Quantum Fair Machine Learning

被引:3
|
作者
Perrier, Elija [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol, Ctr Quantum Software & Informat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Humanising Machine Intelligence, Acton, ACT, Australia
关键词
quantum computing; fair machine learning;
D O I
10.1145/3461702.3462611
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, we inaugurate the field of quantum fair machine learning. We undertake a comparative analysis of differences and similarities between classical and quantum fair machine learning algorithms, specifying how the unique features of quantum computation alter measures, metrics and remediation strategies when quantum algorithms are subject to fairness constraints. We present the first results in quantum fair machine learning by demonstrating the use of Grover's search algorithm to satisfy statistical parity constraints imposed on quantum algorithms. We provide lower-bounds on iterations needed to achieve such statistical parity within c-tolerance. We extend canonical Lipschitz-conditioned individual fairness criteria to the quantum setting using quantum metrics. We examine the consequences for typical measures of fairness in machine learning context when quantum information processing and quantum data are involved. Finally, we propose open questions and research programmes for this new field of interest to researchers in computer science, ethics and quantum computation.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 853
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Model Projection: Theory and Applications to Fair Machine Learning
    Alghamdi, Wael
    Asoodeh, Shahab
    Wang, Hao
    Calmon, Flavio P.
    Wei, Dennis
    Ramamurthy, Karthikeyan Natesan
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY (ISIT), 2020, : 2711 - 2716
  • [32] An Explainable Feature Selection Approach for Fair Machine Learning
    Yang, Zhi
    Wang, Ziming
    Huang, Changwu
    Yao, Xin
    ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND MACHINE LEARNING, ICANN 2023, PT VIII, 2023, 14261 : 75 - 86
  • [33] Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learning
    Ding, Frances
    Hardt, Moritz
    Miller, John
    Schmidt, Ludwig
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 34 (NEURIPS 2021), 2021, 34
  • [34] What's (Not) Ideal about Fair Machine Learning?
    Sahlgren, Otto
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY, AIES 2022, 2022, : 911 - 911
  • [35] Strategic Best Response Fairness in Fair Machine Learning
    Shimao, Hajime
    Khern-am-nuai, Warut
    Kannan, Karthik
    Cohen, Maxime C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY, AIES 2022, 2022, : 664 - 664
  • [36] Fair Data Representation for Machine Learning at the Pareto Frontier
    Xu, Shizhou
    Strohmer, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2023, 24
  • [37] Towards fair machine learning using combinatorial methods
    Anant Saraswat
    Manjish Pal
    Subham Pokhriyal
    Kumar Abhishek
    Evolutionary Intelligence, 2023, 16 : 903 - 916
  • [38] Long-Term Impacts of Fair Machine Learning
    Zhang, Xueru
    Khalili, Mohammad Mahdi
    Liu, Mingyan
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2020, 28 (03) : 7 - 11
  • [39] Non-empirical problems in fair machine learning
    Teresa Scantamburlo
    Ethics and Information Technology, 2021, 23 : 703 - 712
  • [40] Breaking Taboos in Fair Machine Learning: An Experimental Study
    Nyarko, Julian
    Goel, Sharad
    Sommers, Roseanna
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 ACM CONFERENCE ON EQUITY AND ACCESS IN ALGORITHMS, MECHANISMS, AND OPTIMIZATION, EAAMO 2021, 2021,