Systemic Immunity Influences Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation

被引:22
|
作者
Souter, Melanie [1 ,2 ]
Eastwood, Hayden [1 ]
Marovic, Paul [1 ,3 ]
Kel, Gordana [1 ]
Wongprasartsuk, Sarin [1 ,3 ]
Ryan, Allen F. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
O'Leary, Stephen John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Otolaryngol, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hosp, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
[2] Christchurch Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Otolaryngol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Neurosci, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[6] San Diego VA Healthcare Syst, San Diego, CA USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Cochlear implant; Hearing loss; Innate immunity; Keyhole limpet hemocyanin; Systemic immune system; ROUND WINDOW DEXAMETHASONE; ELECTRODE INSERTION TRAUMA; RESIDUAL HEARING; IMPEDANCE; SURGERY; MECHANISMS; THERAPY; BRAIN; CELLS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824bac44
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: To determine whether a systemic immune response influences hearing thresholds and tissue response after cochlear implantation of hearing guinea pigs. Methods: Guinea pigs were inoculated with sterile antigen (Keyhole limpet hemocyanin) 3 weeks before cochlear implantation. Pure-tone auditory brainstem response thresholds were performed before implantation and 1 and 4 weeks later. Dexamethasone phosphate 20% was adsorbed onto a hyaluronic acid carboxymethylcellulose sponge and was applied to the round window for 30 minutes before electrode insertion. Normal saline was used for controls. Cochlear histology was performed at 4 weeks after implantation to assess the tissue response to implantation. To control for the effect of keyhole limpet hemocyanin priming, a group of unprimed animals underwent cochlear implantation with a saline-soaked pledget applied to the round window. Results: Keyhole limpet hemocyanin priming had no significant detrimental effect on thresholds without implantation. Thresholds were elevated after implantation across all frequencies tested (2-Y32 kHz) in primed animals but only at higher frequencies (4-32 kHz) in unprimed controls. In primed animals, dexamethasone treatment significantly reduced threshold shifts at 2 and 8 kHz. Keyhole limpet hemocyanin led to the more frequent observation of lymphocytes in the tissue response to the implant. Conclusion: Systemic immune activation at the time of cochlear implantation broadened the range of frequencies experiencing elevated thresholds after implantation. Local dexamethasone provides partial protection against this hearing loss, but the degree and extent of protection are less compared to previous studies with unprimed animals.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does Intraoperative Electrocochleography Improve Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation?
    Kelly, Scott M.
    Kim, Ana H.
    Lalwani, Anil K.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2024, 134 (04): : 1496 - 1497
  • [32] Hearing Preservation With Standard Length Electrodes in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation
    Manjaly, Joseph G.
    Nash, Robert
    Ellis, Wayne
    Britz, Anzel
    Lavy, Jeremy A.
    Shaida, Azhar
    Saeed, Shakeel R.
    Khalil, Sherif S.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2018, 39 (09) : 1109 - 1114
  • [33] The Role of Steroids in the Preservation of Hearing and Vestibular Function in Cochlear Implantation
    de Morais, Catarina Pimentel
    Branco, Pedro
    Pereira, Andre
    Castelhano, Luis
    Donato, Mariana
    Correia, Filipe
    O'Neill, Assuncao
    Santos, Ricardo
    Escada, Pedro
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2024, 134 (08): : 3458 - 3465
  • [34] Evolution of electrode array diameter for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation
    Yann Nguyen
    Mosnier, Isabelle
    Borel, Stephanie
    Ambert-Dahan, Emmanuelle
    Bouccara, Didier
    Bozorg-Grayeli, Alexis
    Ferrary, Evelyne
    Sterkers, Olivier
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2013, 133 (02) : 116 - 122
  • [35] An Evaluation of Preservation of Residual Hearing Using the Suprameatal Approach for Cochlear Implantation: Can This Implantation Technique Be Used for Preservation of Residual Hearing?
    Postelmans, Job T. F.
    van Spronsen, Erik
    Grolman, Wilko
    Stokroos, Robert J.
    Tange, Rinze A.
    Mare, Marcel J.
    Dreschler, Wouter A.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2011, 121 (08): : 1794 - 1799
  • [36] New Frontiers in Cochlear Implantation: Acoustic Plus Electric Hearing, Hearing Preservation, and More
    Mowry, Sarah E.
    Woodson, Erika
    Gantz, Bruce J.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 45 (01) : 187 - +
  • [37] Effects of sustained release dexamethasone hydrogels in hearing preservation cochlear implantation
    Honeder, Clemens
    Zhu, Chengjing
    Schoepper, Hanna
    Gausterer, Julia Clara
    Walter, Manuel
    Landegger, Lukas David
    Saidov, Nodir
    Riss, Dominik
    Plasenzotti, Roberto
    Gabor, Franz
    Arnoldner, Christoph
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2016, 341 : 43 - 49
  • [38] Mechanically evoked tinnitus after cochlear implantation with preservation of residual hearing
    Vankatova, Lenka
    Hsieh, Julien Wen
    Daskalou, Dimitrios
    Senn, Pascal
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 23 (06) : 361 - 365
  • [39] Cochlear implantation with Slim Modiolar Electrode carriers enables hearing preservation
    Sakmen, Kenan Dennis
    Issing, Christian
    Vazzana, Caterina
    Weissgerber, Tobias
    Linke, Albrecht
    Stoever, Timo
    Helbig, Silke
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2025,
  • [40] The influence of insertion depth on the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation
    Neumann, M
    Aschendorff, A
    Schipper, J
    Laszig, R
    Klenzner, T
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2005, 84 (02) : 113 - 116