A survey of selected animal-based measures of dairy cattle welfare in the Eastern Alps: Toward context-based thresholds

被引:27
|
作者
Zuliani, A. [1 ]
Mair, M. [2 ]
Krasevec, M. [3 ]
Lora, I. [4 ]
Brscic, M. [4 ]
Cozzi, G. [2 ,4 ]
Leeb, C.
Zupan, M. [3 ]
Winckler, C. [2 ]
Bovolenta, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Udine, Dept Food Agr Environm & Anim Sci, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[2] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Dept Sustainable Agr Syst, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Dept Anim Sci, Domzale 1230, Slovenia
[4] Univ Padua, Dept Anim Med Prod & Hlth, I-35020 Legnaro, Italy
关键词
mountain farm; small-scale; animal welfare; benchmarking; MILK-PRODUCTION; COWS; PASTURE; HEALTH; HERDS; PREVALENCE; INJURIES; LAMENESS; SYSTEMS; SWISS;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2017-13257
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In the Alps, traditional dairy farms are small-scale operations where vertical transhumance from valley indoor housing systems to highland pasture-based systems is still practiced in summer. Vertical transhumance implies a substantial change of environment, available resources, and management practices from one season to another. In such systems, animal-based welfare measures need to be monitored throughout the year to capture the variation of welfare outcomes, based on which targeted welfare management plans can be implemented. Because the Welfare Quality assessment approach has been tailored to indoor housing and intensive farming systems, the European Food Safety Authority recently developed a welfare assessment protocol for small-scale dairy cattle farms adapted after the Welfare Quality framework. The aim of this study was to assess nonbehavioral animal-based measures as defined by this protocol at different time points for transhumant systems in the Alps. In total, 18 animal-based measures were assessed before, during, and after the mountain pasture period in a sample of 67 small-scale dairy cattle farms practicing vertical transhumance in neighboring provinces of Austria, Italy, and Slovenia. Significant differences between assessments were identified for dirtiness of legs and teats, hairless patches, lesions and swellings, claw condition, ocular discharge, and diarrhea whereas BCS, lameness/severe lameness, vulvar discharge, nasal discharge, and hampered respiration were unchanged between seasons. In addition, a benchmarking exercise was carried out to identify relative boundaries (worst quartile thresholds) for each animal-based measure and to contribute to the discussion about achievable welfare outcomes for the 2 husbandry conditions that characterize a transhumant system. Worst quartile thresholds indicated a high prevalence of dirtiness (>80%) when cows were kept indoors, high prevalence of hairless patches (65%) before pasture turnout, and high prevalence of very lean cows (>13%) throughout the assessments. On the other hand, the best quartile thresholds for most clinical conditions suggested that high welfare standards (zero prevalence) are widely achievable in mountain farms practicing vertical transhumance during all assessments. The thresholds identified through benchmarking should serve as the basis for an effective context-based welfare management strategy promoting continuous welfare improvement on-farm.
引用
收藏
页码:1428 / 1436
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Can animal-based welfare assessment be simplified? A comparison of the Welfare Quality® protocol for dairy cattle and the simpler and less time-consuming protocol developed by the Danish Cattle Federation
    Andreasen, S. N.
    Sandoe, P.
    Forkman, B.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2014, 23 (01) : 81 - 94
  • [32] The use of animal-based measures to evaluate tie stall design on dairy farms in Ontario
    Zurbrigg, K.
    Kelton, D.
    Anderson, N.
    Millman, S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 83 : 373 - 373
  • [33] The use of animal-based measures to evaluate tie stall design on dairy farms in Ontario
    Zurbrigg, K.
    Kelton, D.
    Anderson, N.
    Millman, S.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2005, 88 : 373 - 373
  • [34] Can environmental variables replace some animal-based parameters in welfare assessment of dairy cows?
    Muelleder, C.
    Troxler, J.
    Laaha, G.
    Waiblinger, S.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2007, 16 (02) : 153 - 156
  • [35] Animal-based welfare indicators for dairy cows and their validity and practicality: a systematic review of the existing literature
    Linstaedt, Jenny
    Thoene-Reineke, Christa
    Merle, Roswitha
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [36] Animal-Based Measurements to Assess the Welfare of Dairy Cull Cows during Pre-Slaughter
    Romero, Marlyn H.
    Rodriguez-Palomares, Magali
    Sanchez, Jorge Alberto
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (10): : 1 - 19
  • [37] Preventive Hoof Trimming and Animal-Based Welfare Measures Influence the Time to First Lameness Event and Hoof Lesion Prevalence in Dairy Cows
    Sadiq, Mohammed B.
    Ramanoon, Siti Z.
    Mossadeq, Wan Mastura M. Shaik
    Mansor, Rozaihan
    Syed-Hussain, Sharifah S.
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [38] Assessing the welfare of laboratory mice in their home environment using animal-based measures - a benchmarking tool
    Spangenberg, Elin M. F.
    Keeling, Linda J.
    LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2016, 50 (01) : 30 - 38
  • [39] Animal-based measures on fattening heavy pigs at the slaughterhouse and the association with animal welfare at the farm level: a preliminary study
    Maisano, A. M.
    Luini, M.
    Vitale, N.
    Nodari, S. Rota
    Scali, F.
    Alborali, G. L.
    Vezzoli, F.
    ANIMAL, 2020, 14 (01) : 108 - 118
  • [40] The associations between animal-based welfare measures and the presence of indicators of food safety in finishing pigs
    Alpigiani, I.
    Bacci, C.
    Keeling, L. J.
    Salman, M. D.
    Brindani, F.
    Pongolini, S.
    Hitchens, P. L.
    Bonardi, S.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2016, 25 (03) : 355 - 363