Three-dimensional analysis of pulmonary venous ostial and antral anatomy: Implications for balloon catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation

被引:52
|
作者
Ahmed, J
Sohal, S
Malchano, ZJ
Holmvang, G
Ruskin, JN
Reddy, VY
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Cardiac Arrhythmia Serv, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol,Cardiac MRI Unit, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Michigan State Med Sch, Lansing, MI USA
关键词
electrophysiology; magnetic resonance imaging; left atrium; pulmonary veins; atrial fibrillation; ablation; balloon catheter;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.00339.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Balloon ablation catheters using various energy sources are being developed to perform pulmonary vein (PV) isolation to treat atrial fibrillation. Prior evaluations of 2D CT/MR images are limited by the frequent elliptical shape of the PV ostia, the nonorthogonal orientation of the PVs to the left atrial (LA) chamber, and difficulty in appreciating through-slice curvature. To provide anatomical data relevant to balloon catheter ablation, 3D surface reconstructions of LA-PVs were generated and analyzed to define ostial architecture and size. Methods and Results: Using MRI datasets obtained from 101 paroxysmal AF patients, the LA-PVs were segmented to generate 3D LA-PV surface reconstructions. Using both external and endoluminal projections, the PV ostial and antral regions were identified and evaluated. In the left PVs, a common left-sided ostium was identified in 94 patients, with an ostial circumference of 95 +/- 15 mm. Branching of the left PVs occurred 0-5 mm away from the common left ostium in 43 patients (43%), 5-15 mm away from the common os in 37 patients (37%), and > 15 mm away from the common os in 14 patients (14%). In patients with either distinct left PV ostia, or common os < 15 mm (87 patients), the individual LSPV/LIPV ostial circumferences were 67 +/- 12 mm and 58 +/- 9 mm, respectively. Mean left antral circumference was 114 +/- 17 mm. In the right PVs, the ostial circumferences of the RSPV/RIPV were 68 +/- 11 mm and 66 +/- 11 mm, respectively. Mean right antral circumference was 107 +/- 19 mm. Assuming ideal deformation of the LA chamber anatomy, the minimal diameters of a balloon ablation catheter required to isolate 95% of the RSPV, RIPV, LSPV, LIPV, LCPV, left antrum, and right antrum are 29 mm, 28 mm, 29 mm, 24 mm, 40 mm, 46 mm, and 47 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Analysis of 3D surface reconstructions of LA-PV anatomy reveals that balloon catheter-based ablation of the PVs is likely feasible in most patients, but balloon ablation of the common PV antra would be problematic.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 255
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pulmonary Vein Isolation Guided by Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography
    Regoli, Francois
    Faletra, Francesco F.
    Scaglione, Marco
    Nucifora, Gaetano
    Moccetti, Tiziano
    Auricchio, Angelo
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (03): : E76 - E79
  • [32] Translational anatomy of the left atrium and esophagus as relevant to the pulmonary vein antral isolation for atrial fibrillation
    Tulika Gupta
    Neelkamal Cheema
    Arpan Randhawa
    Daisy Sahni
    Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2020, 42 : 367 - 376
  • [33] Translational anatomy of the left atrium and esophagus as relevant to the pulmonary vein antral isolation for atrial fibrillation
    Gupta, Tulika
    Cheema, Neelkamal
    Randhawa, Arpan
    Sahni, Daisy
    SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2020, 42 (04) : 367 - 376
  • [34] Intracardiac echocardiography guided nonocclusive balloon cryothermal applications to achieve antral isolation during pulmonary vein isolation
    Moussa Saleh
    Kristie M. Coleman
    Aditi S. Vaishnav
    Jamie Shein
    Parth Makker
    Nicholas Skipitaris
    Stavros E. Mountantonakis
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2021, 62 : 329 - 336
  • [35] Intracardiac echocardiography guided nonocclusive balloon cryothermal applications to achieve antral isolation during pulmonary vein isolation
    Saleh, Moussa
    Coleman, Kristie M.
    Vaishnav, Aditi S.
    Shein, Jamie
    Makker, Parth
    Skipitaris, Nicholas
    Mountantonakis, Stavros E.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 62 (02) : 329 - 336
  • [36] Full-motion two- and three-dimensional pulmonary vein imaging by intracardiac echo cardiography after pulmonary vein isolation
    Okumura, Yasuo
    Watanabe, Ichiro
    Ohkubo, Kimie
    Yamada, Takeshi
    Kawauchi, Kazunori
    Takagi, Yasuhro
    Ashino, Sonoko
    Kofune, Masayoshi
    Kofune, Tatsuya
    Hashimoto, Kenichi
    Shindo, Atsushi
    Sugimura, Hidezou
    Nakai, Toshiko
    Kunimoto, Satoshi
    Saito, Satoshi
    Hirayama, Atsushi
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 31 (04): : 409 - 417
  • [37] Pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation using a novel balloon cryoablation catheter
    Pitschner, H. F.
    Reddy, V.
    Kuniss, M.
    Neuzil, P.
    Laragy, M.
    Taborsky, M.
    Ruskin, J.
    Hamm, C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 : 131 - 131
  • [38] Pulmonary vein isolation using laser balloon as compared to standard radiofrequency catheter ablation
    Koopman, Pieter
    Vanhentenrijk, Simon
    Schurmans, Joris
    Dining, Dagmara
    Vijgen, Johan
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2017, 72 (01) : 89 - 90
  • [39] Pulmonary vein isolation using a visually guided laser balloon catheter in a spanish center
    Andres Lahuerta, A.
    Alonso Fernandez, P.
    Jimenez Carreno, R.
    Osca Asensi, J.
    Cano Perez, O.
    Igual Munoz, B.
    Sancho Tello De Carranza, M. J.
    Olague De Ros, J.
    Salvador Sanz, A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 943 - 943
  • [40] Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Laser Balloon as Compared to Standard Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation
    Koopman, Pieter
    Vanhentenrijk, Simon
    Schurmans, Joris
    Dilling, Dagmara
    Vijgen, Johan
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (05) : 600 - 601