8664 psychiatrists (92.6%) vs 189 037 other physicians (96.3%) received a positive payment adjustment (absolute difference, -3.7%; 95% CI, -3.3% to -4.1%), and 7672 psychiatrists (82.0%) vs 174 040 other physicians (88.7%) received a bonus payment adjustment (absolute difference, -6.7%; 95% CI, -6.0% to -7.3%). These differences remained significant after adjustment. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study that compared US psychiatrists with other outpatient physicians, psychiatrists had significantly lower 2020 MIPS performance scores, were penalized more frequently, and received fewer bonuses. Policy makers should evaluate whether current MIPS performance measures appropriately assess the performance of psychiatrists. This cross-sectional study compares the performance of psychiatrists vs other outpatient physicians in Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Physician Practice Leaders’ Perceptions of Medicare’s Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)
    Dhruv Khullar
    Amelia M. Bond
    Yuting Qian
    Eloise O’Donnell
    David N. Gans
    Lawrence P. Casalino
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2021, 36 : 3752 - 3758
  • [32] Physician Practice Leaders' Perceptions of Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)
    Khullar, Dhruv
    Bond, Amelia M.
    Qian, Yuting
    O'Donnell, Eloise
    Gans, David N.
    Casalino, Lawrence P.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (12) : 3752 - 3758
  • [33] Ophthalmologists in the First Year of the Merit-based Incentive Payment System
    Feng, Paula W.
    Gronbeck, Christian
    Chen, Evan M.
    Teng, Christopher C.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 128 (01) : 162 - 164
  • [34] Implications of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System for Urology Practices
    Maganty, Avinash
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Kaufman, Samuel R.
    Oerline, Mary K.
    Lai, Lillian Y.
    Caram, Megan E. V.
    Shahinian, Vahakn B.
    UROLOGY, 2022, 169 : 84 - 90
  • [35] Merit-Based Incentive Payment System: Referencing Source Documents
    Hess, Cathy Thomas
    ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2017, 30 (11) : 528 - 528
  • [36] The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): A Primer for Otolaryngologists
    Rathi, Vinay K.
    Naunheim, Matthew R.
    Varvares, Mark A.
    Holmes, Kenneth
    Gagliano, Nancy
    Hartnick, Christopher J.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2018, 159 (03) : 410 - 413
  • [37] Implications of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System for Urology Practices
    Maganty, Avinash
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Kaufman, Samuel R.
    Oerline, Mary K.
    Lai, Lillian Y.
    Caram, Megan E., V
    Shahinian, Vahakn B.
    UROLOGY, 2022, 169 : 84 - 90
  • [38] Performance of Neurosurgeons Providing Safety-Net Care Under Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System
    Ng, Grace Y.
    DiGiorgio, Anthony M.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 94 (06) : 1301 - 1310
  • [39] Economic Impact of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System for Ophthalmologists
    Berkowitz, Sean
    Siktberg, Jonathan
    Gupta, Arulita
    Portney, David
    Chen, Evan
    Parikh, Ravi
    Finn, Avni
    Patel, Shriji
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [40] Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Scores in Ophthalmology and Optometry
    Sheth, Neil
    French, Dustin D.
    Tanna, Angelo P.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 128 (05) : 793 - 795