Systemic Immunity Influences Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation

被引:22
|
作者
Souter, Melanie [1 ,2 ]
Eastwood, Hayden [1 ]
Marovic, Paul [1 ,3 ]
Kel, Gordana [1 ]
Wongprasartsuk, Sarin [1 ,3 ]
Ryan, Allen F. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
O'Leary, Stephen John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Otolaryngol, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hosp, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
[2] Christchurch Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Otolaryngol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Neurosci, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[6] San Diego VA Healthcare Syst, San Diego, CA USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Cochlear implant; Hearing loss; Innate immunity; Keyhole limpet hemocyanin; Systemic immune system; ROUND WINDOW DEXAMETHASONE; ELECTRODE INSERTION TRAUMA; RESIDUAL HEARING; IMPEDANCE; SURGERY; MECHANISMS; THERAPY; BRAIN; CELLS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824bac44
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: To determine whether a systemic immune response influences hearing thresholds and tissue response after cochlear implantation of hearing guinea pigs. Methods: Guinea pigs were inoculated with sterile antigen (Keyhole limpet hemocyanin) 3 weeks before cochlear implantation. Pure-tone auditory brainstem response thresholds were performed before implantation and 1 and 4 weeks later. Dexamethasone phosphate 20% was adsorbed onto a hyaluronic acid carboxymethylcellulose sponge and was applied to the round window for 30 minutes before electrode insertion. Normal saline was used for controls. Cochlear histology was performed at 4 weeks after implantation to assess the tissue response to implantation. To control for the effect of keyhole limpet hemocyanin priming, a group of unprimed animals underwent cochlear implantation with a saline-soaked pledget applied to the round window. Results: Keyhole limpet hemocyanin priming had no significant detrimental effect on thresholds without implantation. Thresholds were elevated after implantation across all frequencies tested (2-Y32 kHz) in primed animals but only at higher frequencies (4-32 kHz) in unprimed controls. In primed animals, dexamethasone treatment significantly reduced threshold shifts at 2 and 8 kHz. Keyhole limpet hemocyanin led to the more frequent observation of lymphocytes in the tissue response to the implant. Conclusion: Systemic immune activation at the time of cochlear implantation broadened the range of frequencies experiencing elevated thresholds after implantation. Local dexamethasone provides partial protection against this hearing loss, but the degree and extent of protection are less compared to previous studies with unprimed animals.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dynamic Postural Stability and Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation
    Buhl, Christof
    Artemiev, Dmitri
    Pfiffner, Flurin
    Swanenburg, Jaap
    Veraguth, Dorothe
    Roosli, Christof
    Huber, Alexander
    Dalbert, Adrian
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2018, 23 (04) : 222 - 228
  • [22] Glucocorticoid for Hearing Preservation After Cochlear Implantation: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Animal Studies
    Shaul, Chanan
    Venkatagiri, Padmavathi K.
    Lo, Jonathon
    Eastwood, Hayden T.
    Bester, Christofer W.
    Briggs, Robert J. S.
    O'Leary, Stephen J.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2019, 40 (09) : 1178 - 1185
  • [23] Functional Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: The Miami Cocktail Effect
    Angeli, Simon Ignacio
    Brown, C. Scott
    Holcomb, Meredith A.
    Velandia, Sandra L.
    Eshraghi, Adrien A.
    Chiossone-Kerdel, Juan Armando
    Hoffer, Michael E.
    Sanchez, Chrisanda
    Telischi, Fred F.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2024, 45 (04) : 376 - 385
  • [24] The role of extended preoperative steroids in hearing preservation cochlear implantation
    Kuthubutheen, Jafri
    Coates, Harvey
    Rowsell, Corwyn
    Nedzelski, Julian
    Chen, Joseph M.
    Lin, Vincent
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2015, 327 : 257 - 264
  • [25] Electrode selection for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: A review of the evidence
    Brant Jason A.
    Ruckenstein Michael J.
    世界耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志英文版, 2016, (03) : 157 - 160
  • [26] Hearing Preservation Surgery for Cochlear Implantation: A Meta-analysis
    Maria, Peter Luke Santa
    Gluth, Michael Brian
    Yuan, Yongqing
    Atlas, Marcus David
    Blevins, Nikolas H.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (10) : E256 - E269
  • [27] The Impact of Electrode Array Length on Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation
    Suhling, Marie-Charlot
    Majdani, Omid
    Salcher, Rolf
    Leifholz, Melanie
    Buechner, Andreas
    Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke
    Lenarz, Thomas
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2016, 37 (08) : 1006 - 1015
  • [28] Residual hearing preservation using the suprameatal approach for cochlear implantation
    Arnoldner, Christoph
    Gstoettner, Wolfgang
    Riss, Dominik
    Wagenblast, Jens
    Honeder, Clemens
    Blineder, Michaela
    Hamzavi, Jafar-Sasan
    Jappel, Alexandra
    Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2011, 123 (19-20) : 599 - 602
  • [29] 805 Eluting Electrodes for Hearing Preservation - the Future of Cochlear Implantation?
    Nikookam, Y.
    Radotra, A.
    Metcalfe, C.
    Muzaffar, J.
    Monksfield, P.
    Bance, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (SUPPL 2)
  • [30] Electrode selection for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: A review of the evidence
    Brant Jason A
    Ruckenstein Michael J
    世界耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志(英文), 2016, 2 (03)