Quantum Fair Machine Learning

被引:3
|
作者
Perrier, Elija [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol, Ctr Quantum Software & Informat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Humanising Machine Intelligence, Acton, ACT, Australia
关键词
quantum computing; fair machine learning;
D O I
10.1145/3461702.3462611
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, we inaugurate the field of quantum fair machine learning. We undertake a comparative analysis of differences and similarities between classical and quantum fair machine learning algorithms, specifying how the unique features of quantum computation alter measures, metrics and remediation strategies when quantum algorithms are subject to fairness constraints. We present the first results in quantum fair machine learning by demonstrating the use of Grover's search algorithm to satisfy statistical parity constraints imposed on quantum algorithms. We provide lower-bounds on iterations needed to achieve such statistical parity within c-tolerance. We extend canonical Lipschitz-conditioned individual fairness criteria to the quantum setting using quantum metrics. We examine the consequences for typical measures of fairness in machine learning context when quantum information processing and quantum data are involved. Finally, we propose open questions and research programmes for this new field of interest to researchers in computer science, ethics and quantum computation.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 853
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A fair evaluation of the potential of machine learning in maritime
    Luo, Xi
    Yan, Ran
    Wang, Shuaian
    Zhen, Lu
    ELECTRONIC RESEARCH ARCHIVE, 2023, 31 (08): : 4753 - 4772
  • [12] A Maximal Correlation Framework for Fair Machine Learning
    Lee, Joshua
    Bu, Yuheng
    Sattigeri, Prasanna
    Panda, Rameswar
    Wornell, Gregory W.
    Karlinsky, Leonid
    Feris, Rogerio Schmidt
    ENTROPY, 2022, 24 (04)
  • [13] Goal Orientation for Fair Machine Learning Algorithms
    Xu, Heng
    Zhang, Nan
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [14] On Fair Cost Sharing Games in Machine Learning
    Redko, Ievgen
    Laclau, Charlotte
    THIRTY-THIRD AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE / THIRTY-FIRST INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE / NINTH AAAI SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, : 4790 - 4797
  • [15] How fair is machine learning in credit lending?
    Babaei, Golnoosh
    Giudici, Paolo
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 40 (06) : 3452 - 3464
  • [16] Fair Machine Learning Under Partial Compliance
    Dai, Jessica
    Fazelpour, Sina
    Lipton, Zachary
    AIES '21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY, 2021, : 55 - 65
  • [17] Insights From Insurance for Fair Machine Learning
    Froehlich, Christian
    Williamson, Robert C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, ACM FACCT 2024, 2024, : 407 - 421
  • [18] Quantum machine learning
    Lu S.-C.
    Zheng Y.
    Wang X.-T.
    Wu R.-B.
    Wu, Re-Bing (rbwu@tsinghua.edu.cn), 2017, South China University of Technology (34): : 1429 - 1436
  • [19] Quantum machine learning
    Allcock, Jonathan
    Zhang, Shengyu
    NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2019, 6 (01) : 26 - +
  • [20] Quantum machine learning
    von Lilienfeld, O. Anatole
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 253