Comparison of Performance of Psychiatrists vs Other Outpatient Physicians in the 2020 US Medicare Merit-Based Incentive Payment System

被引:2
|
作者
Qi, Andrew C. [1 ,2 ]
Maddox, Karen E. Joynt [1 ]
Bierut, Laura J. [3 ]
Johnston, Kenton J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] St Louis Univ, Coll Publ Hlth & Social Justice, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, St Louis, MO 63104 USA
来源
JAMA HEALTH FORUM | 2022年 / 3卷 / 03期
关键词
1ST YEAR; CARE; PARTICIPATION; CLINICIAN; INSURANCE; RATES;
D O I
10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0212
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Question How did psychiatrists perform in the 2020 Medicare Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) compared with other outpatient physicians? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 9356 psychiatrists and 196 306 other outpatient physicians participating in the 2020 MIPS, psychiatrists had significantly lower performance scores, were significantly more likely to be assessed a performance penalty, and were less likely to be assessed a bonus than other physicians. Meaning Psychiatrists performed worse than other physicians in Medicare's new mandatory outpatient value-based payment system; therefore, more research is needed to evaluate the appropriateness of MIPS measures for psychiatrists. Importance Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) is a new, mandatory, outpatient value-based payment program that ties reimbursement to performance on cost and quality measures for many US clinicians. However, it is currently unknown how the program measures the performance of psychiatrists, who often treat a different patient case mix with different clinical considerations than do other outpatient clinicians. Objective To compare performance scores and value-based reimbursement for psychiatrists vs other outpatient physicians in the 2020 MIPS. Design, Setting, and Participants In this cross-sectional study, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Provider Data Catalog was used to identify outpatient Medicare physicians listed in the National Downloadable File between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, who participated in the 2020 MIPS and received a publicly reported final performance score. Data from the 593 863 clinicians participating in the 2020 MIPS were used to compare differences in the 2020 MIPS performance scores and value-based reimbursement (based on performance in 2018) for psychiatrists vs other physicians, adjusting for physician, patient, and practice area characteristics. Exposures Participation in MIPS. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were final MIPS performance score and negative (penalty), positive, and exceptional performance bonus payment adjustments. Secondary outcomes were scores in the MIPS performance domains: quality, promoting interoperability, improvement activities, and cost. Results This study included 9356 psychiatrists (3407 [36.4%] female and 5 949 [63.6%] male) and 196 306 other outpatient physicians (69 221 [35.3%] female and 127 085 [64.7%] male) (data on age and race are not available). Compared with other physicians, psychiatrists were less likely to be affiliated with a safety-net hospital (2119 [22.6%] vs 64 997 [33.1%]) or a major teaching hospital (2148 [23.0%] vs 53 321 [27.2%]) and had lower annual Medicare patient volume (181 vs 437 patients) and mean patient risk scores (1.65 vs 1.78) (P < .001 for all). The mean final MIPS performance score for psychiatrists was 84.0 vs 89.7 for other physicians (absolute difference, -5.7; 95% CI, -6.2 to -5.2). A total of 573 psychiatrists (6.1%) received a penalty vs 5739 (2.9%) of other physicians (absolute difference, 3.2%; 95% CI, 2.8%-3.6%); 8664 psychiatrists (92.6%) vs 189 037 other physicians (96.3%) received a positive payment adjustment (absolute difference, -3.7%; 95% CI, -3.3% to -4.1%), and 7672 psychiatrists (82.0%) vs 174 040 other physicians (88.7%) received a bonus payment adjustment (absolute difference, -6.7%; 95% CI, -6.0% to -7.3%). These differences remained significant after adjustment. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study that compared US psychiatrists with other outpatient physicians, psychiatrists had significantly lower 2020 MIPS performance scores, were penalized more frequently, and received fewer bonuses. Policy makers should evaluate whether current MIPS performance measures appropriately assess the performance of psychiatrists. This cross-sectional study compares the performance of psychiatrists vs other outpatient physicians in Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Group Practice Performance in the Second Year of Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System
    Liao, Joshua M.
    Zhou, Lingmei
    Navathe, Amol S.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (10)
  • [12] Rewarding Cost Efficiency in Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System
    Glasser, David
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 126 (02) : 189 - 191
  • [13] Gastroenterologists Performance and Payments in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System
    Ying, Xiaohan
    Palmer, Nicole
    Camelo, Felipe
    Smith, Emily
    Tummalapalli, Sri
    Fogla, Rhea
    Jesudian, Arun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S1311 - S1311
  • [14] Otolaryngologist Performance in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System in 2017
    Xiao, Roy
    Rathi, Vinay K.
    Kondamuri, Neil
    Gadkaree, Shekhar K.
    Suresh, Krish
    McCarty, Justin C.
    Bergmark, Regan W.
    Naunheim, Matthew R.
    Varvares, Mark A.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2020, 146 (07) : 639 - 646
  • [15] Oncologist Participation and Performance in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System
    Patel, Vishal R.
    Cwalina, Thomas B.
    Gupta, Arjun
    Nortje, Nico
    Mullangi, Samyukta
    Parikh, Ravi B.
    Shih, Ya-Chen Tina
    Hussaini, S. M. Qasim
    ONCOLOGIST, 2023, : E228 - E232
  • [16] Otolaryngologist Performance in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System in 2018
    Miller, Lauren E.
    Kondamuri, Neil S.
    Xiao, Roy
    Rathi, Vinay K.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2022, 166 (05) : 858 - 861
  • [17] Performance and Quality Measure Selection by Mohs Surgeons in the 2020 Merit-Based Incentive Payment System
    Gronbeck, Christian
    Feng, Hao
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2023, 49 (10) : 932 - 937
  • [18] Emergency clinician participation and performance in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System
    Gettel, Cameron J.
    Han, Christopher R.
    Granovsky, Michael A.
    Berdahl, Carl T.
    Kocher, Keith E.
    Mehrotra, Abhishek
    Schuur, Jeremiah D.
    Aldeen, Amer Z.
    Griffey, Richard T.
    Venkatesh, Arjun K.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 29 (01) : 64 - 72
  • [19] Association of Clinician Minority Patient Caseload With Performance in the 2019 Medicare Merit-based Incentive Payment System
    Johnston, Kenton J.
    Meyers, David J.
    Hammond, Gmerice
    Maddox, Karen E. Joynt
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 325 (12): : 1221 - 1223
  • [20] Incomplete Picture of Otolaryngologist Performance in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System
    Lum, Flora Chu
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2020, 146 (11) : 1086 - 1087