Model-checking techniques based on cumulative residuals

被引:220
|
作者
Lin, DY
Wei, LJ
Ying, Z
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Stat, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
generalized linear models; goodness of fit; link function; longitudinal data; marginal models; model misspecification; regression diagnostics; residual plots; transformation;
D O I
10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00001.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Residuals have long been used for graphical and numerical examinations of the adequacy of regression models. Conventional residual analysis based on the plots of raw residuals or their smoothed curves is highly subjective, whereas most numerical goodness-of-fit tests provide little information about the nature of model misspecification. In this paper, we develop objective and informative model-checking techniques by taking the cumulative sums of residuals over certain coordinates (e.g., covariates or fitted values) or by considering some related aggregates of residuals, such as moving sums and moving averages. For a variety of statistical models and data structures, including generalized linear models with independent or dependent observations, the distributions of these stochastic processes under the assumed model can be approximated by the distributions of certain zero-mean Gaussian processes whose realizations can be easily generated by computer simulation. Each observed process can then be compared, both graphically and numerically, with a number of realizations from the Gaussian process. Such comparisons enable one to assess objectively whether a trend seen in a residual plot reflects model misspecification or natural variation. The proposed techniques are particularly useful in checking the functional form of a covariate and the link function. Illustrations with several medical studies are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Model-checking -: A tutorial introduction
    Müller-Olm, M
    Schmidt, D
    Steffen, B
    STATIC ANALYSIS, 1999, 1694 : 330 - 354
  • [32] Model-checking with coverability graphs
    Schmidt, K
    FORMAL METHODS IN SYSTEM DESIGN, 1999, 15 (03) : 239 - 254
  • [33] Model-checking processes with data
    Groote, JF
    Willemse, TAC
    SCIENCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, 2005, 56 (03) : 251 - 273
  • [34] Model-checking hierarchical structures
    Lohrey, M
    LICS 2005: 20TH ANNUAL IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON LOGIC IN COMPUTER SCIENCE - PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 168 - 177
  • [35] Model-Checking with Coverability Graphs
    Karsten Schmidt
    Formal Methods in System Design, 1999, 15 : 239 - 254
  • [36] Model-Checking of Smart Contracts
    Nehai, Zeinab
    Piriou, Pierre-Yves
    Daumas, Frederic
    IEEE 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CYBERMATICS / 2018 IEEE CONFERENCES ON INTERNET OF THINGS, GREEN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, CYBER, PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL COMPUTING, SMART DATA, BLOCKCHAIN, COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2018, : 980 - 987
  • [37] Model-checking iterated games
    Huang, Chung-Hao
    Schewe, Sven
    Wang, Farn
    ACTA INFORMATICA, 2017, 54 (07) : 625 - 654
  • [38] Model-Checking Process Equivalences
    Lange, Martin
    Lozes, Etienne
    Guzman, Manuel Vargas
    ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2012, (96): : 43 - 56
  • [39] Model-checking hierarchical structures
    Lohrey, Markus
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 78 (02) : 461 - 490
  • [40] A Model-Checking Approach for Fault Analysis Based on Configurable Model Extraction
    Ogawa, Hideto
    Ichii, Makoto
    Myojin, Tomoyuki
    Chikahisa, Masaki
    Nakagawa, Yuichiro
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION AND SYSTEMS, 2015, E98D (06): : 1150 - 1160