Concentration-Temporal Multilevel Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors

被引:2
|
作者
Day, Rong-Fuh [1 ]
Yin, Peng-Yeng [2 ]
Huang, Yuh-Chin T. [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Cheng-Yi [5 ,6 ]
Tsai, Chih-Chun [1 ]
Yu, Cheng-Hsien [7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chi Nan Univ, Dept Informat Management, 1 Univ Rd, Puli 545, Nantou County, Taiwan
[2] Ming Chuan Univ, Informat Technol & Management Program, 5 De Ming Rd, Taoyuan 333, Gui Shan Distri, Taiwan
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Med Ctr, 10 Duke Med Circle, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Sch Med, 10 Duke Med Circle, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[5] Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Cardinal Tien Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, New Taipei 231, Taishan Distric, Taiwan
[6] Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, New Taipei 231, Taishan Distric, Taiwan
[7] China Univ Technol, Dept Informat Management, 56,Sec 3,Xinglong Rd, Taipei 116, Wunshan Distric, Taiwan
关键词
PM2.5; supersite sensor; low-cost sensor; multilevel calibration; linear regression; AMBIENT;
D O I
10.3390/su141610015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ambient aerosols have a significant impact on plant species mortality, air pollution, and climate change. It is critical to monitor the concentrations of aerosols, especially particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter <= 2.5 mu m (PM2.5), which has a direct relationship with human respiratory diseases. Recently, low-cost PM2.5 sensors have been deployed to provide a denser monitoring coverage than that of government-built monitoring supersites, which only give a macro perspective of air quality. To increase the measurement accuracy, low-cost sensors need to be calibrated. In current practice, regression techniques are used to calibrate sensors. This paper proposes a concentration-temporal multilevel calibration method to cope with the varying regression relation in different concentration and temporal domains. The performance of our method is evaluated with real field data from a supersite sensor and a low-cost sensor deployed in Puli, Taiwan. The experimental results show that our calibration method significantly outperforms linear regression in terms of R-2, Root Mean Square Error, and Normalized Mean Error. Moreover, our method compares favorably with a machine learning calibration method based on gradient regression tree boosting.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM2.5 and PM10 Sensors
    Cavaliere, Alice
    Carotenuto, Federico
    Di Gennaro, Filippo
    Gioli, Beniamino
    Gualtieri, Giovanni
    Martelli, Francesca
    Matese, Alessandro
    Toscano, Piero
    Vagnoli, Carolina
    Zaldei, Alessandro
    SENSORS, 2018, 18 (09)
  • [32] Citizen-operated mobile low-cost sensors for urban PM2.5 monitoring: field calibration, uncertainty estimation, and application
    Hassani, Amirhossein
    Castell, Nuria
    Watne, Agot K.
    Schneider, Philipp
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 95
  • [33] Evaluation of nine machine learning regression algorithms for calibration of low-cost PM2.5 sensor
    Kumar, Vikas
    Sahu, Manoranjan
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2021, 157
  • [34] Calibration of low-cost PurpleAir outdoor monitors using an improved method of calculating PM2.5
    Wallace, Lance
    Bi, Jianzhao
    Ott, Wayne R.
    Sarnat, Jeremy
    Liu, Yang
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 256
  • [35] Performance evaluation of twelve low-cost PM2.5 sensors at an ambient air monitoring site
    Feenstra, Brandon
    Papapostolou, Vasileios
    Hasheminassab, Sina
    Zhang, Hang
    Boghossian, Berj Der
    Cocker, David
    Polidori, Andrea
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 216
  • [36] Response of low-cost sensors to high PM2.5 concentrations during bushfire and haze events
    Liu, Xiaoting
    Pushpawela, Buddhi
    Jayaratne, Rohan
    Thai, Phong
    Christensen, Bryce
    Zing, Isak
    Lamont, Riki
    Dunbabin, Matthew
    Wang, Hao
    Gao, Jian
    Morawska, Lidia
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 58 (09) : 978 - 990
  • [37] Assessment of PM2.5 Exposure during Cycle Trips in The Netherlands Using Low-Cost Sensors
    Wesseling, Joost
    Hendricx, Wouter
    de Ruiter, Henri
    van Ratingen, Sjoerd
    Drukker, Derko
    Huitema, Maaike
    Schouwenaar, Claar
    Janssen, Geert
    van Aken, Stephen
    Smeenk, Jan Willem
    Hof, Arjen
    Tielemans, Erik
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (11)
  • [38] Vertical distribution analysis of PM2.5 concentration at urban highway intersections using low-cost sensors and unmanned aerial vehicles
    Zarei, Masoud
    Yeganeh, Bijan
    URBAN CLIMATE, 2025, 59
  • [39] Long-term evaluation and calibration of three types of low-cost PM2.5 sensors at different air quality monitoring stations
    Hong, Gung-Hwa
    Le, Thi-Cuc
    Tu, Jing-Wei
    Wang, Chieh
    Chang, Shuenn-Chin
    Yu, Jhih-Yuan
    Lin, Guan-Yu
    Aggarwal, Shankar G.
    Tsai, Chuen-Jinn
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2021, 157
  • [40] Determining PM2.5 calibration curves for a low-cost particle monitor: common indoor residential aerosols
    Dacunto, Philip J.
    Klepeis, Neil E.
    Cheng, Kai-Chung
    Acevedo-Bolton, Viviana
    Jiang, Ruo-Ting
    Repace, James L.
    Ott, Wayne R.
    Hildemann, Lynn M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2015, 17 (11) : 1959 - 1966