REVIEW: DAIRY FARM ELECTRICITY USE, CONSERVATION, AND RENEWABLE PRODUCTION-A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE

被引:13
|
作者
Mohsenimanesh, Ahmad [1 ]
LeRiche, Etienne L. [2 ]
Gordon, Robert [3 ]
Clarke, Steve [4 ]
MacDonald, Ronald D. [5 ]
MacKinnon, Ian [6 ]
VanderZaag, Andrew C. [7 ]
机构
[1] CanmetENERGY, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Agr & Agrifood Canada ORDC, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
[4] OMAFRA, Kemptville, ON, Canada
[5] Agviro Inc, Guelph, ON, Canada
[6] Wood Plc, Cambirdge, ON, Canada
[7] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Sci & Technol Branch, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Conservation; Dairy footprint; Electricity use; Electricity partitioning; Energy utilization index; Renewable energy; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; MILK-PRODUCTION; DIRECT WATER; CONSUMPTION; SYSTEMS; FEASIBILITY; BIOGAS; MODEL; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.13031/aea.14621
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
This review summarizes electricity use on dairy farms, with a focus on how energy is used, energy use indices (EUI), conservation strategies, and generation of renewable energy to reach net zero. EUI of electricity consumption varied between the identified studies primarily based on farm management system (confined, pasture-based), housing type (tie-stall, free-stall), and region (North America, Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania). The highest electricity usage was associated with milking and milk cooling systems, which, on average, accounted for 23% and 22% of total electricity use, respectively. Energy use scaled per cow (EUIc) was lower, on average, for pasture-based dairy systems than for confined systems (475 vs. 769 kWh cow(-1) y(-1)). Considering milk production, the average EUI scaled to milk (EUIm) was lower for pasture-based systems (6.6 kWh 100 kg(-1)) than for confined systems 9.2 kWh 100 kg(-1). Considering all non-irrigated farm types, EUIm averaged 7.7 kWh 100 kg(-1) and EUIc averaged 612 kWh cow(-1) y(-1). There was a large range of EUI, with higher values associated with automated milking systems and irrigation. Electricity consumption by the global dairy sector (excluding irrigation) was estimated using the average EUIm at approximately 64.2 TWh y(-1). The main conservation technologies include variable speed drives (milk vacuum pumps, milking systems, fans), pre-cool heat exchangers, refrigeration heat recovery systems, energy-efficient light fixtures (compact fluorescents, light emitting diodes), and efficient ventilation (high-volume low-speed fans). Theoretical savings of up to 32% overall could be achieved by combining several technologies. Feedback from electricity monitoring can inform dairy farmers of their energy use pattern to guide decisions to reduce consumption. Tools for predicting energy use and related costs on dairy farms, which can indicate potential energy savings from operational changes, were reviewed. By combining conservation methods with renewable energy from biogas or solar, many dairy farms can produce enough electricity to reach net zero electricity. For example, a hypothetical barn-based 250 milking-cow dairy farm consumed 1021 kWh cow(-1) y(-1), on average, and could produce approximately 1095 kWh cow(-1) y(-1) using a biodigester or 960 kWh cow(-1) y(-1) using rooftop photovoltaic solar panels.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 990
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A pasture growth model for use in a whole-farm dairy production model
    McCall, DG
    Bishop-Hurley, GJ
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2003, 76 (03) : 1183 - 1205
  • [22] In ovo delivery of bioactive substances: an alternative to the use of antibiotic growth promoters in poultry production-a review
    Oladokun, Samson
    Adewole, Deborah I.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (03): : 744 - 763
  • [23] Concentrated solar power for renewable electricity and hydrogen production from water-a review
    Coelho, B.
    Oliveira, A. C.
    Mendes, A.
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2010, 3 (10) : 1398 - 1405
  • [24] Organic photovoltaic water reservoir covers - dual purpose land use, renewable electricity and water conservation
    Magadley, Esther
    Yehia, Ibrahim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2022, 41 (02) : 148 - 163
  • [25] Contribution of renewable energy sources to electricity production in the autonomous community of Navarre (Spain):: A review
    Lopez Gonzalez, Luis Maria
    Sala Lizarraga, Jose Maria
    Miguez Tabares, Jose Luis
    Lopez Ochoa, Luis Maria
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2007, 11 (08): : 1776 - 1793
  • [26] Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: Review and results harmonization
    Asdrubali, Francesco
    Baldinelli, Giorgio
    D'Alessandro, Francesco
    Scrucca, Flavio
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 : 1113 - 1122
  • [27] Review of current position and perspectives of renewable energy in the Republic of Macedonia with focus on electricity production
    Mijakovski, Vladimir
    Mijakovski, Nikola
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (09): : 5068 - 5080
  • [28] Space-time variability of climate variables and intermittent renewable electricity production - A review
    Engeland, Kolbjorn
    Borga, Marco
    Creutin, Jean-Dominique
    Francois, Baptiste
    Ramos, Maria-Helena
    Vidal, Jean-Philippe
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 79 : 600 - 617
  • [29] Antimicrobials use and their indications in dairy farm and individual farmer production conditions in southern India
    Deepak Sharma
    Ayyasamy Manimaran
    Arumugam Kumaresan
    Muniandy Sivaram
    Duraisamy Rajendran
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2022, 54
  • [30] Antimicrobials use and their indications in dairy farm and individual farmer production conditions in southern India
    Sharma, Deepak
    Manimaran, Ayyasamy
    Kumaresan, Arumugam
    Sivaram, Muniandy
    Rajendran, Duraisamy
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2022, 54 (01)