3D and 1D micromagnetic calculation for hard/soft bilayers with in-plane easy axes

被引:36
|
作者
Zhang, Wei [1 ]
Zhao, G. P. [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, X. H. [1 ]
Ye, L. N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Normal Univ, Coll Phys & Elect Engn, Chengdu 610066, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, State Key Lab Elect Thin Films & Integrated Devic, Chengdu 610054, Peoples R China
[3] SW Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ Informat Engn, Chengdu 610074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hard/soft bilayer; Hysteresis loop; Micromagnetic calculation; REMANENCE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETS; NANOLAYERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.07.053
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Macroscopic hysteresis loops and microscopic magnetic moment distributions have been determined by three-dimensional (3D) as well as one-dimensional (1D) micromagnetic models for exchange coupled Nd2Fe14B/alpha-Fe bilayers and carefully compared with each other. It is found that the results obtained from the two methods are consistent with each other, where the nucleation and coercive fields decrease monotonically as the soft layer thickness L-s increases whilst the largest maximum energy products (roughly 600 kJ/m(3)) occur at L-s = 5 nm. Moreover, the calculated angular distributions in the thickness direction for the magnetic moments are similar. Nevertheless, the calculated critical fields and energy products by 3D OOMMF are systematically smaller than those given by the 1D model, mainly due to the local demagnetization fields, which are taken into account in the 3D calculation and ignored in the 1D calculation. It is demonstrated by the 3D calculation that the large demagnetization fields in the corners of the soft layers reduce the nucleation fields and thus facilitate the magnetic reversal. Such an effect enhancesas L-s increases. When L-s=20 nm, the differences between the coercivity is as large as 30%, while the nucleation fields obtained by the two methods have opposite signs. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4231 / 4236
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laser Solitons in 1D, 2D and 3D
    Nikolay N. Rosanov
    Sergey V. Fedorov
    Nikolay A. Veretenov
    The European Physical Journal D, 2019, 73
  • [22] 3D, 2D, 1D - ADLER,DA
    BERNSTEIN, JE
    YOUNG CHILDREN, 1976, 31 (04): : 316 - 316
  • [23] Going from 3D to 1D: A 1D approach to common-envelope evolution
    Bronner, V. A.
    Schneider, F. R. N.
    Podsiadlowski, Ph.
    Roepke, F. K.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2024, 683
  • [24] Calculation of 1D and 2D densities in VMD: A flexible and easy-to-use code
    Wang, Yuxiang
    Kiziltas, Alper
    Blanchard, Patrick
    Walsh, Tiffany R.
    COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 266
  • [25] In-plane shear behavior of 3D spacer knitted fabrics
    Arumugam, Veerakumar
    Mishra, Rajesh
    Militky, Jiri
    Tunak, Maros
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL TEXTILES, 2016, 46 (03) : 868 - 886
  • [26] In-plane compression behavior of a novel 3D auxetic honeycomb
    Wei, Lulu
    Xu, Shiwei
    Zhu, Guohua
    Zhao, Xuan
    Shi, Peilong
    MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 35
  • [27] Evolution of in-plane heat transport in tellurium from 2D to 3D
    Cheng, Yanhua
    Ma, Jinlong
    Xu, Yaxin
    Sun, Guoqing
    Ruan, Xiulin
    Luo, Xiaobing
    MATERIALS TODAY PHYSICS, 2022, 27
  • [28] Comparison of in-plane mechanical properties of 2D and 3D woven composites
    Sun Y.
    Huang J.
    Han C.
    Zhao Z.
    Zhou H.
    Sun F.
    Li C.
    Zhang C.
    Zhang L.
    Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44 (18):
  • [29] Epigenetic characteristics of the mitotic chromosome in 1D and 3D
    Oomen, Marlies E.
    Dekker, Job
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2017, 52 (02) : 185 - 204
  • [30] FROM 1D TO 3D FERRIMAGNETS IN THE EDTA FAMILY
    CORONADO, E
    SAPIN, F
    GOMEZROMERO, P
    BELTRAN, D
    BURRIEL, R
    CARLIN, RL
    JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE, 1988, 49 (C-8): : 853 - 854