Reassessment of the Access Testosterone chemiluminescence assay and comparison with LC-MS method

被引:18
|
作者
Dittadi, Ruggero [1 ]
Matteucci, Mara [2 ]
Meneghetti, Elisa [1 ]
Ndreu, Rudina [3 ]
机构
[1] ULSS 3 Serenissima, Osped Angelo, UOC Lab Anal, Lab Med Dept, Venice, Italy
[2] Eureka Srl, Lab Div, Chiaravalle, AN, Italy
[3] CNR Clin Physiol Inst, Pisa, Italy
关键词
cross-reaction; DxI platform; immunoassay method; liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; LoQ; testosterone; IMMUNOASSAYS; MS/MS; SERUM;
D O I
10.1002/jcla.22286
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Aim of the studyTo reassess the imprecision and Limit of Quantitation, to evaluate the cross-reaction with dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS), the accuracy toward liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and the reference interval of the Access Testosterone method, performed by DxI immunoassay platform (Beckman Coulter). Material and MethodsImprecision was evaluated testing six pool samples assayed in 20 different run using two reagents lots. The cross-reaction with DHEAS was studied both by a displacement curve and by spiking DHEAS standard in two serum samples with known amount of testosterone. The comparison with LC-MS was evaluated by Passing-Bablock analysis in 21 routine serum samples and 19 control samples from an External Quality Assurance (EQA) scheme. The reference interval was verified by an indirect estimation on 2445 male and 2838 female outpatients. ResultsThe imprecision study showed a coefficient of variation (CV) between 2.7% and 34.7% for serum pools from 16.3 and 0.27nmol/L. The value of Limit of Quantitation at 20% CV was 0.53nmol/L. The DHEAS showed a cross-reaction of 0.0074%. A comparison with LC-MS showed a trend toward a slight underestimation of immunoassay vs LC-MS (Passing-Bablock equations: DxI=-0.24+0.906 LCMS in serum samples and DxI=-0.299+0.981 LCMS in EQA samples). The verification of reference interval showed a 2.5th-97.5th percentile distribution of 6.6-24.3nmol/L for male over 14years and <0.5-2.78nmol/L for female subjects, in accord with the reference intervals reported by the manufacturer. ConclusionsThe Access Testosterone method could be considered an adequately reliable tool for the testosterone measurement.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sensitive LC-MS/MS Assay for Total Testosterone Quantification on Unit Resolution and High-Resolution Instruments
    Wolken, Jill K.
    Peterson, Meghan M.
    Cao, Wenjing
    Challoner, Keith
    Jin, Zhicheng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (23)
  • [32] Development of a CDC-certified total testosterone assay for adult and pediatric samples using LC-MS/MS
    Star-Weinstock, Michal
    Dey, Subhakar
    CLINICAL MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2019, 13 : 27 - 35
  • [33] Method for detecting classes of microcystins by combination of protein phosphatase inhibition assay and ELISA: comparison with LC-MS
    Mountfort, DO
    Holland, P
    Sprosen, J
    TOXICON, 2005, 45 (02) : 199 - 206
  • [34] Comparison of 7 Published LC-MS/MS Methods for the Simultaneous Measurement of Testosterone, Androstenedione, and Dehydroepiandrosterone in Serum
    Buttler, Rahel M.
    Martens, Frans
    Fanelli, Flaminia
    Pham, Hai T.
    Kushnir, Mark M.
    Janssen, Marcel J. W.
    Owen, Laura
    Taylor, Angela E.
    Soeborg, Tue
    Blankenstein, Marinus A.
    Heijboer, Annemieke C.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2015, 61 (12) : 1475 - 1483
  • [35] Comparison of eight routine unpublished LC-MS/MS methods for the simultaneous measurement of testosterone and androstenedione in serum
    Buttler, Rahel M.
    Martens, Frans
    Ackermans, Mariette T.
    Davison, Andrew S.
    van Herwaarden, Antonius E.
    Kortz, Linda
    Krabbe, Johannes G.
    Lentjes, Eef G. W.
    Syme, Charlotte
    Webster, Rachel
    Blankenstein, Marinus A.
    Heijboer, Annemieke C.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2016, 454 : 112 - 118
  • [36] LC-MS/MS identification of testosterone acetate in the mane of a racing horse
    Kintz, Pascal
    Gheddar, Laurie
    TOXICOLOGIE ANALYTIQUE ET CLINIQUE, 2022, 34 (03) : 159 - 164
  • [37] LC-MS/MS method for pyrithroids analysis
    Cassias, Irene
    Chang, Eugene
    Wilson, Sarah
    Lane, Shannon
    Barrera, Trojan
    Blount, Janet
    Limson, Andrew
    Ajayi, Olusegun
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [38] The DRI® cotinine assay on the hitachi 917 analyzer -: Comparison to GCMS and LC-MS/MS.
    LeGatt, D.
    Shalapay, C.
    Langman, L.
    Adler, A.
    Lien, D.
    Jackson, K.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 52 (06) : A66 - A67
  • [39] Evaluation of the Waters MassTrak LC-MS/MS Assay for Tacrolimus and a Comparison to the Abbott Architect Immunoassay
    Saitman, Alec
    Metushi, Imir G.
    Mason, Donald S.
    Fitzgerald, Robert L.
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2016, 38 (03) : 300 - 304
  • [40] Comparison of a chemiluminescence immunoassay with LC-MS/MS in the determination of the plasma aldosterone concentration in patients with impaired renal function
    Zeng, Qiurong
    Li, Junlong
    Yang, Yi
    He, Yifan
    Song, Ying
    Hu, Jinbo
    Wang, Yue
    Li, Qifu
    Yang, Shumin
    STEROIDS, 2025, 213