3D and 1D micromagnetic calculation for hard/soft bilayers with in-plane easy axes

被引:36
|
作者
Zhang, Wei [1 ]
Zhao, G. P. [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, X. H. [1 ]
Ye, L. N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Normal Univ, Coll Phys & Elect Engn, Chengdu 610066, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, State Key Lab Elect Thin Films & Integrated Devic, Chengdu 610054, Peoples R China
[3] SW Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ Informat Engn, Chengdu 610074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hard/soft bilayer; Hysteresis loop; Micromagnetic calculation; REMANENCE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETS; NANOLAYERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.07.053
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Macroscopic hysteresis loops and microscopic magnetic moment distributions have been determined by three-dimensional (3D) as well as one-dimensional (1D) micromagnetic models for exchange coupled Nd2Fe14B/alpha-Fe bilayers and carefully compared with each other. It is found that the results obtained from the two methods are consistent with each other, where the nucleation and coercive fields decrease monotonically as the soft layer thickness L-s increases whilst the largest maximum energy products (roughly 600 kJ/m(3)) occur at L-s = 5 nm. Moreover, the calculated angular distributions in the thickness direction for the magnetic moments are similar. Nevertheless, the calculated critical fields and energy products by 3D OOMMF are systematically smaller than those given by the 1D model, mainly due to the local demagnetization fields, which are taken into account in the 3D calculation and ignored in the 1D calculation. It is demonstrated by the 3D calculation that the large demagnetization fields in the corners of the soft layers reduce the nucleation fields and thus facilitate the magnetic reversal. Such an effect enhancesas L-s increases. When L-s=20 nm, the differences between the coercivity is as large as 30%, while the nucleation fields obtained by the two methods have opposite signs. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4231 / 4236
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determining Geometric Primitives for a 3D GIS Easy as 1D, 2D, 3D?
    Lonneville, Britt
    Stal, Cornelis
    De Roo, Berdien
    De Wulf, Alain
    De Maeyer, Philippe
    2015 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS THEORY, APPLICATIONS AND MANAGEMENT (GISTAM), 2015, : 135 - 140
  • [2] NUCLEATION FIELDS OF HARD MAGNETIC PARTICLES IN 2D MICROMAGNETIC AND 3D MICROMAGNETIC CALCULATIONS
    SCHREFL, T
    FIDLER, J
    KRONMULLER, H
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS, 1994, 138 (1-2) : 15 - 30
  • [3] On 3D and 1D Weyl particles in a 1D box
    De Vincenzo, Salvatore
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2020, 135 (10):
  • [4] On 3D and 1D Weyl particles in a 1D box
    Salvatore De Vincenzo
    The European Physical Journal Plus, 135
  • [5] On Calculation of the 3D Green's Function for 1D periodic Structures
    Zadorozhnyy, Andrey S.
    Skobelev, Sergei P.
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND TELECOMMUNICATION (ENT 2016), 2016, : 145 - 147
  • [6] 1-Soliton of the 1D magnetic system with an easy plane
    黄念宁
    陈宗蕴
    刘中柱
    ChineseScienceBulletin, 1995, (07) : 612 - 613
  • [7] In-plane elastic excitations in 1D polymeric photonic structures
    Cheng, W.
    Gorishnyy, T.
    Krikorian, V.
    Fytas, G.
    Thomas, E. L.
    MACROMOLECULES, 2006, 39 (26) : 9614 - 9620
  • [8] 1D Model for the 3D Magnetohydrodynamics
    Dai, Mimi
    Vyas, Bhakti
    Zhang, Xiangxiong
    JOURNAL OF NONLINEAR SCIENCE, 2023, 33 (05)
  • [9] 3D Instances as 1D Kernels
    Wu, Yizheng
    Shi, Min
    Du, Shuaiyuan
    Lu, Hao
    Cao, Zhiguo
    Zhong, Weicai
    COMPUTER VISION, ECCV 2022, PT XXIX, 2022, 13689 : 235 - 252
  • [10] 1D Model for the 3D Magnetohydrodynamics
    Mimi Dai
    Bhakti Vyas
    Xiangxiong Zhang
    Journal of Nonlinear Science, 2023, 33