The evolution of trust and trustworthiness

被引:80
|
作者
Kumar, Aanjaneya [1 ]
Capraro, Valerio [2 ]
Perc, Matjaz [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci Educ & Res, Dept Phys, Dr Homi Bhabha Rd, Pune 411008, Maharashtra, India
[2] Middlesex Univ, Dept Econ, London NW4 4BT, England
[3] Univ Maribor, Fac Nat Sci & Math, Koroska Cesta 160, Maribor 2000, Slovenia
[4] China Med Univ, China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[5] Complex Sci Hub Vienna, Josefstadterstr 39, A-1080 Vienna, Austria
关键词
trust; trustworthiness; prosociality; evolution; ULTIMATUM GAME; EXPECTATIONS; COOPERATION; ADVANTAGE; ALTRUISM; BEHAVIOR; TRAGEDY;
D O I
10.1098/rsif.2020.0491
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Trust and trustworthiness form the basis for continued social and economic interactions, and they are also fundamental for cooperation, fairness, honesty, and indeed for many other forms of prosocial and moral behaviour. However, trust entails risks, and building a trustworthy reputation requires effort. So how did trust and trustworthiness evolve, and under which conditions do they thrive? To find answers, we operationalize trust and trustworthiness using the trust game with the trustor's investment and the trustee's return of the investment as the two key parameters. We study this game on different networks, including the complete network, random and scale-free networks, and in the well-mixed limit. We show that in all but one case, the network structure has little effect on the evolution of trust and trustworthiness. Specifically, for well-mixed populations, lattices, random and scale-free networks, we find that trust never evolves, while trustworthiness evolves with some probability depending on the game parameters and the updating dynamics. Only for the scale-free network with degree non-normalized dynamics, we find parameter values for which trust evolves but trustworthiness does not, as well as values for which both trust and trustworthiness evolve. We conclude with a discussion about mechanisms that could lead to the evolution of trust and outline directions for future work.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is Trustworthiness a formal Object of Trust?
    Schmid, Hans Bernhard
    DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHIE, 2016, 64 (01): : 89 - 102
  • [32] Problems of Trust: A Question of Trustworthiness
    Henderson, Martha L.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2012, 25 (01): : 107 - 109
  • [33] Trust, trustworthiness and AI governance
    Christian Lahusen
    Martino Maggetti
    Marija Slavkovik
    Scientific Reports, 14 (1)
  • [34] Testimonial Trustworthiness: Truthfulness and Trust
    Siebert, Matthew Kent
    AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2018, 92 (02) : 249 - 276
  • [35] TRUST, TRUSTWORTHINESS, AND THE F SCALE
    DEUTSCH, M
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 61 (01): : 138 - 140
  • [36] The Importance of Trust and the Importance of Trustworthiness
    Salloch, Sabine
    Waescher, Sebastian
    Vollmann, Jochen
    Schildmann, Jan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2015, 15 (09): : 27 - 28
  • [37] Does trust beget trustworthiness? Trust and trustworthiness in two games and two cultures: A research note
    Kiyonari, Toko
    Yamagishi, Toshio
    Cook, Karen S.
    Cheshire, Coye
    SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2006, 69 (03) : 270 - 283
  • [38] An experimental analysis of trust and trustworthiness
    Chaudhuri, Ananish
    Gangadharan, Lata
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2007, 73 (04) : 959 - 985
  • [39] Trust, Trustworthiness Essential for AI Systems
    不详
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2024, 67 (04) : 17 - 17
  • [40] Trust Me: Multimodal Signals of Trustworthiness
    Lucas, Gale
    Stratou, Giota
    Lieblich, Shari
    Gratch, Jonathan
    ICMI'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION, 2016, : 5 - 12