Accuracy of swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry for intraocular lens power calculation: a retrospective cross-sectional study

被引:26
|
作者
An, Youngju [1 ]
Kang, Eun-Kyoung [2 ]
Kim, Hyojin [3 ,4 ]
Kang, Min-Ji [5 ]
Byun, Yong-Soo [5 ]
Joo, Choun-Ki [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Catholic Inst Visual Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Inha Univ, Dept Phys, Thin Film Opt Lab, Incheon, South Korea
[3] Baekseok Univ, Div Hlth Sci, Dept Visual Opt, Cheonan, South Korea
[4] Baekseok Univ, Grad Sch Hlth & Welf, Cheonan, South Korea
[5] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Coll Med, 505 Banpo Dong, Seoul 137040, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Intraocular lens power calculation; Cataract; Swept-source optical coherence tomography; Partial coherence interferometry; ULTRASOUND BIOMETRY; CATARACT; INTERFEROMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12886-019-1036-y
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo evaluate the accuracy of biometric measurements by a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) based biometry for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.MethodsThis retrospective observational study enrolled 431 patients undergoing cataract surgery. The charts were reviewed to investigate the failure rate of axial length (AL) measurement of the SS-OCT biometer, partial coherence interferometry (PCI), and A-scan ultrasonography (US) according to cataract type and severity. AL and keratometry in 164 eyes with the same IOL inserted were measured using the SS-OCT biometer, PCI, and A-scan US. The SRK/T formula was used to calculate IOL power. The mean absolute error (MAE) and percentage of eyes with a prediction error (PE) of 0.50 D were compared.ResultsThe AL measurement failure rate was 0.00% for A-scan US, 2.32% for the SS-OCT biometer, and 15.31% for PCI. The number of eyes measured using three devices (SS-OCT biometer, PCI, and A-scan US) was 128 (Group A) and the number of eyes measured using two devices (SS-OCT biometer and A-scan US) was 36 (Group B). The score of posterior subcapsular opacity was significantly different between two groups (p<.001). The SS-OCT biometer and PCI showed significantly lower MAE compared to A-scan US in Group A (p=0.027). Using SS-OCT biometer, MAE showed no significant difference between Group A (0.360.27) and Group B (0.36 +/- 0.31) (p=0.785). Whereas, MAE of A-scan US was significantly higher than Group A (0.47 +/- 0.39) in Group B (0.64 +/- 0.36) (p=0.023).Conclusions Using biometry with advanced OCT is useful in clinical practice as it is more effective in obtaining biometric measurements in the eyes with PSC and provides accurate measurements for IOL power calculation regardless of cataract type and severity.Trial registration Retrospectively registered. Registration number: KC16RISI1020. Registered 03 January 2018.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Anterior Segment Biometry During Accommodation and Effects of Cycloplegics by Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
    Mitsukawa, Tadahiro
    Suzuki, Yumi
    Momota, Yosuke
    Suzuki, Shun
    Yamada, Masakazu
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 : 1237 - 1243
  • [42] Detecting macular disease with a biometry device using swept-source optical coherence tomography Reply
    Hirnschall, Nino
    Leisser, Christoph
    Radda, Stephan
    Findl, Oliver
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (10): : 1545 - 1545
  • [43] Accuracy of Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Biomicroscopy for Evaluation of Posterior Lens Capsule in Traumatic Cataract
    Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali
    Soleimani, Mohammad
    Etesali, Hamed
    Naderan, Morteza
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 216 : 55 - 58
  • [44] Three-Dimensional Assessments of Intraocular Lens Stability With High-Speed Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
    Ding, Xixia
    Wang, Qinmei
    Xiang, Linfeng
    Chang, Pingjun
    Huang, Shenghai
    Zhao, Yun-e
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 36 (06) : 388 - +
  • [45] Integrated-optics-based swept-source optical coherence tomography
    Nguyen, V. Duc
    Weiss, N.
    Beeker, W.
    Hoekman, M.
    Leinse, A.
    Heideman, R. G.
    van Leeuwen, T. G.
    Kalkman, J.
    OPTICS LETTERS, 2012, 37 (23) : 4820 - 4822
  • [46] Noninvasive cross-sectional imaging of proximal caries using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) in vivo
    Shimada, Yasushi
    Nakagawa, Hisaichi
    Sadr, Alireza
    Wada, Ikumi
    Nakajima, Masatoshi
    Nikaido, Toru
    Otsuki, Masayuki
    Tagami, Junji
    Sumi, Yasunori
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHOTONICS, 2014, 7 (07) : 506 - 513
  • [47] Subgingival calculus imaging based on swept-source optical coherence tomography
    Hsieh, Yao-Sheng
    Ho, Yi-Ching
    Lee, Shyh-Yuan
    Lu, Chih-Wei
    Jiang, Cho-Pei
    Chuang, Ching-Cheng
    Wang, Chun-Yang
    Sun, Chia-Wei
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2011, 16 (07)
  • [48] Comparison study of the two biometers based on swept-source optical coherence tomography technology
    Wang, Xiaogang
    Dong, Jing
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [49] Comparison Study of the Two Biometers Based on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Technology
    Dong, Jing
    Yao, Jinhan
    Chang, Shuimiao
    Kanclerz, Piotr
    Khoramnia, Ramin
    Wang, Xiaogang
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (03)
  • [50] Implantable Collamer Lens Sizing Method Based on Swept-Source Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography
    Nakamura, Tomoaki
    Isogai, Naoki
    Kojima, Takashi
    Yoshida, Yoko
    Sugiyama, Yasuo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 187 : 99 - 107