Model-checking techniques based on cumulative residuals

被引:220
|
作者
Lin, DY
Wei, LJ
Ying, Z
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Stat, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
generalized linear models; goodness of fit; link function; longitudinal data; marginal models; model misspecification; regression diagnostics; residual plots; transformation;
D O I
10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00001.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Residuals have long been used for graphical and numerical examinations of the adequacy of regression models. Conventional residual analysis based on the plots of raw residuals or their smoothed curves is highly subjective, whereas most numerical goodness-of-fit tests provide little information about the nature of model misspecification. In this paper, we develop objective and informative model-checking techniques by taking the cumulative sums of residuals over certain coordinates (e.g., covariates or fitted values) or by considering some related aggregates of residuals, such as moving sums and moving averages. For a variety of statistical models and data structures, including generalized linear models with independent or dependent observations, the distributions of these stochastic processes under the assumed model can be approximated by the distributions of certain zero-mean Gaussian processes whose realizations can be easily generated by computer simulation. Each observed process can then be compared, both graphically and numerically, with a number of realizations from the Gaussian process. Such comparisons enable one to assess objectively whether a trend seen in a residual plot reflects model misspecification or natural variation. The proposed techniques are particularly useful in checking the functional form of a covariate and the link function. Illustrations with several medical studies are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ANTICHAINS FOR THE AUTOMATA-BASED APPROACH TO MODEL-CHECKING
    Doyen, Laurent
    Raskin, Jean-Francois
    LOGICAL METHODS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2009, 5 (01)
  • [22] Underapproximation for model-checking based on random cryptographic constructions
    Matsliah, Arie
    Strichman, Ofer
    COMPUTER AIDED VERIFICATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4590 : 339 - +
  • [23] Model-checking process equivalences
    Lange, Martin
    Lozes, Etienne
    Guzman, Manuel Vargas
    THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2014, 560 : 326 - 347
  • [24] Model-Checking Iterated Games
    Huang, Chung-Hao
    Schewe, Sven
    Wang, Farn
    TOOLS AND ALGORITHMS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS, TACAS 2013, 2013, 7795 : 154 - 168
  • [25] Model-checking for adventure videogames
    Moreno-Ger, Pablo
    Fuentes-Fernandez, Ruben
    Sierra-Rodriguez, Jose-Luis
    Fernandez-Manjon, Baltasar
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 51 (03) : 564 - 580
  • [26] Symmetry reductions in model-checking
    Sistla, AP
    VERIFICATION, MODEL CHECKING, AND ABSTRACT INTERPRETATION, 2003, 2575 : 25 - 25
  • [27] On model-checking of P systems
    Dang, Z
    Ibarra, OH
    Li, C
    Xie, GY
    UNCONVENTIONAL COMPUTATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3699 : 82 - 93
  • [28] Model-checking iterated games
    Chung-Hao Huang
    Sven Schewe
    Farn Wang
    Acta Informatica, 2017, 54 : 625 - 654
  • [29] Symbolic and Structural Model-Checking
    Thierry-Mieg, Yann
    FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE, 2021, 183 (3-4) : 319 - 342
  • [30] Model-Checking on Ordered Structures
    Eickmeyer, Kord
    van den Heuvel, Jan
    Kawarabayashi, Ken-ichi
    Kreutzer, Stephan
    de Mendez, Patrice Ossona
    Pilipczuk, Michal
    Quiroz, Daniel A.
    Rabinovich, Roman
    Siebertz, Sebastian
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL LOGIC, 2020, 21 (02)