The evolution of trust and trustworthiness

被引:80
|
作者
Kumar, Aanjaneya [1 ]
Capraro, Valerio [2 ]
Perc, Matjaz [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci Educ & Res, Dept Phys, Dr Homi Bhabha Rd, Pune 411008, Maharashtra, India
[2] Middlesex Univ, Dept Econ, London NW4 4BT, England
[3] Univ Maribor, Fac Nat Sci & Math, Koroska Cesta 160, Maribor 2000, Slovenia
[4] China Med Univ, China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[5] Complex Sci Hub Vienna, Josefstadterstr 39, A-1080 Vienna, Austria
关键词
trust; trustworthiness; prosociality; evolution; ULTIMATUM GAME; EXPECTATIONS; COOPERATION; ADVANTAGE; ALTRUISM; BEHAVIOR; TRAGEDY;
D O I
10.1098/rsif.2020.0491
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Trust and trustworthiness form the basis for continued social and economic interactions, and they are also fundamental for cooperation, fairness, honesty, and indeed for many other forms of prosocial and moral behaviour. However, trust entails risks, and building a trustworthy reputation requires effort. So how did trust and trustworthiness evolve, and under which conditions do they thrive? To find answers, we operationalize trust and trustworthiness using the trust game with the trustor's investment and the trustee's return of the investment as the two key parameters. We study this game on different networks, including the complete network, random and scale-free networks, and in the well-mixed limit. We show that in all but one case, the network structure has little effect on the evolution of trust and trustworthiness. Specifically, for well-mixed populations, lattices, random and scale-free networks, we find that trust never evolves, while trustworthiness evolves with some probability depending on the game parameters and the updating dynamics. Only for the scale-free network with degree non-normalized dynamics, we find parameter values for which trust evolves but trustworthiness does not, as well as values for which both trust and trustworthiness evolve. We conclude with a discussion about mechanisms that could lead to the evolution of trust and outline directions for future work.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Trust and Trustworthiness in Young and Older Adults
    Bailey, Phoebe E.
    Slessor, Gillian
    Rieger, Matthias
    Rendell, Peter G.
    Moustafa, Ahmed A.
    Ruffman, Ted
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2015, 30 (04) : 977 - 986
  • [42] INTERPERSONAL-TRUST AND TRUSTWORTHINESS IN PREADOLESCENTS
    DOSTER, JT
    CHANCE, J
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 93 (01): : 71 - 79
  • [43] The impact of fairness on trustworthiness and trust in banking
    Roy, Sanjit Kumar
    Devlin, James F.
    Sekhon, Harjit
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2015, 31 (9-10) : 996 - 1017
  • [44] Do trust and trustworthiness pay off ?
    Slemrod, J
    Katuscák, P
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2005, 40 (03) : 621 - 646
  • [45] Trust and trustworthiness in a sequential bargaining game
    Chaudhuri, A
    Khan, SA
    Lakshmiratan, A
    Py, AL
    Shah, L
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 16 (05) : 331 - 340
  • [46] Trust, Trustworthiness, and Age: Experimental Evidence
    Lukas, Moritz
    Noeth, Markus
    JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK, 2021, 241 (04): : 419 - 436
  • [47] INTERPERSONAL-TRUST, TRUSTWORTHINESS, AND GULLIBILITY
    ROTTER, JB
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1980, 35 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [48] Trust, trustworthiness, and traditional Islamic education
    Asadullah, M. Niaz
    OXFORD DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2016, 44 (02) : 152 - 166
  • [49] The impact of payoff interdependence on trust and trustworthiness
    Gueth, Werner
    Levati, M. Vittoria
    Ploner, Matteo
    GERMAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 9 (01) : 87 - 95
  • [50] A difficulty with oaths: On trust, trustworthiness, and signalling
    Braham M.
    Bolle F.
    European Journal of Law and Economics, 2006, 22 (3) : 219 - 232