REVIEW: DAIRY FARM ELECTRICITY USE, CONSERVATION, AND RENEWABLE PRODUCTION-A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE

被引:13
|
作者
Mohsenimanesh, Ahmad [1 ]
LeRiche, Etienne L. [2 ]
Gordon, Robert [3 ]
Clarke, Steve [4 ]
MacDonald, Ronald D. [5 ]
MacKinnon, Ian [6 ]
VanderZaag, Andrew C. [7 ]
机构
[1] CanmetENERGY, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Agr & Agrifood Canada ORDC, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
[4] OMAFRA, Kemptville, ON, Canada
[5] Agviro Inc, Guelph, ON, Canada
[6] Wood Plc, Cambirdge, ON, Canada
[7] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Sci & Technol Branch, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Conservation; Dairy footprint; Electricity use; Electricity partitioning; Energy utilization index; Renewable energy; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; MILK-PRODUCTION; DIRECT WATER; CONSUMPTION; SYSTEMS; FEASIBILITY; BIOGAS; MODEL; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.13031/aea.14621
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
This review summarizes electricity use on dairy farms, with a focus on how energy is used, energy use indices (EUI), conservation strategies, and generation of renewable energy to reach net zero. EUI of electricity consumption varied between the identified studies primarily based on farm management system (confined, pasture-based), housing type (tie-stall, free-stall), and region (North America, Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania). The highest electricity usage was associated with milking and milk cooling systems, which, on average, accounted for 23% and 22% of total electricity use, respectively. Energy use scaled per cow (EUIc) was lower, on average, for pasture-based dairy systems than for confined systems (475 vs. 769 kWh cow(-1) y(-1)). Considering milk production, the average EUI scaled to milk (EUIm) was lower for pasture-based systems (6.6 kWh 100 kg(-1)) than for confined systems 9.2 kWh 100 kg(-1). Considering all non-irrigated farm types, EUIm averaged 7.7 kWh 100 kg(-1) and EUIc averaged 612 kWh cow(-1) y(-1). There was a large range of EUI, with higher values associated with automated milking systems and irrigation. Electricity consumption by the global dairy sector (excluding irrigation) was estimated using the average EUIm at approximately 64.2 TWh y(-1). The main conservation technologies include variable speed drives (milk vacuum pumps, milking systems, fans), pre-cool heat exchangers, refrigeration heat recovery systems, energy-efficient light fixtures (compact fluorescents, light emitting diodes), and efficient ventilation (high-volume low-speed fans). Theoretical savings of up to 32% overall could be achieved by combining several technologies. Feedback from electricity monitoring can inform dairy farmers of their energy use pattern to guide decisions to reduce consumption. Tools for predicting energy use and related costs on dairy farms, which can indicate potential energy savings from operational changes, were reviewed. By combining conservation methods with renewable energy from biogas or solar, many dairy farms can produce enough electricity to reach net zero electricity. For example, a hypothetical barn-based 250 milking-cow dairy farm consumed 1021 kWh cow(-1) y(-1), on average, and could produce approximately 1095 kWh cow(-1) y(-1) using a biodigester or 960 kWh cow(-1) y(-1) using rooftop photovoltaic solar panels.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 990
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] TERMS OF INCREASED USE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES IN PRODUCTION OF ELECTRICITY
    Fialka, Miloslav
    Tuma, Jiri
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ELECTRIC POWER ENGINEERING 2007, 2007, : 15 - 22
  • [12] Global production potential of green methanol based on variable renewable electricity
    Fasihi, Mahdi
    Breyer, Christian
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 17 (10) : 3503 - 3522
  • [13] The Impact of Renewable Electricity Output on Sustainability in the Context of Circular Economy: A Global Perspective
    Laureti, Lucio
    Massaro, Alessandro
    Costantiello, Alberto
    Leogrande, Angelo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [14] Work-Related Injuries and Fatalities on Dairy Farm OperationsA Global Perspective
    Douphrate, David I.
    Stallones, Lorann
    Kolstrup, Christina Lunner
    Nonnenmann, Matthew W.
    Pinzke, Stefan
    Hagevoort, G. Robert
    Lundqvist, Peter
    Jakob, Martina
    Xiang, Huiyun
    Xue, Ling
    Jarvie, Paul
    McCurdy, Stephen A.
    Reed, Sue
    Lower, Tony
    JOURNAL OF AGROMEDICINE, 2013, 18 (03) : 256 - 264
  • [15] System Perspective on Biogas Use for Transport and Electricity Production
    Rosen, Tommy
    Odlund, Louise
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (21)
  • [16] Avian Use of Dairy Farm Ponds and Landowners' Perceptions of Their Management for Wildlife Conservation
    Belanger, Luc
    Maisonneuve, Charles
    Rodrigue, Jean
    BIRDS, 2021, 2 (04): : 476 - 491
  • [17] Is Globalization Driving the Use of Renewable Energy? A Global Macro Perspective
    Salman, Verda
    Ahmad, Imtiaz
    Alvi, Shahzad
    PROBLEMY EKOROZWOJU, 2023, 18 (01): : 68 - 80
  • [18] Global electricity demand, generation, grid system, and renewable energy polices: a review
    Hasanuzzaman, M.
    Zubir, Ummu Salamah
    Ilham, Nur Iqtiyani
    Che, Hang Seng
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 6 (03)
  • [19] Challenges in Green Hydrogen Production with Renewable and Varying Electricity Supply: An Electrochemical Engineering Perspective
    Liu, Jingjing
    Kennedy, John
    Marshall, Aaron
    Metson, James
    Taylor, Mark P.
    JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 169 (11)
  • [20] The Potential Use of Essential Oil Nanoemulsion as a Novel Alternative to Antibiotics in Poultry Production-A Review
    Baskara, A. P.
    Ariyadi, B.
    Dono, N. D.
    Martien, R.
    Zuprizal, Z.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 10 (02): : 203 - 212