A survey of selected animal-based measures of dairy cattle welfare in the Eastern Alps: Toward context-based thresholds

被引:27
|
作者
Zuliani, A. [1 ]
Mair, M. [2 ]
Krasevec, M. [3 ]
Lora, I. [4 ]
Brscic, M. [4 ]
Cozzi, G. [2 ,4 ]
Leeb, C.
Zupan, M. [3 ]
Winckler, C. [2 ]
Bovolenta, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Udine, Dept Food Agr Environm & Anim Sci, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[2] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Dept Sustainable Agr Syst, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Dept Anim Sci, Domzale 1230, Slovenia
[4] Univ Padua, Dept Anim Med Prod & Hlth, I-35020 Legnaro, Italy
关键词
mountain farm; small-scale; animal welfare; benchmarking; MILK-PRODUCTION; COWS; PASTURE; HEALTH; HERDS; PREVALENCE; INJURIES; LAMENESS; SYSTEMS; SWISS;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2017-13257
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In the Alps, traditional dairy farms are small-scale operations where vertical transhumance from valley indoor housing systems to highland pasture-based systems is still practiced in summer. Vertical transhumance implies a substantial change of environment, available resources, and management practices from one season to another. In such systems, animal-based welfare measures need to be monitored throughout the year to capture the variation of welfare outcomes, based on which targeted welfare management plans can be implemented. Because the Welfare Quality assessment approach has been tailored to indoor housing and intensive farming systems, the European Food Safety Authority recently developed a welfare assessment protocol for small-scale dairy cattle farms adapted after the Welfare Quality framework. The aim of this study was to assess nonbehavioral animal-based measures as defined by this protocol at different time points for transhumant systems in the Alps. In total, 18 animal-based measures were assessed before, during, and after the mountain pasture period in a sample of 67 small-scale dairy cattle farms practicing vertical transhumance in neighboring provinces of Austria, Italy, and Slovenia. Significant differences between assessments were identified for dirtiness of legs and teats, hairless patches, lesions and swellings, claw condition, ocular discharge, and diarrhea whereas BCS, lameness/severe lameness, vulvar discharge, nasal discharge, and hampered respiration were unchanged between seasons. In addition, a benchmarking exercise was carried out to identify relative boundaries (worst quartile thresholds) for each animal-based measure and to contribute to the discussion about achievable welfare outcomes for the 2 husbandry conditions that characterize a transhumant system. Worst quartile thresholds indicated a high prevalence of dirtiness (>80%) when cows were kept indoors, high prevalence of hairless patches (65%) before pasture turnout, and high prevalence of very lean cows (>13%) throughout the assessments. On the other hand, the best quartile thresholds for most clinical conditions suggested that high welfare standards (zero prevalence) are widely achievable in mountain farms practicing vertical transhumance during all assessments. The thresholds identified through benchmarking should serve as the basis for an effective context-based welfare management strategy promoting continuous welfare improvement on-farm.
引用
收藏
页码:1428 / 1436
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] New animal-based measures to assess welfare in dromedary camels
    Menchetti, Laura
    Faye, Bernard
    Padalino, Barbara
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2021, 53 (06)
  • [12] Welfare Assessment on Pasture: A Review on Animal-Based Measures for Ruminants
    Spigarelli, Chiara
    Zuliani, Anna
    Battini, Monica
    Mattiello, Silvana
    Bovolenta, Stefano
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (04):
  • [13] Animal-Based Measures to Assess the Welfare of Extensively Managed Ewes
    Munoz, Carolina
    Campbell, Angus
    Hemsworth, Paul
    Doyle, Rebecca
    ANIMALS, 2018, 8 (01):
  • [14] Animal-Based Measures for the On-Farm Welfare Assessment of Geese
    Tremolada, Carlo
    Bielinska, Halina
    Minero, Michela
    Ferrante, Valentina
    Canali, Elisabetta
    Barbieri, Sara
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (05):
  • [15] Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records
    Whay, HR
    Main, DCJ
    Green, LE
    Webster, AJF
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2003, 153 (07) : 197 - 202
  • [16] Animal-Based Welfare Assessment of Cattle and Water Buffalo in Bangladeshi Slaughterhouses
    Alam, Mohammad Rashedul
    Islam, Md. Jahirul
    Amin, Al
    Shaikat, Amir Hossan
    Pasha, Md. Ridoan
    Doyle, Rebecca E.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 2020, 23 (02) : 219 - 230
  • [17] Scientific Opinion on the use of animal-based measures to assess welfare in pigs
    Botner, Anette
    Broom, Donald
    Doherr, Marcus G.
    Domingo, Mariano
    Hartung, Joerg
    Keeling, Linda
    Koenen, Frank
    More, Simon
    Morton, David
    Oltenacu, Pascal
    Salati, Fulvio
    Salman, Mo
    Sanaa, Moez
    Sharp, James M.
    Stegeman, Jan A.
    Szucs, Endre
    Thulke, Hans-H.
    Vannier, Philippe
    Webster, John
    Wierup, Martin
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (01)
  • [19] Scientific Opinion on the use of animal-based measures to assess welfare of broilers
    Botner, Anette
    Broom, Donald
    Doherr, Marcus G.
    Domingo, Mariano
    Hartung, Jorg
    Keeling, Linda
    Koenen, Frank
    More, Simon
    Morton, David
    Oltenacu, Pascal A.
    Salati, Fulvio
    Salman, Mo
    Sanaa, Moez
    Sharp, James M.
    Stegeman, Jan A.
    Szucs, Endre
    Thulke, Hans-H
    Varmier, Philippe
    Webster, John
    Wierup, Martin
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (07)
  • [20] Assessing the welfare of kennelled dogs-A review of animal-based measures
    Polgar, Zita
    Blackwell, Emily J.
    Rooney, Nicola J.
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2019, 213 : 1 - 13