New Robust Method to Study Flight Flutter Testing

被引:25
|
作者
Le Clainche, Soledad [1 ]
Moreno-Ramos, Ruben [2 ]
Taylor, Paul [3 ]
Vega, Jose M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Appl Math, Sch Aeronaut, ETSI Aeronaut & Espacio, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Altran Innovac, Loads & Dynam, Aeronaut Space & Def Div, 1 C Campezo, E-28022 Madrid, Spain
[3] Gulfstream Aerosp, Dynam, POB 2206,M-S R-04, Savannah, GA 31402 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2019年 / 56卷 / 01期
关键词
DYNAMIC-MODE DECOMPOSITION; BOUNDARY PREDICTION; IDENTIFICATION; TURBULENCE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.2514/1.C034863
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper presents the application of a new method, called higher-order dynamic mode decomposition (HODMD), to extract aircraft frequencies and damping in experimental data obtained from a flight flutter test. The method is an extension of standard dynamic mode decomposition, which is a method typically used to extract flow patterns and frequencies from unsteady fluid dynamics measurements or numerical simulations. In the fluid dynamic field, HODMD has proven to be a very efficient, robust, and accurate method to extract modes, frequencies, and damping from very noisy and large signals, with reduced manual interaction. In a similar way, this paper shows the good performance of this method when it is applied to the noisy data of this complex experiment. This fact sheds light on the new possibilities for the aerospace industry to incorporate HODMD to perform robust analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 343
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robust flutter margins of an F/A-18 aircraft from aeroelastic flight data
    Lind, R
    Brenner, M
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1997, 20 (03) : 597 - 604
  • [32] Development of a transient signal analysis method for flutter testing
    vonHatten, JT
    Ferman, MA
    STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS: RECENT ADVANCES, VOLS 1 & 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 615 - 626
  • [33] Flutter prediction from flight flutter test data
    Dimitriadis, G., 1600, American Inst. Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (38):
  • [34] Flutter prediction from flight flutter test data
    Dimitriadis, G
    Cooper, JE
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2001, 38 (02): : 355 - 367
  • [35] Flight testing of a new earth-to-orbit air-launch method
    Sarigul-Klijn, Marti
    Sarigul-Klijn, Nesrin
    Morgan, Bob
    Tighe, Jim
    Leon, Arnaldo
    Hudson, Gary
    McKinney, Bevin
    Gump, David
    Journal of Aircraft, 1600, 43 (03): : 577 - 583
  • [36] A New Safety Certification Method for High-risk Flight Testing Subjects
    Liu, Dongliang
    Xu, Haojun
    Zhou, Li
    Pei, Binbin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (WCICA 2012), 2012, : 3555 - 3560
  • [37] Flight testing of a new Earth-to-orbit air-launch method
    Sarigul-Klijn, M
    Sarigul-Klijn, N
    Morgan, B
    Tighe, J
    Leon, A
    Hudson, G
    McKinney, B
    Gump, D
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2006, 43 (03): : 577 - 583
  • [38] Efficient computation of robust flutter boundaries using the μ-k method
    Borglund, Dan
    Ringertz, Ulf
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2006, 43 (06): : 1763 - 1769
  • [39] Efficient computation of robust flutter boundaries using the μ-k method
    D., Borglund
    U., Ringertz
    Journal of Aircraft, 1600, 43 (06): : 1763 - 1769
  • [40] A THEORETICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE OSCILLATING CONTROL SURFACE FREQUENCY RESPONSE TECHNIQUE OF FLIGHT FLUTTER TESTING
    PEPPING, RA
    JOURNAL OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 1954, 21 (08): : 533 - 542