3D and 1D micromagnetic calculation for hard/soft bilayers with in-plane easy axes

被引:36
|
作者
Zhang, Wei [1 ]
Zhao, G. P. [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, X. H. [1 ]
Ye, L. N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Normal Univ, Coll Phys & Elect Engn, Chengdu 610066, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, State Key Lab Elect Thin Films & Integrated Devic, Chengdu 610054, Peoples R China
[3] SW Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ Informat Engn, Chengdu 610074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hard/soft bilayer; Hysteresis loop; Micromagnetic calculation; REMANENCE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETS; NANOLAYERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.07.053
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Macroscopic hysteresis loops and microscopic magnetic moment distributions have been determined by three-dimensional (3D) as well as one-dimensional (1D) micromagnetic models for exchange coupled Nd2Fe14B/alpha-Fe bilayers and carefully compared with each other. It is found that the results obtained from the two methods are consistent with each other, where the nucleation and coercive fields decrease monotonically as the soft layer thickness L-s increases whilst the largest maximum energy products (roughly 600 kJ/m(3)) occur at L-s = 5 nm. Moreover, the calculated angular distributions in the thickness direction for the magnetic moments are similar. Nevertheless, the calculated critical fields and energy products by 3D OOMMF are systematically smaller than those given by the 1D model, mainly due to the local demagnetization fields, which are taken into account in the 3D calculation and ignored in the 1D calculation. It is demonstrated by the 3D calculation that the large demagnetization fields in the corners of the soft layers reduce the nucleation fields and thus facilitate the magnetic reversal. Such an effect enhancesas L-s increases. When L-s=20 nm, the differences between the coercivity is as large as 30%, while the nucleation fields obtained by the two methods have opposite signs. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4231 / 4236
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bridging the gap: from 1D to 3D genomics
    Yang, Lin
    Zhou, Tianyin
    Rohs, Remo
    JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS, 2013, 31 : 63 - 64
  • [32] CONDUCTIVITY OF 1D ELECTRONS IN ANISOTROPIC 3D MEDIUM
    MARIANER, S
    ZEVIN, V
    WEGER, M
    MOSES, D
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS C-SOLID STATE PHYSICS, 1982, 15 (18): : 3877 - 3896
  • [33] 1D and 3D resistivity inversions for geotechnical investigation
    Sultan, Sultan Awad
    Santos, Fernando A. Monteiro
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2008, 5 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [34] Reprogrammable 3D Shapes from 1D Metamaterial
    Ben-Abu, Ezra
    Zigelman, Anna
    Veksler, Yaron
    Givli, Sefi
    Filipov, Evgueni
    Lipson, Hod
    Gat, Amir D.
    ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES, 2025, 10 (04):
  • [35] Perception of 1D and 3D transversal wave motion
    Jain, A.
    Zaidi, Q.
    PERCEPTION, 2011, 40 : 173 - 173
  • [36] Decoupled 1D/3D Analysis of a Hydraulic Valve
    Mehring, Carsten
    Zopey, Ashok
    Latham, Matt
    Ihde, Thomas
    Massie, Dan
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING 2014 (ICCMSE 2014), 2014, 1618 : 979 - 982
  • [37] Nonmagnetic impurities in 1D and 3D triangular antiferromagnets
    Prozorova, LA
    Sosin, SS
    Zalizniak, IA
    PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER, 2000, 284 : 1629 - 1630
  • [38] BGK electron solitary waves: 1D and 3D
    Chen, LJ
    Parks, GK
    NONLINEAR PROCESSES IN GEOPHYSICS, 2002, 9 (02) : 111 - 119
  • [39] 1D and 3D radiative transfer in circumstellar disks
    Huegelmeyer, S. D.
    Dreizler, S.
    Homeier, D.
    Hauschildt, P. H.
    Barman, T.
    RECENT DIRECTIONS IN ASTROPHYSICAL QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY AND RADIATION HYDRODYNAMICS, 2009, 1171 : 93 - +
  • [40] Improving 1D Stellar Models with 3D Atmospheres
    Mosumgaard, Jakob Rorsted
    Aguirre, Victor Silva
    Weiss, Achim
    Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jorgen
    Trampedach, Regner
    SEISMOLOGY OF THE SUN AND THE DISTANT STARS 2016-USING TODAY'S SUCCESSES TO PREPARE THE FUTURE, 2017, 160