New Robust Method to Study Flight Flutter Testing

被引:25
|
作者
Le Clainche, Soledad [1 ]
Moreno-Ramos, Ruben [2 ]
Taylor, Paul [3 ]
Vega, Jose M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Appl Math, Sch Aeronaut, ETSI Aeronaut & Espacio, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Altran Innovac, Loads & Dynam, Aeronaut Space & Def Div, 1 C Campezo, E-28022 Madrid, Spain
[3] Gulfstream Aerosp, Dynam, POB 2206,M-S R-04, Savannah, GA 31402 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2019年 / 56卷 / 01期
关键词
DYNAMIC-MODE DECOMPOSITION; BOUNDARY PREDICTION; IDENTIFICATION; TURBULENCE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.2514/1.C034863
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper presents the application of a new method, called higher-order dynamic mode decomposition (HODMD), to extract aircraft frequencies and damping in experimental data obtained from a flight flutter test. The method is an extension of standard dynamic mode decomposition, which is a method typically used to extract flow patterns and frequencies from unsteady fluid dynamics measurements or numerical simulations. In the fluid dynamic field, HODMD has proven to be a very efficient, robust, and accurate method to extract modes, frequencies, and damping from very noisy and large signals, with reduced manual interaction. In a similar way, this paper shows the good performance of this method when it is applied to the noisy data of this complex experiment. This fact sheds light on the new possibilities for the aerospace industry to incorporate HODMD to perform robust analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 343
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modeling, Design, and Flight Testing of Three Flutter Controllers for a Flying-Wing Drone
    Schmidt, David K.
    Danowsky, Brian P.
    Kotikalpudi, Aditya
    Theis, Julian
    Regan, Christopher D.
    Seiler, Peter J.
    Kapania, Rakesh K.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2020, 57 (04): : 615 - 634
  • [42] FLUTTER SUPPRESSOR FOR TRANSONIC FLIGHT
    DESTUYNDER, R
    RECHERCHE AEROSPATIALE, 1978, (03): : 117 - 123
  • [43] Comment on "Flutter prediction from flight flutter test data"
    Dimitriadis, G
    Cooper, JE
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2006, 43 (03): : 862 - 863
  • [44] Comment on flutter prediction from flight flutter test data
    University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
    不详
    不详
    Journal of Aircraft, 1600, 43 (03): : 862 - 863
  • [45] New Improved g Method for Flutter Solution
    Ju, Qiu
    Qin, Sun
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2009, 46 (06): : 2184 - 2186
  • [46] Study on a New Robust Forecasting Method and it's Application
    Zhang, Jilin
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 952 - 955
  • [47] A successive robust flutter prediction technique for aeroelastic systems using µ method
    Amit Kumar Onkar
    Meccanica, 2021, 56 : 2613 - 2629
  • [48] A successive robust flutter prediction technique for aeroelastic systems using μ method
    Onkar, Amit Kumar
    MECCANICA, 2021, 56 (10) : 2613 - 2629
  • [49] Comparison of Vane Type External Excitation and Free Air Turbulence Methods for Flutter Flight Testing
    Hafeez, M. Usman
    Ajmal, M.
    Khan, Tanveer A.
    Khan, Zubair
    2013 10TH INTERNATIONAL BHURBAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY (IBCAST), 2013, : 136 - 140
  • [50] Transmissibilty-based operational modal analysis for flight flutter testing using exogenous inputs
    Devriendt, Christof
    De Troyer, Tim
    De Sitter, Gert
    Guillaume, Patrick
    SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2012, 19 (05) : 1071 - 1083